Skip to content

Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT) Versus Bulking Agent for the Treatment of Post Vulvectomy Urinary Incontinence

A Comparison Between Tension-free Vaginal Tape and Bulking Agent for the Treatment of Post-vulvectomy Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01148290
Enrollment
40
Registered
2010-06-22
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2013-04-30
Last updated
2013-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Keywords

bulking agent, emivulvectomy, radical vulvectomy, TVT, urinary incontinence, vulvar cancer

Brief summary

The surgical treatment of vulvar cancer is characterized by a radical approach as standard, often associated to an important rate of functional complications. This surgery often includes the partial excision of urethra, resulting in a reduction of urethral closure pressure. The radiotherapy-induced fibrosis in addiction leads to a reduction of urethral mobility. As consequence women treated for vulvar cancer may develop urinary incontinence. The incidence of this complication has been differently reported, but seems to reach the 100%. Poor data are available regarding the treatment of post vulvectomy urinary incontinence and no clear indication may be given at regards. Based on these considerations the aim of this trial will be to compare tension free vaginal tape and bulking agent injection in women with urinary stress incontinence developed after radical surgery for vulvar cancer.

Detailed description

Women with urinary stress incontinence developed after radical vulvectomy will be enrolled and randomized in two groups (arm 1 and arm 2). Patients of group 1 will be treated with the tension free vaginal tape, whereas in patients of arm 2 will be used the bulking agent injection. All eligible patients will undergo baseline assessment consisting of anthropometric, clinical, and urodynamic evaluations. During the study, the surgical outcomes, the clinical subjective and objective efficacy data, and the adverse experiences will be evaluated in each patient. Data will be analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle and a P value of 0.05 or less will be considered significant.

Interventions

Small incision sites in the vagina and suprapubically. Bilateral retropubic insertion of the sling by means of needles

PROCEDUREBulking agent injection

Three Periurethral injections of Bulkamid ® (Ethicon,Somerville, NJ, USA)

Sponsors

University Magna Graecia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stress urinary incontinence by self report, examination and test * History of radical vulvectomy

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic disease and/or drugs known to affect bladder function * Current chemotherapy or radiation therapy * Detrusor instability

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cure rate12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Intra-operative complication rate1 day
Postoperative complication rate12 months
Quality of life12 months
Second surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI)12 months
Satisfaction12 months
Recurrence rate12 months

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026