Skip to content

Hybrid-everted Versus Hand-sewn or Stapled Esophagogastrostomy in Prevention of Anastomotic Stricture

Phase III Study of Hybrid-everted Versus Hand-sewn of Stapled Esophagogastrostomy in Prevention of Anastomotic Stricture

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01139229
Enrollment
144
Registered
2010-06-08
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2010-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Neoplasms, Surgical Stomas

Keywords

Esophagogastrostomy, Circular everted anastomosis, Side-side anastomosis, Randomized clinical trial

Brief summary

The investigators improved the hybrid everted esophagogastrostomy and expected to prevent the incidence of anastomotic stricture. The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical value of this kind of operation type, and analyzes the clinicopathological factors causing the postoperative complications.

Detailed description

This randomized clinical trial compared a hybrid everted esophagogastric anastomosis with conventional hand-sewn or stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. The patients were completely randomized to receive either a hybrid everted esophagogastric anastomosis (HE group), or the conventional hand-sewn (HS group), or a stapled (SA group) anastomosis, after the removal of esophageal tumor. The primary outcome measured the incidence of anastomotic stricture at 3 months after the operation (defined as the diameter of the anastomotic orifice \<= 0.8 cm on esophagogram), analyzed by intention-to-treat.

Interventions

OTHERhybrid everted esophagogastric anastomosis
OTHERthe conventional hand-sewn anastomosis
OTHERa stapled anastomosis

Sponsors

Sichuan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* pathologically diagnosed esophageal neoplasms * undergoing the Esophagogastrostomy

Exclusion criteria

* the patients with previous the upper gastrointestinal tract surgery * the esophageal carcinoma patients with previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy * the esophageal carcinoma complicated other esophagogastric diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the incidence of anastomotic stricturethree monthsthe anastomotic stricture is defined as the diameter of the anastomotic orifice \<= 0.8 cm on esophagogram

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The grades of dysphagiathree months0:No dysphagia on solid diet 1. dysphagia on solid diet 2. dyspahgia on semi-solid diet 3. dysphagia on fluid diet 4. dysphagia with water swallowing
the grades of acid regurgitationthree months0:no reflux on semi-supine position 1. postprandial reflux on semi-supine position 2. reflux with empty stomatch on semi-supine position 3. postprandial reflux on upright position 4. reflux with empty stomach on upright positino
the clinicopathological parameters in relation to postoperative complicationsthree months

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026