Skip to content

New Ways to Help Patients Improve Their Diabetes Control

Examining Ways to Increase Patient Understanding of Diabetes Control and Disease Severity Through Reinterpretation of Hemoglobin A1C Values With the Goal of Improved Diabetes Control

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01143870
Enrollment
177
Registered
2010-06-14
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2018-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

The percent of glycosylated hemoglobin, also known as a hemoglobin A1C value, is the standard way that clinicians assess a patient's diabetes control. Numerous studies have shown that maintaining a hemoglobin A1C value less than 7% is associated with lower rates of diabetes-related complications. Clinicians use this value to determine whether a patient with diabetes requires changes in their disease management. The main problem with this practice is that many patients do not understand what this number means. The goal of this project is to examine ways to make feedback about glycemic control easier for patients to understand. The hope is that improved patient understanding will result in an improvement in diabetic control and thus a reduction in disease-associated complications. Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes and a hemoglobin A1C value greater than 8% within the preceding three months will be eligible for the study. Pregnant women will be excluded. Given the nature of the intervention we will also exclude patients with cognitive deficits. In this study, patients will be randomized to three groups. The first group with be told their HgbA1C value only, the second group will be told a letter grade interpretation of that value, and the third group will be shown a face. The face emotions will range from happy to sad reflecting the level of control. The main outcome will be trend in hemoglobin A1C values over time. Secondary outcomes will include patient understanding of disease state and the number of hemoglobin A1C values checked following the intervention.

Interventions

OTHERDiabetes Report Card

Enrolled participants will receive an individualized diabetes report card which depicts their current level of diabetes control in one of three ways--hemoglobin A1C, face, or letter grade.

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1\. Patients over the age of 18 with diabetes mellitus listed as a problem list or in their past medical history on their electronic medical record who have a hemoglobin A1C value greater than 8% within three months of study enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant patients 2. Illiterate patients 3. Patients with known cognitive deficits affecting ability to participate in study 4. Any current participants in another active research study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Percent of Glycosylated Hemoglobin 6 Months Following Enrollment6 months from enrollment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Patient Understanding of Disease State2 weeks on averageChange in patient understanding of disease state as assessed by questionnaire administered pre- and post-intervention.
The Number of Hemoglobin A1C Values Checked During 6 Month Study Period6 months
Change in Hemoglobin A1C Over 12 Months From Enrollment12 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Received information on diabetes control using the standard hemoglobin A1c value
58
Letter Grades
Received information on diabetes control translated into a letter grade, ranging from A-F
58
Faces
Received information on diabetes control translated into a emoticon, ranging from smiling to crying
61
Total177

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlLetter GradesFacesTotal
Age, Continuous56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
56.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
48 Participants50 Participants48 Participants146 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants6 Participants9 Participants23 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants45 Participants44 Participants130 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants13 Participants17 Participants47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 580 / 580 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 580 / 580 / 61

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Percent of Glycosylated Hemoglobin 6 Months Following Enrollment

Time frame: 6 months from enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlChange in Percent of Glycosylated Hemoglobin 6 Months Following Enrollment-0.74 Percent of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Error 0.37
Letter GradesChange in Percent of Glycosylated Hemoglobin 6 Months Following Enrollment-0.55 Percent of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Error 0.3
FacesChange in Percent of Glycosylated Hemoglobin 6 Months Following Enrollment-0.89 Percent of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Error 0.3
Secondary

Change in Hemoglobin A1C Over 12 Months From Enrollment

Time frame: 12 months

Secondary

Change in Patient Understanding of Disease State

Change in patient understanding of disease state as assessed by questionnaire administered pre- and post-intervention.

Time frame: 2 weeks on average

Secondary

The Number of Hemoglobin A1C Values Checked During 6 Month Study Period

Time frame: 6 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026