Skip to content

A Phase IV Study of Rebif ® 44mcg Administered Three Times Per Week by Subcutaneous Injection Compared With no Treatment in the Therapy of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis After Mitoxantrone

Phase IV, Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized Study of Rebif® 44mcg Administered Three Times Per Week by Subcutaneous Injection Compared With no Treatment in the Therapy of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis After Mitoxantrone

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01142466
Acronym
REMAIN
Enrollment
30
Registered
2010-06-11
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2014-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis, Expanded Disability Status Scale, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Rebif, Beta-1, interferon

Brief summary

In the course of therapy escalation, the multiple sclerosis (MS) subjects with high activity of disease receive mainly mitoxantrone. The duration of therapy is limited because of a cumulative dose for life (140 mg/m\^2 body surface area). In practice lower doses of mitoxantrone (60-120 mg/m\^2 body surface area) are being used. The specific reason for this limited total dose are potential cardiotoxic side effects of mitoxantrone. Once this cumulative dose of mitoxantrone is reached and the subject becomes stable, there is the question for subsequent therapy. A possibility at this time, is the so-called de-escalation, therefore reducing the subject back to immunomodulating basic treatment. The target of this open-label, randomised, multicentric, comparative, parallel-group study was to inquire systematically into the use and course of basic therapy with Rebif 44 mcg thrice weekly (tiw) for a larger number of subjects.

Detailed description

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, inflammatory, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) and is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young adults. It is characterised by multi-focal recurrent attacks of neurological symptoms and signs with variable recovery. Eventually, the majority of subjects develop a progressive clinical course. The exact cause of MS is unknown, although an autoimmune process has been implicated. Genetic susceptibility plays a role in disease initiation but unidentified environmental factors may also be involved. Three clinical forms of MS are recognized: primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) and relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Primary progressive subjects are characterised by slow and steady accumulation of neurological deficits from onset without superimposed attacks. Subjects with RRMS have exacerbations or relapses with subsequent variable recovery (remission). Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is characterised by the steady accumulation of significant and persistent neurological deficit with or without superimposed relapses. Rebif \[recombinant interferon (IFN) beta-1a\] has been tested in a series of studies in MS subjects at doses ranging from 22 mcg to 132 mcg weekly with a dose frequency ranging from weekly (qw) to tiw. Rebif has been found to be well tolerated in all clinical pharmacology studies, even at high doses (up to 66 mcg/m\^2). In later phase trials, Rebif has been tested across a broad range of doses, for varying duration, and in different stages of MS disease. Dose testing has ranged from 22 mcg to 132 mcg weekly with frequency of administration being qw to tiw. OBJECTIVES Primary objective: * To asses if treatment with Rebif 44 mcg tiw compared with subjects not treated during 96 weeks can maintain or prolong clinical or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) stability after previous treatment with mitoxantrone Secondary objectives: * To compare the mean number of T2 active lesions, defined as new or enlarging T2 lesions, per subject per scan during 96 weeks of treatment with Rebif 44 mcg three times per week with subjects not treated * To assess the safety and efficacy of Rebif 44 mcg This was an open-label, randomised, multicentric, comparative, parallel-group study with a neurologist blinded to treatment for performing neurologic exams and a neuro-radiologist blinded to treatment for assessing central MRI scans. The study was divided into a screening phase (up to 28 days before the start of IFN-beta-1a treatment), a treatment phase of 96 weeks as well as a follow-up period of 4 weeks for subjects with ongoing serious adverse events (SAEs) at week 96. The study consisted of 2 groups to compare the therapeutic effect of high dose, high frequency IFN beta-1a therapy (Rebif 44 mcg) to subjects who will not be treated with Rebif 44 mcg. Subjects of both groups were previously treated with mitoxantrone in the \< 3 months prior to study inclusion. Subjects assigned to no treatment were switched to Rebif 44 mcg x 3 after reaching the primary endpoint or defined stopping criteria. The treatment period of this study begun with the completion of all baseline evaluations and the initiation of study drug treatment on Study Day 1 (baseline visit) and continues through until completion of the treatment period at the Week 96 visit.

Interventions

The dosage of IFN-beta-1a , following initial dose titration, was 44 mcg injected subcutaneously (s.c.) tiw. An auto-injector device, Rebiject, was available as an optional aid for the administration of IFN-beta-1a . IFN-beta-1a was administered, if possible, at the same time (preferably in the late afternoon or evening) on the same three days at least 48 hours apart each week.

