Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of a Herbal Medicinal Product (Dry Extract BNO 1016) in Patients With Acute Rhinosinusitis

A Multi-centre, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomised, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a Herbal Medicinal Product (Dry Extract BNO 1016) in Patients With Acute Rhinosinusitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01146860
Enrollment
386
Registered
2010-06-22
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2013-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Rhinosinusitis

Keywords

BNO 1016, acute rhinosinusitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the dry extract BNO 1016 is effective and safe in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis in adults.

Detailed description

The aim of this clinical study is to investigate the efficacy of a 15-days treatment with the herbal medicinal product BNO 1016 for therapy of acute rhinosinusitis in adult patients. Due to the considerable morbidity and the diminished quality of life experienced by people afflicted with acute rhinosinusitis an important aim of the treatment is to reduce the severity of rhinosinusitis symptoms and the duration of the disease. By grading the severity of the disease on the basis of the 5 main rhinosinusitis symptoms the investigator will assess the efficacy of the treatment.

Interventions

sugar coated tablets with dry extract (80 mg) of 5 herbal drugs; dosage: 480 mg per day (2 tablets t.i.d.) duration: 15 days

DRUGPlacebo

sugar coated tablets with identical appearance to active treatment; frequency: 2 tablets t.i.d. duration 15 days

Sponsors

Bionorica SE
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis * characterized by a major symptom score (MSS) ≥ 8 and ≤ 12 points (minimum 0, maximum 15 points) * individual score for facial pain/pressure ≥ 1 (mild) and ≤ 2 (moderate) * confirmed by ultrasonography of paranasal sinuses * with presence of symptoms ≤ 3 days prior to inclusion

Exclusion criteria

* Chronic rhinosinusitis * Polyposis nasi * Anatomical deviations of the nasal septum that significantly impair nasal and paranasal ventilation/airflow * Acute symptoms of a known allergic rhinitis * Patients with asthma who have a history of exacerbations within 30 days prior to study inclusion * Signs or symptoms of fulminant bacterial sinusitis * Odontogenic sinusitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Symptom Score (MSS) Assessed by the Investigator14 daysMSS: sum of the 5 main rhinosinusitis symptoms which are: rhinorrhea (anterior discharge), postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, facial pain/pressure. Each symptom is individually evaluated using the following 4-point rating scale (scoring system): 0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Thus the MSS ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 15 score points.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SNOT 20 Symptom Scores14 daysSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT 20): 20 item questionnaire to assess the symptoms and emotional and social consequences of rhinosinusitis. The symptoms are assessed by the patient using a 6-point rating scale: 0 = not present / no problem, 1 = very mild problem, 2 = mild or slight problem, 3 = moderate problem, 4 = severe problem, 5 = problem as bad as it can be. range: 0 to 100
Major Symptom Score Assessed by the Patient14 daysMSS: sum of the 5 main rhinosinusitis symptoms which are: rhinorrhea (anterior discharge), postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, facial pain/pressure. Each symptom is individually evaluated using the following 4-point rating scale (scoring system): 0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Thus the MSS ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 15 score points.
Percentage of Patients Classified as Responders by the Investigator on a 4-point Rating Scale14 daysGeneral assessment of efficacy using a 4-point rating scale (symptoms healed, improved, unchanged, deteriorated). Patients whose symptoms are improved or healed will be classified as responders to treatment. Patients whose symptoms are unchanged or deteriorated as classified as non-responders.
Ultrasonography of Paranasal Sinuses14 daysPercentage of patients with signs of acute rhinosinusitis in ultrasonography of paranasal sinuses will be evaluated. Ultrasonography scans will be visually evaluated by the investigator for signs of rhinosinusitis.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

January 2010 to April 2010 37 centres (16 ENT and 21 specialists in internal medicine and general practitioners

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BNO 1016
sugar coated tablets
194
Placebo
sugar coated tablets
192
Total386

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboBNO 1016Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants20 Participants30 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
182 Participants174 Participants356 Participants
Age Continuous40.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
40.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
Region of Enrollment
Germany
192 participants194 participants386 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
122 Participants127 Participants249 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
70 Participants67 Participants137 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 19427 / 191
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1940 / 191

Outcome results

Primary

Major Symptom Score (MSS) Assessed by the Investigator

MSS: sum of the 5 main rhinosinusitis symptoms which are: rhinorrhea (anterior discharge), postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, facial pain/pressure. Each symptom is individually evaluated using the following 4-point rating scale (scoring system): 0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Thus the MSS ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 15 score points.

Time frame: 14 days

Population: FAS: randomised patients with at least one documented application of the drug and post-baseline efficacy data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BNO 1016Major Symptom Score (MSS) Assessed by the Investigator2.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Assessed by the Investigator3.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Secondary

Major Symptom Score Assessed by the Patient

MSS: sum of the 5 main rhinosinusitis symptoms which are: rhinorrhea (anterior discharge), postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, facial pain/pressure. Each symptom is individually evaluated using the following 4-point rating scale (scoring system): 0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Thus the MSS ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 15 score points.

Time frame: 14 days

Population: FAS: randomised patients with at least one documented application of the drug and post-baseline efficacy data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BNO 1016Major Symptom Score Assessed by the Patient2.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
PlaceboMajor Symptom Score Assessed by the Patient3.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Classified as Responders by the Investigator on a 4-point Rating Scale

General assessment of efficacy using a 4-point rating scale (symptoms healed, improved, unchanged, deteriorated). Patients whose symptoms are improved or healed will be classified as responders to treatment. Patients whose symptoms are unchanged or deteriorated as classified as non-responders.

Time frame: 14 days

Population: FAS: randomised patients with at least one documented application of the drug and post-baseline efficacy data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BNO 1016Percentage of Patients Classified as Responders by the Investigator on a 4-point Rating Scale94.2 percentage of patients
PlaceboPercentage of Patients Classified as Responders by the Investigator on a 4-point Rating Scale87.4 percentage of patients
Secondary

SNOT 20 Symptom Scores

Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT 20): 20 item questionnaire to assess the symptoms and emotional and social consequences of rhinosinusitis. The symptoms are assessed by the patient using a 6-point rating scale: 0 = not present / no problem, 1 = very mild problem, 2 = mild or slight problem, 3 = moderate problem, 4 = severe problem, 5 = problem as bad as it can be. range: 0 to 100

Time frame: 14 days

Population: FAS: randomised patients with at least one documented application of the drug and post-baseline efficacy data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BNO 1016SNOT 20 Symptom Scores11.02 units on a scale (range: 0 - 100)Standard Deviation 12.72
PlaceboSNOT 20 Symptom Scores15.76 units on a scale (range: 0 - 100)Standard Deviation 16.26
Secondary

Ultrasonography of Paranasal Sinuses

Percentage of patients with signs of acute rhinosinusitis in ultrasonography of paranasal sinuses will be evaluated. Ultrasonography scans will be visually evaluated by the investigator for signs of rhinosinusitis.

Time frame: 14 days

Population: FAS: randomised patients with at least one documented application of the drug and post-baseline efficacy data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BNO 1016Ultrasonography of Paranasal Sinuses26.8 percentage of patients
PlaceboUltrasonography of Paranasal Sinuses38.4 percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026