Skip to content

Evaluation of an Intervention for Improving Community-based Pediatric Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Care

Evaluation of an Intervention for Improving Community-based Pediatric ADHD Care

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01143701
Enrollment
577
Registered
2010-06-14
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2016-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ADHD

Brief summary

ADHD is the most prevalent mental health disorder of childhood. The majority of children with ADHD receive their care in primary care settings. While the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issued evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for pediatricians, most pediatricians have difficulty adhering to these guidelines. Given observed deficiencies in evidence-based ADHD care and the likely effects on child outcomes, the development and testing of interventions aimed at improving ADHD care in primary care settings is necessary. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center has developed a model intervention, termed the ADHD Collaborative, to comprehensively address this issue. The ADHD Collaborative intervention model includes academic detailing, quality improvement methods, and innovative tools (e.g., web portal) designed to promote and support the systematic use of the AAP guidelines. This intervention model has been used to train over 200 physicians at 55 practices in the Greater Cincinnati area. The intervention appears to produce 2- to 4-fold increases in the use of evidence-based ADHD-related practice behaviors in participating physicians. To date, the intervention has been implemented as a quality improvement project with few experimental controls. The primary goal of the proposed study is to conduct an experimentally-controlled cluster randomized trial of the ADHD Collaborative intervention. Thirty-two pediatric practices will be randomly assigned to receive the ADHD Collaborative intervention or to provide usual care. Approximately 96 physicians and 576 of their ADHD patients will be included in the study. Chart reviews, parental interviews, and parent and teacher rating scales will be collected. Between- and within-group hierarchical linear modeling analyses will examine whether the intervention produces significant improvements in pediatrician practice behaviors, patient satisfaction with ADHD care, and child outcomes over and above typical ADHD care. Also, the relative cost effectiveness of the ADHD Collaborative intervention over typical care will be established by computing incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using cost and effect size estimates.

Interventions

The ADHD Collaborative intervention model includes academic detailing, quality improvement methods, and innovative tools (e.g., web portal) designed to promote and support the systematic use of the AAP guidelines.

Sponsors

Nationwide Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Practice must have a minimum of two pediatricians who agree to participate. * Practice must have an electronic billing system. * Practice must have internet access at office. * Practice must not have an on-site mental health professional. * Practice must have a member of practice staff willing to be trained in human subjects certification and willing to consent families. * Children must be in Grade 1-5. * Children must be newly diagnosed with ADHD.

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parent-rated ADHD Symptoms12 monthsTotal Symptom Score on Parent-Rated Vanderbilt ADHD Rating Scale (range=0-54). Higher scores represent more severe ADHD symptom presentation.
Teacher-rated ADHD Symptoms12 monthsTotal Symptom Score on Teacher-Rated Vanderbilt ADHD Rating Scale (range=0-54). Higher scores represent more severe ADHD symptom presentation.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ADHD Collaborative Intervention
The ADHD Collaborative intervention model includes academic detailing, quality improvement methods, and innovative tools (e.g., web portal) designed to promote and support the systematic use of the American Academy of Pediatrics consensus recommendation for evidence-based ADHD care. ADHD Collaborative: The ADHD Collaborative intervention model includes academic detailing, quality improvement methods, and innovative tools (e.g., web portal) designed to promote and support the systematic use of the AAP guidelines.
258
Typical ADHD Care
Physicians in this group will provide typical ADHD care.
319
Total577

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicADHD Collaborative InterventionTotalTypical ADHD Care
Age, Continuous7.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
7.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
7.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
252 Participants564 Participants312 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
33 Participants123 Participants90 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
36 Participants71 Participants35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
187 Participants378 Participants191 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
258 participants577 participants319 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
79 Participants170 Participants91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
179 Participants407 Participants228 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2580 / 319
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2580 / 319

Outcome results

Primary

Parent-rated ADHD Symptoms

Total Symptom Score on Parent-Rated Vanderbilt ADHD Rating Scale (range=0-54). Higher scores represent more severe ADHD symptom presentation.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Hierarchical Modeling accounted for clustering of patients nested within providers and providers nested within practices.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADHD Collaborative InterventionParent-rated ADHD Symptoms20.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Typical ADHD CareParent-rated ADHD Symptoms24.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Comparison: Utilizing the full sample (n=577), an intent-to-treat analyses was conducted comparing patient outcomes across intervention and control groups using a three-level mixed model. Baseline ratings were entered as a covariate. Post-baseline ratings collected closest to 12-months post-baseline were entered as dependent variables.p-value: <0.0595% CI: [-5.89, -1.19]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Teacher-rated ADHD Symptoms

Total Symptom Score on Teacher-Rated Vanderbilt ADHD Rating Scale (range=0-54). Higher scores represent more severe ADHD symptom presentation.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Analyses only included patients who had a post-intervention teacher-rated ADHD scale. Hierarchical Modeling accounted for clustering of patients nested within providers and providers nested within practices.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ADHD Collaborative InterventionTeacher-rated ADHD Symptoms19.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Typical ADHD CareTeacher-rated ADHD Symptoms20.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Comparison: An intent-to-treat analyses was conducted comparing patient outcomes across intervention and control groups using a three-level mixed model. Baseline ratings were entered as a covariate. Post-baseline ratings collected closest to 12-months post-baseline were entered as dependent variables.p-value: <0.0595% CI: [-4.71, 1.75]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026