Sponsors

Gesellschaft für Therapieforschung mbH
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject who had given written informed consent. * Subjects with definite RRMS or SPMS with relapses * Subjects with EDSS 1-6 * Subjects aged between 18-60 years * Subjects who were escalated to mitoxantrone due to high relapse activity or MRI activity (not due to EDSS progression exclusively) * Subjects who may not have a confirmed 1 point EDSS progression (0.5 points for EDSS \>5.5) within the last 9 months * Subjects free of relapses over the last 6 months * Subjects with last mitoxantrone treatment between 1 and 6 months prior to screening * Subjects treated with mitoxantrone for minimum 9 months and maximum 36 months, total cumulative dose being 40-120 mg/m\^2 * Female subjects who must be neither pregnant nor breast-feeding and must lack childbearing potential, as defined by either: 1. Being post-menopausal or surgically sterile,or 2. Using a hormonal contraceptive, intra-uterine device, diaphragm with spermicide or condom with spermicide for the duration of the study. Confirmation that the subject is not pregnant must be established by a negative serum or urinary human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test within 7 days prior to start of study treatment. A pregnancy test is not required if the subject is post menopausal or surgically sterile.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject who has received any cytokine or anti-cytokine therapy within the 3 months prior to study Day 1 * Subject who has been escalated to mitoxantrone due to EDSS progression * Subject with an ongoing MS relapse * Subject with PPMS * Subject with SPMS without superimposed relapses * Subject who has received immunomodulatory treatment other than IFN-beta or glatiramer acetate before mitoxantrone * Subject who has previously received total lymphoid irradiation * Subject who has received oral or systemic corticosteroids or adrenocorticotrophic hormone ACTH within 30 days of study Day 1 * Subject who has received intravenous immunoglobulins or underwent plasmapheresis within the 6 months prior to study day 1 * Subject who has received immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy (including but not limited to cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, linomide, teriflunomide, natalizumab, laquinimod, Campath) within the 12 months prior to study Day 1 * Subject who requires chronic or monthly pulse corticosteroids during the study * Subject who has received any investigational drug or experimental procedure within 12 month of study Day 1 * Subject who has inadequate liver function, defined by a total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or alkaline phosphatase greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of the normal values. * Subject who has inadequate bone marrow reserve, defined as a white blood cell count less than 0.5 times the lower limit of normal * Subject who suffers from current autoimmune disease * Subject with known allergy to IFN or the excipient(s) * Subject who suffers from major medical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of the investigator creates undue risk to the subject or could affect compliance with the study protocol * Subject treated with drugs other than IFN-beta or glatiramer acetate within 2 years before mitoxantrone * Subject with known cardiac or other systemic diseases * Subjects who are pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time From Baseline to First Multiple Sclerosis Relapse (in Weeks)Baseline through Week 96A qualifying relapse was defined as a new or worsening neurological symptom, in the absence of fever, lasting for \>= 48 hours, and accompanied by an objective change in the relevant (i.e. symptomatic) Kurtzke Functional Systems (KFS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72, and 96Analysis of T1 lesions was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.
Absolute Changes in the Number of T1-Gadolinium (T1-Gd) Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72, and 96Analysis of T1-Gadolinium enhancing lesions was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.
Number of Relapse-free ParticipantsBaseline through Week 96A qualifying relapse was defined as a new or worsening neurological symptom, in the absence of fever, lasting for \>= 48 hours, and accompanied by an objective change in the relevant (i.e. symptomatic) Kurtzke Functional Systems (KFS).
Mean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated. EDSS progression was defined as increase by at least 1 point if last value of EDSS was equal to 5.5, and by at least 0.5 points if last EDSS was more than 5.5.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Baseline to Week 96AE: any new untoward medical occurrence/worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. SAE: any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was a medically important condition.
Absolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72, and 96Analysis of T2 lesions was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at multiple centres in Germany.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 36 participants were screened and 30 were randomized to the study treatment. 6 participants were not treated (4 participants were screening failures and 2 participants did not meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rebif 44 Mcg
Rebif was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) at a dose of 44 microgram (mcg), three times a week.
14
No Treatment
Participants in this group did not receive any treatment.
15
Total29

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event21
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRebif 44 McgNo TreatmentTotal
Age, Continuous43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
44.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)4.1 Units on Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
4.3 Units on Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
4.2 Units on Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants9 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 1514 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 151 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Time From Baseline to First Multiple Sclerosis Relapse (in Weeks)

A qualifying relapse was defined as a new or worsening neurological symptom, in the absence of fever, lasting for \>= 48 hours, and accompanied by an objective change in the relevant (i.e. symptomatic) Kurtzke Functional Systems (KFS).

Time frame: Baseline through Week 96

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants who received at least 1 treatment dose (only for Rebif group) and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint assessment. Time to relapse was documented for participants who had at least 1 relapse during the study period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rebif 44 McgTime From Baseline to First Multiple Sclerosis Relapse (in Weeks)35.5 weeksStandard Deviation 40.8
No TreatmentTime From Baseline to First Multiple Sclerosis Relapse (in Weeks)40.9 weeksStandard Deviation 28.7
Comparison: Two-sided log rank test with alpha equal to 0.05 was used as the appropriate nonparametric method to compare the two groups.p-value: 0.1384Log Rank
Secondary

Absolute Changes in the Number of T1-Gadolinium (T1-Gd) Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96

Analysis of T1-Gadolinium enhancing lesions was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72, and 96

Population: The data was not evaluated due to the small sample size available for this parameter.

