Skip to content

Prospective Trial for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis in High Risk Patients

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided and Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis in High Risk Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01146743
Enrollment
59
Registered
2010-06-22
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2011-03-31
Last updated
2011-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholecystitis

Keywords

EUS-guided transmural cholecystostomy

Brief summary

The investigators would like to conduct a prospective, randomized non-inferiority study to compare clinical outcome between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) in high risk acute cholecystitis patients.

Detailed description

The primary outcome is to compare clinical resolution rate of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis patients with high risk. The secondary outcome is to compare complications, conversion rate to open cholecystectomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Interventions

EUS-guided gallbladder drainage was performed with a linear-array echoendoscope. The initial puncture was performed at the antrum of the stomach or bulb of the duodenum and was chosen to access the gallbladder body or neck and avoid visible vessels. After removal of the needle, a 6F or 7F bougie were inserted and then removed to dilate the tract. Afterward, nasobiliary drainage tube or stent was placed.

PROCEDUREpercutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage

Under ultrasound guidance, needle punctured to gallbladder via percutaneous transhepatic route.

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* high risk for general anesthesia and emergency operation (American Society of Anesthesiologists, ASA grade III or IV)

Exclusion criteria

* Age below 18 years * Pregnancy * When the risks of endoscopy to patient are judged to outweigh the most favorable benefits of the procedure. * Unstable or unwilling to comply with follow-up * When a perforated viscus is known or suspected * Simultaneously participating in another investigational drug or device study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical response rateWithin 72 hours from procedureDefinition of clinical response rate within 72 hours from procedure was improvement of local signs and systemic signs of inflammation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complication rateComplications during the procedure or within 1 weeksComplication was defined as any procedure-related complications during the procedure or within 1 week, including bile leakage, pneumoperitoneum, bleeding, and etc.
Conversion rateDuring laparoscopic cholectstectomyConversion was defined as conversion to open cholecystectomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026