Skip to content

Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Measure Effect of Glycemic Index

The Effect of Glycemic Index on Post-prandial Glycemia (Breakfast vs. Lunch) in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Quantification With Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01145547
Enrollment
7
Registered
2010-06-16
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2015-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

glycemic index, Diabetes Mellitus, continuous glucose monitoring

Brief summary

Background: Post-prandial hyperglycemia is common in people with type 1 diabetes. Objective: The aim was to determine the impact of low vs high glycemic index (GI) on post-prandial glycemia for breakfast vs lunch and to quantify these effects with continuous glucose monitoring. Design: Seven adult subjects with type 1 diabetes participated in two experiments, each consisting of two meals each. In one experiment, both meals had a low GI; in the other, high GI. Meals were given 195 minutes apart and were matched for carbohydrate, protein, and fat content. Each subject received his usual pre-prandial insulin dosage, followed by a continuous subcutaneous basal insulin infusion for the remainder of the experiment. Arterialized venous glucose was analyzed every 15 minutes and sensor glucose was recorded every 5 minutes.

Detailed description

A total of 14 diet studies (each with two meals) were completed in three men and four women. All subjects completed two diet studies in which two meals were served 195 minutes apart. On one study day, two high GI (\> 75) meals were given, and on the other study day, two low GI (\< 30) meals were given. The low GI and high GI meals were matched for amount of carbohydrates, protein, and fat based on a weight-maintaining diet for each subject. The order of the study treatment (high or low GI) was randomized. Subjects were not informed as the GI of any meal.

Interventions

DEVICEDexcom Seven® Plus Continuous Glucose Monitoring sensor

A Dexcom Seven® Plus Continuous Glucose Monitoring sensor was inserted subcutaneously into each subject.

Sponsors

Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Legacy Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus * patients on insulin pump therapy

Exclusion criteria

Any patient who was * pregnancy * cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, kidney, or liver disease * uncontrolled chronic medical conditions * oral or parenteral corticosteroid use * immunosuppressant use * visual or physical impairments that impede the use of a continuous glucose monitoring device * insulin or glucagon allergy * hypoglycemia unawareness * requirement of greater than 200 units of insulin per day * gastroparesis * any prior gastric surgery * an allergy to any food items served.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Area Under the Curve for Rise in Breakfast Post-prandial.Mean area under the curve was calculated at 0, 15min, 30 min, 45 min, 60min, 75 min, 90 min, 105 min, 120min, 135min, 150min, 165min and 180 min after breakfastArterialized blood glucose was monitored at 15 minute intervals and sensed glucose was recorded at five minute intervals. Mean area under the curve was calculated over the 3 hour period after breakfast for both the high and low glycemic breakfast meals.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Seven subjects with Type 1 diabetes mellitus on subcutaneous insulin pump therapy were recruited from clinics in Portland, Oregon, USA.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Seven adult subjects with type 1 diabetes participated in two experiments, each consisting of two meals each. In one experiment, both meals had a low Glycemic Index and in one experiment, both meals had a high Glycemic Index. Dexcom Seven® Plus Continuous Glucose Monitoring sensor: A Dexcom Seven® Plus Continuous Glucose Monitoring sensor was inserted subcutaneously into each subject.
7
Total7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants
Age, Continuous45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Area Under the Curve for Rise in Breakfast Post-prandial.

Arterialized blood glucose was monitored at 15 minute intervals and sensed glucose was recorded at five minute intervals. Mean area under the curve was calculated over the 3 hour period after breakfast for both the high and low glycemic breakfast meals.

Time frame: Mean area under the curve was calculated at 0, 15min, 30 min, 45 min, 60min, 75 min, 90 min, 105 min, 120min, 135min, 150min, 165min and 180 min after breakfast

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low Glycemic Index Effect on Post-prandial PeakMean Area Under the Curve for Rise in Breakfast Post-prandial.61 min x (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 135
High Glycemic Index Effect on Post-prandial PeakMean Area Under the Curve for Rise in Breakfast Post-prandial.583 min x (mmol/l)Standard Deviation 113

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026