Secondary

Absolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96

Analysis of T1 lesions was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72, and 96

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 treatment dose (only for Rebif group) and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint assessment. The 'n' is signifying those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the time point for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rebif 44 McgAbsolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 24 (n= 13,15)-0.5 T1 lesionsStandard Deviation 4.4
Rebif 44 McgAbsolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 48 (n= 13,13)-0.8 T1 lesionsStandard Deviation 4.3
Rebif 44 McgAbsolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 72 (n= 12,12)-0.8 T1 lesionsStandard Deviation 9.2
Rebif 44 McgAbsolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 96 (n= 12,12)-1.8 T1 lesionsStandard Deviation 5.5
No TreatmentAbsolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 96 (n= 12,12)-2.3 T1 lesionsStandard Deviation 11.6
No TreatmentAbsolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 24 (n= 13,15)-0.9 T1 lesionsStandard Deviation 8.9
No TreatmentAbsolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 72 (n= 12,12)-3.6 T1 lesionsStandard Deviation 12
No TreatmentAbsolute Changes in the Number of T1 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 48 (n= 13,13)1.5 T1 lesionsStandard Deviation 11.2
Secondary

Absolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96

Analysis of T2 lesions was done using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72, and 96

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 treatment dose (only for Rebif group) and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint assessment. The 'n' is signifying those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the time point for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rebif 44 McgAbsolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 24 (n= 13,15)-1.2 T2 lesionsStandard Deviation 4
Rebif 44 McgAbsolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 48 (n= 13,13)0.2 T2 lesionsStandard Deviation 8.5
Rebif 44 McgAbsolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 72 (n= 12,13)-1.8 T2 lesionsStandard Deviation 3.3
Rebif 44 McgAbsolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 96 (n= 12,12)-3.1 T2 lesionsStandard Deviation 7.6
No TreatmentAbsolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 96 (n= 12,12)2.1 T2 lesionsStandard Deviation 15.4
No TreatmentAbsolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 24 (n= 13,15)1.0 T2 lesionsStandard Deviation 6
No TreatmentAbsolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 72 (n= 12,13)3.1 T2 lesionsStandard Deviation 14.1
No TreatmentAbsolute Changes in the Number of T2 Lesions From Baseline to Week 24, 48, 72 and 96Week 48 (n= 13,13)3.2 T2 lesionsStandard Deviation 10.1
Secondary

Mean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96

EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated. EDSS progression was defined as increase by at least 1 point if last value of EDSS was equal to 5.5, and by at least 0.5 points if last EDSS was more than 5.5.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 treatment dose (only for Rebif group) and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint assessment. The 'n' is signifying those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the time point for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rebif 44 McgMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 12 (n= 14, 15)-0.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Rebif 44 McgMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 24 (n= 14, 15)0.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Rebif 44 McgMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 36 (n= 13, 14)0.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Rebif 44 McgMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 48 (n= 14, 14)0.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Rebif 44 McgMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 60 (n= 10, 11)0.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Rebif 44 McgMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 72 (n= 12, 13)0.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Rebif 44 McgMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 84 (n= 12, 13)0.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Rebif 44 McgMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 96 (n= 12, 13)0.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
No TreatmentMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 96 (n= 12, 13)0.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1
No TreatmentMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 12 (n= 14, 15)-0.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.4
No TreatmentMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 60 (n= 10, 11)0.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1
No TreatmentMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 24 (n= 14, 15)0.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.4
No TreatmentMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 84 (n= 12, 13)0.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
No TreatmentMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 36 (n= 13, 14)-0.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.4
No TreatmentMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 72 (n= 12, 13)0.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
No TreatmentMean Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score From Baseline to Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96Week 48 (n= 14, 14)0.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

AE: any new untoward medical occurrence/worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. SAE: any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was a medically important condition.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 96

Population: Safety population included all participants all randomized participants of the active treatment group who received at least 1 injection and all randomized participants of the 'No Treatment' group, provided that any post-baseline data was available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rebif 44 McgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Adverse Events15 participants
Rebif 44 McgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Serious Adverse Events5 participants
No TreatmentNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Adverse Events14 participants
No TreatmentNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Serious Adverse Events1 participants
Secondary

Number of Relapse-free Participants

A qualifying relapse was defined as a new or worsening neurological symptom, in the absence of fever, lasting for \>= 48 hours, and accompanied by an objective change in the relevant (i.e. symptomatic) Kurtzke Functional Systems (KFS).

Time frame: Baseline through Week 96

Population: ITT population included all participants who received at least 1 treatment dose (only for Rebif group) and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rebif 44 McgNumber of Relapse-free Participants10 participants
No TreatmentNumber of Relapse-free Participants7 participants
p-value: 0.2635Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026