Skip to content

Enzymatic Versus (vs) Autolytic Debridement of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Comparison of SANTYL vs. Hydrogel in Debridement of Inflamed Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01143727
Enrollment
20
Registered
2010-06-14
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2013-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Brief summary

This study compares two standard methods for cleaning the surface of wounds on the feet of patients with diabetes mellitus. The question being asked is whether inflammation of the wound affects the ability of one or both of the methods to work.

Interventions

DRUGSantyl

Apply one 24-hr period sufficient to cover the wound.

DRUGTegaderm Hydrogel

Apply once 24-hr period sufficient to cover the wound.

Sponsors

Healthpoint
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The informed consent document must be read, signed, and dated by the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative before conducting any study procedures or exams. In addition, the informed consent document must be signed and dated by the individual who consents the subject before conducting the screening visit. A photocopy of the signed informed consent document must be provided to the subject, and the original signed document placed in the subject's chart. * Of either sex, aged 18 years or older. * A diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus, Type I or II, requiring medication to control blood glucose levels. * A qualifying ulcer, defined as follows: * Ulcer grade 1 or 2 on the Wagner Classification Scale (refer to Section 9.4.1) * Infection / inflammation grade 1 or 2 for wound bed inflammation (refer to Section 9.4.2) * Has not been treated or has not responded to treatment during the past 30 days * Has an apparent area ≥ 3.0 cm² * Requires debridement of the wound bed * Is sufficiently moist to allow collection of wound fluid using a filter paper disc * Adequate arterial blood flow evidenced by ankle brachial index (ABI) of ≥ 0.7 and ≤ 1.1; if the ABI is greater than 1.1, then toe pressure of \>50 mmHg. * Subject must be willing to use the Darco shoe off-loading device and insole, or a comparable device, as indicated. * Subject able to follow instructions, particularly regarding the application of test articles and dressings at home. Able to apply the test articles, or has a caregiver available to apply the test articles according to the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications or known hypersensitivity to the test articles or their components. * Cellulitis extending \>2 cm around the target ulcer, lymphangitic streaking, spread beneath the superficial fascia, deep-tissue abscess, gangrene, or infection of muscle, tendon, joint or bone. * Target ulcer tunneling per probing and visual assessment. * Use of systemic antibiotics or any drug listed in Section 9.1.6 of this protocol within 10 days of SCR visit. * Concomitant illness or condition which, in the opinion of the Principal - Investigator, places the subject at risk for this study. * The Medical Monitor may declare any subject ineligible for a valid procedural or medical reason.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound Appearance28 daysWeekly wound appearance as assessed by BWAT-m scores. BWAT-m scores used to determine primary efficacy consist of 8 subscales, each grade an aspect of wound status on a 1-5 scale; 1=normal intact skin; 5=least desirable. Total score=8-40. Subscales: Edges, Undermining, Necrotic Tissue Type, Necrotic Tissue Amount, Exudate Type, Exudate Amount, Skin Color Surrounding Wound, and Granulation Tissue.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Change in Wound Area28 days

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Adults aged 18 years and older, with Type I or II diabetes mellitus and at least one inflamed diabetic foot ulcer

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Collagenase Santyl Ointment
Santyl Santyl : Applied once every 24-hr period sufficient to cover the wound.
9
Control
Tegaderm Hydrogel Tegaderm Hydrogel : Applied once every 24-hr period sufficient to cover the wound.
8
Total17

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlCollagenase Santyl OintmentTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Age Continuous58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8
61.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants9 participants17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 93 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 91 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Wound Appearance

Weekly wound appearance as assessed by BWAT-m scores. BWAT-m scores used to determine primary efficacy consist of 8 subscales, each grade an aspect of wound status on a 1-5 scale; 1=normal intact skin; 5=least desirable. Total score=8-40. Subscales: Edges, Undermining, Necrotic Tissue Type, Necrotic Tissue Amount, Exudate Type, Exudate Amount, Skin Color Surrounding Wound, and Granulation Tissue.

Time frame: 28 days

Population: 12 subjects initially for this exploratory study. 17 subjects enrolled to ensure 12 evaluable. Intent-to-treat used for primary inference. Missing values imputed by method of population mean (BWAT-m) and last observation carried forward (wound area).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Collagenase Santyl OintmentWound AppearanceBaseline19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Collagenase Santyl OintmentWound AppearanceWeek 416.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
ControlWound AppearanceBaseline19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
ControlWound AppearanceWeek 414.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Secondary

Percent Change in Wound Area

Time frame: 28 days

Population: Intent-to-Treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Collagenase Santyl OintmentPercent Change in Wound Area-69.9 percentage change from baseline areaStandard Deviation 39
ControlPercent Change in Wound Area-41.6 percentage change from baseline areaStandard Deviation 105

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026