Skip to content

Dexmedetomidine for the Treatment of Delirium After Heart Surgery

A Prospective, Multi-centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Haloperidol in Treatment of Psychomotor Confusion After Heart Surgery

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01140529
Acronym
DexinDelir
Enrollment
3
Registered
2010-06-09
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2016-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Confusion, Delirium, Postoperative, Psychomotor

Keywords

Dexmedetomidine

Brief summary

Primary hypothesis: Dexmedetomidine is equal or superior to haloperidol and placebo in the treatment of psychomotor confusion in patients who are recovering from heart surgery. Study design: Multi-centre, prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled double-blind study of dexmedetomidine vs. haloperidol for treatment of psychomotor confusion after cardiac surgery. Data will be analyzed in two steps: The primary comparison is between placebo and dexmedetomidine. If the effect of dexmedetomidine is significant, a secondary comparison between dexmedetomidine and haloperidol will follow.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine

Bolus and continuous infusion

DRUGHaloperidol

Bolus doses

DRUGSaline

Bolus and continuous infusion

Sponsors

Thorax-Kärlkliniken
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 65 years * Clinical need for treatment of psychomotor confusion unresponsive to standard analgesic medication (RASS +2 to +3) * Heart surgery and extracorporeal circulation (ECC) within 7 days * Written informed consent obtained before surgery * Mentally competent at the time of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Ongoing neuroleptic, propofol and α2 agonist medication * Intubated patient * Uncompensated acute circulatory failure at time of randomisation (severe hypotension with mean arterial pressure \< 55 mmHg despite volume, vasopressors and IABP) * Severe bradycardia without pacemaker backup (heart rate \< 50 beats/min) * AV-conduction block II-III (without pacemaker backup) * Severe hepatic impairment (Serum bilirubin \> 101 µmol/l) * Lithium therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Need for rescue medication72 hours

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026