Foramen Ovale, Patent, Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
cryptogenic stroke, percutaneous closure of PFO, follow-up exams
Brief summary
Following a cryptogenic stroke, many patients are nowadays treated with the percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), assuming that the aetiology of the stroke is secondary to a paradoxical embolism. After the PFO closure procedure a dual antiplatelet regimen is often prescribed for 3-6 months and several cardiologic and neurologic follow-up exams are scheduled in the first 12 months of follow-up. Usually a transthoracic +/- transoesophageal echocardiography (TTE +/- TEE) are performed at 6 months, however this kind of control is not systematically performed. In order to improve the clinical outcomes in this young patients' population, the investigators prospectively perform a complete cardiologic and neurologic follow-up program to all patients undergoing a successful percutaneous closure of a PFO. The aim of these controls is to confirm the good position of the PFO-device, to confirm the absence of any residual right to left shunt or any significant atrial arrhythmias Furthermore this prospective follow-up will analyze the possible mechanisms leading to a cerebral stroke recurrence (e.g. size of the PFO, presence of an atrial septal aneurysm, presence of a residual shunt, size of the utilized closure device, ....).
Detailed description
At follow-up the following exams will be performed: * at hospital discharge: chest X-ray +/- TTE + 7-days event loop record (ELR) * at 6 months: clinical cardiologic and neurologic examination + TTE + TEE + 7-days ELR + trans-cranial doppler (TCD) with micro bubbles detection. * at 1 year: clinical cardiologic and neurologic examination + TTE +/- TEE + 7-days ELR + trans-cranial doppler (TCD) with micro bubbles detection +/- cerebral MRI
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 18 years old patients * signed informed consent * all consecutive patients undergoing a successful percutaneous closure of a PFO secondary to a cryptogenic stroke
Exclusion criteria
* all patients with an alternative aetiology of the initial stroke * all patients in whom the percutaneous closure of the PFO is contraindicated * all patients with a known allergy to aspirin and or clopidogrel
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| residual shunt at 6-12 months follow-up | 6-12 months | incidence and clinical relevance of right to left residual shunts at 6-12 months after the successful closure of the PFO |
| stroke recurrence | 6-12 months | incidence and clinical predictors of stroke recurrence at 6-12 months |
| possible other aetiologies of the initial cryptogenic stroke | 6-12 months | during the 12 months follow-up all other possible aetiologies explaining the initial cryptogenic stroke will be taken into consideration |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 6 months dual antiplatelet regimen safety and efficacy | 6 months | confirm the safety and efficacy of the adopted 6 months dual antiplatelet regimen |
Countries
Switzerland