Skip to content

Enbrel-Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) Use Results Survey [All-Case Surveillance]

Enbrel-JIA Use Results Survey [All-Case Surveillance]

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01145352
Acronym
Enbrel-JIA
Enrollment
113
Registered
2010-06-16
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2014-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Keywords

Enbrel-JIA

Brief summary

This surveillance is conducted to survey the followings under the post marketed drug utilization on the patients who are administrated ENBREL as a treatment for active polyarticular JIA. 1. Primary Occurrence status of Adverse Events; incidence of all adverse events, serious adverse events 2. Secondary Factors affecting safety and to confirm the efficacy such as DAS28.

Detailed description

All patients who administrated ENBREL for active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis during registered period (2.5 year).

Interventions

All patients who administrated ENBREL for active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (restricted to the case of lack of effect by other treatment) during registered period (2.5 year).

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients in active polyarticular JIA (restricted to the case of lack of effect by other treatment) during enrollment period (2.5years). * Patients receiving Enbrel for JIA as diagnosed by a qualified physician. * Age 5 - 16 years

Exclusion criteria

* Patients not administered ENBREL

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Etanercept24 weeksAdverse events are all unfavorable events, including clinically problematic abnormal changes in laboratory test values, which develop in participants after the administration of Etanercept, irrespective of causal relationship to Etanercept. The causal relationship between an adverse event and Etanercept was evaluated by the sponsor.
Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Etanercept24 weeksSerious treatment-related adverse events are defined as any events that lead to death, life-thretening, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, a permanent or remarkable disorder/dysfunction, congenital anormaly/congenital deficiency, or other medically significant events or disorder.
Number of Unlisted Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Etanercept24 weeksAdverse events are all unfavorable events, including clinically problematic abnormal changes in laboratory test values, which develop in participants after the administration of Etanercept, irrespective of causal relationship to Etanercept. The causal relationship between an adverse event and Etanercept was evaluated by the sponsor. Unlisted treatment-related adverse events were confirmed with listed adverse drug reactions specified in Japanese package insert.
Percentage of Good Responders and Moderate Responders Among Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS2824 weeksThe Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count based (DAS28-based) EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 =\< 3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \>3.2 or change from baseline \>0.6 to =\<1.2 with DAS28 =\<5.1; non-responders: change from baseline =\< 0.6 or change from baseline \>0.6 and =\<1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement On Physician's Assessment.24 weeksPercentage of participants in whom the efficacy of etanercept was assessed as either markedly effective or effective.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)
Participants with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who received 10 mg or 25 mg lyophilized etanercept (genetical recombination) for subcutaneous injection.
102
Total102

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyFound to have been registered twice6
Overall StudySyringe formulation was used1
Overall StudyTreated before marketing approval4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtanercept (Genetical Recombination)
Age, Customized
>= 10 to < 15 years
37 participants
Age, Customized
>= 15 to < 20 years
30 participants
Age, Customized
>= 20 to < 30 years
10 participants
Age, Customized
>=30 years
0 participants
Age, Customized
>= 5 to < 10 years
24 participants
Age, Customized
<5 years
1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
78 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 102
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 102

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Etanercept

Serious treatment-related adverse events are defined as any events that lead to death, life-thretening, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, a permanent or remarkable disorder/dysfunction, congenital anormaly/congenital deficiency, or other medically significant events or disorder.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The safety analysis population consisted of the participants who received 10 mg or 25 mg lyophilized etanercept (genetical recombination) for subcutaneous injection indicated for polyarticular JIA after the marketing authorization had been granted.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Etanercept1 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Etanercept

Adverse events are all unfavorable events, including clinically problematic abnormal changes in laboratory test values, which develop in participants after the administration of Etanercept, irrespective of causal relationship to Etanercept. The causal relationship between an adverse event and Etanercept was evaluated by the sponsor.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The safety analysis population consisted of the participants who received 10 mg or 25 mg lyophilized etanercept (genetical recombination) for subcutaneous injection indicated for polyarticular JIA after the marketing authorization had been granted.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Etanercept22 participants
Primary

Number of Unlisted Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Etanercept

Adverse events are all unfavorable events, including clinically problematic abnormal changes in laboratory test values, which develop in participants after the administration of Etanercept, irrespective of causal relationship to Etanercept. The causal relationship between an adverse event and Etanercept was evaluated by the sponsor. Unlisted treatment-related adverse events were confirmed with listed adverse drug reactions specified in Japanese package insert.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The safety analysis population consisted of the participants who received 10 mg or 25 mg lyophilized etanercept (genetical recombination) for subcutaneous injection indicated for polyarticular JIA after the marketing authorization had been granted.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Number of Unlisted Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Etanercept3 events
Primary

Percentage of Good Responders and Moderate Responders Among Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28

The Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count based (DAS28-based) EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 =\< 3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \>3.2 or change from baseline \>0.6 to =\<1.2 with DAS28 =\<5.1; non-responders: change from baseline =\< 0.6 or change from baseline \>0.6 and =\<1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The efficacy analysis population consisted of the participants in whom DAS28 (4/ESR) was calculated (N = number of participants evaluated). The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Good Responders and Moderate Responders Among Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28At 16 weeks (N = 32)75.00 Percentage of participants
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Good Responders and Moderate Responders Among Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28At 20 weeks (N = 34)73.53 Percentage of participants
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Good Responders and Moderate Responders Among Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28At 24 weeks (N = 46)63.04 Percentage of participants
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Good Responders and Moderate Responders Among Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28At 4 weeks (N = 25)72.00 Percentage of participants
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Good Responders and Moderate Responders Among Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28At 8 weeks (N = 30)73.33 Percentage of participants
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Good Responders and Moderate Responders Among Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28At 12 weeks (N = 31)70.97 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement On Physician's Assessment.

Percentage of participants in whom the efficacy of etanercept was assessed as either markedly effective or effective.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The efficacy analysis population consisted of the participants in whom DAS28 (4/ESR) was calculated (N = number of participants evaluated). The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement On Physician's Assessment.At 4 weeks (N = 51)94.12 percent
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement On Physician's Assessment.At 8 weeks (N = 63)93.65 percent
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement On Physician's Assessment.At 12 weeks (N = 64)93.75 percent
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement On Physician's Assessment.At 16 weeks (N = 65)93.85 percent
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement On Physician's Assessment.At 20 weeks (N = 67)91.04 percent
Etanercept (Genetical Recombination)Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement On Physician's Assessment.At 24 weeks (N = 83)95.18 percent

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026