Skip to content

Effect of Different Interventions on Glycemic Control and β-cell Function in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Comparison of Exenatide, Insulin or Pioglitazone on Glycaemic Control and β-cell Function in Drug-naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Multicentre Randomized Parallel-group Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01147627
Enrollment
416
Registered
2010-06-22
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2013-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Newly Diagnosed

Keywords

diabetes mellitus, type 2, newly diagnosed, exenatide, premixed insulin analog, thiazolidinedione, β-cell function, glycemic control

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate and evaluate the effects of different interventions (1. exenatide, 2. insulin, 3. thiazolidinedione) on glycemic control and β-cell function in newly diagnosed drug-naïve type 2 diabetic patients.

Detailed description

One of the fundamental defects in type 2 diabetes mellitus is declining β-cell function. Exenatide targets multiple metabolic disturbances in type 2 diabetes and exerts direct effects on β-cell, which indicates that it may not only contribute to the glucose control but also delay disease progression. There are trials demonstrated efficacy, safety and tolerability of exenatide. However, no study has compared the effects of exenatide with other hypoglycemic therapies with β cell protective function in newly diagnosed and drug-naïve type 2 diabetic patients. This current study is thus designed to evaluate the effects of exenatide, insulin and pioglitazone on glycemic control and β-cell function in newly diagnosed drug-naïve type 2 diabetic patients.

Interventions

Patients in exenatide group will be treated with exenatide (Byetta®, Eli Lilly and Company) 5 µg BID for the first 4 weeks and then 10 µg BID thereafter.

DRUGMixed Protamine Zinc Recombinant Human Insulin Lispro 25R

Patients in insulin group will be treated with premixed insulin analog (Humalog Mix 25, Eli Lilly and Company). The initial insulin doses are 0.4 IU/kg per day(50% before breakfast and 50% before dinner). Insulin doses are titrated following a forced schedule according to blood glucose before breakfast and dinner.

DRUGPioglitazone

Patients in thiazolidinedione group will be treated with Pioglitazone 30mg daily as single dose. The dose will be increased to 45mg daily after 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ministry of Health, China
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients, drug naïve * age 30\ 70 years * HbA1c 7.0\ 10.0% * BMI 20\ 35 kg/m2, stable body weight (≤10% variation) for at least 3 months prior to screening * female patients of reproductive age should practice a reliable method of birth control throughout the study

Exclusion criteria

* acute or severe chronic diabetic complications * congestive heart failure (NYHA grade Ⅲ\ Ⅳ) * severe gastrointestinal disease * severe osteoporosis or history of pathological fracture,or use of bisphosphonates preparation * other severe intercurrent illness * serum aminotransferase (ALT and AST) level higher than 2 times of the upper normal limits and/or serum creatinie≥133µmol/L (1.5mg/dL) * tested positive for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody * use of weight loss drugs, corticosteroids, drugs known to affect gastrointestinal motility, transplantation medications, or any investigational drug * history of pancreatitis * serum triglyceride ≥ 5.0 mmol/L * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the Comparison Between Treatment Groups of the Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Weeks48 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <7% and ≤ 6.5% and Effect of Different Interventions on Fasting and Postprandial Plasma Glucose Concentration, Blood Pressure, Lipid Profiles48 weeks
β-cell Function (Acute Insulin Response During IVGTT; HOMA-B, Disposition Index and Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio)48 weeks
Safety and Tolerability in Different Groups48 weeks

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Exenatide142
Premixed Insulin Analog138
Thiazolidinedione136
Total416

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPremixed Insulin AnalogThiazolidinedioneTotalExenatide
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants7 Participants27 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
128 Participants129 Participants389 Participants132 Participants
Age Continuous51.39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.65
49.66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.86
50.31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
49.89 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.64
Region of Enrollment
China
138 participants136 participants416 participants142 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants53 Participants150 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
85 Participants83 Participants266 Participants98 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
69 / 14242 / 13843 / 136
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 1421 / 1387 / 136

Outcome results

Primary

the Comparison Between Treatment Groups of the Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Weeks

Time frame: 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Exenatidethe Comparison Between Treatment Groups of the Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Weeks-1.8 percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.29
Premixed Insulin Analogthe Comparison Between Treatment Groups of the Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Weeks-1.74 percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.16
Thiazolidinedionethe Comparison Between Treatment Groups of the Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Weeks-1.47 percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 1.3
p-value: <0.05ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <7% and ≤ 6.5% and Effect of Different Interventions on Fasting and Postprandial Plasma Glucose Concentration, Blood Pressure, Lipid Profiles

Time frame: 48 weeks

Secondary

Safety and Tolerability in Different Groups

Time frame: 48 weeks

Secondary

β-cell Function (Acute Insulin Response During IVGTT; HOMA-B, Disposition Index and Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio)

Time frame: 48 weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026