Skip to content

Polypropylene Mesh Versus Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Mesh in Inguinal Hernia Repair

Lichtenstein's Repair of Inguinal Hernia With Polypropylene Mesh Versus Infinit® PTFE Mesh, a Prospective Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01141335
Enrollment
70
Registered
2010-06-10
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2016-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Function, Pain, Hernia, Wound Infection, Postoperative Complication, Recurrence

Keywords

shrinkage, postoperative pain and discomfort

Brief summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Lichtenstein's hernioplasty using Infinit® PTFE Mesh, and to compare it with the traditional Lichtenstein procedure performed with polypropylene mesh.

Interventions

A Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty is performed using a polypropylene mesh will be fixed by sutures in Polypropylene 2/0.

DEVICEInfinit® PTFE mesh (WL Gore)

A Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty is performed using a PTFE mesh will be fixed by sutures in PTFE 2/0.

Sponsors

University of Roma La Sapienza
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>18 \<65 years of age * Diagnosis of Unilateral inguinal hernia * Able to provide written consent * BMI \< 35 * ASA I-II patients * Non-complicated primary inguinal hernia performed in non-emergency setting and repaired with a Lichtenstein's hernioplasty * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Recurrent hernias * Incarcerated hernia * BMI \> 35 * ASA III-IV patients * Any condition preventing a correct evaluation of pain (non-cooperative patient, blind patient, drug addicted) * Hypersensitivity to any drug in study * Patients with an intra-operative findings of different pathology will be excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
post-hernioplasty acute pain24 hoursto measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative acute discomfort24 hoursto measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
wound infection7 daysto rate the wound infection risk.
postoperative complicationfrom 24 hours to 5 yearsto monitor any other postoperative complication observed in the immediate, mid-term and long-term postoperative period.
recurrencefrom 1 months to 5 yearsto measure the recurrence
physical function24 hoursto measure the physical function score from the SF-36 questionnaire
post-hernioplasty acute pain72 hoursto measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
post-hernioplasty chronic pain1 monthsto measure the degree of post-hernioplasty acute and chronic pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), and parenteral/oral analgesic consumption in the two groups
postoperative chronic discomfort1 monthsto measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
postoperative acute and chronic discomfort7 daysto measure the degree of postoperative acute and chronic discomfort with visual analogue scale (VAS).
mesh shrinkage14 daysto measure the effectiveness shrinkage of the two different mesh using Ultrasound

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026