Skip to content

Split-Face Tolerability Comparison Between MetroGel® 1% Versus Finacea® 15% in Subjects With Healthy Skin

Split-Face Tolerability Comparison Between MetroGel® (Metronidazole Gel) 1% Versus Finacea® (Azelaic Acid) Gel 15% in Subjects With Healthy Skin

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01139008
Enrollment
80
Registered
2010-06-08
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2022-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Manifestations

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability of MetroGel® (metronidazole gel) 1% to Finacea® (azelaic acid) Gel 15% in subjects with healthy skin applied according to product labeling for three weeks.

Interventions

Apply topically on one side of the face once daily for three weeks

Apply topically on the opposite side of the face twice daily for three weeks

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy male and female adults (ages 18 years or older) * Subjects with healthy skin as determined by the clinical grader

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with a degree of skin pigmentation that interferes with the reading of skin reactions * Subjects with known allergy to one of the components of the study drugs (refer to the package inserts for MetroGel® 1% and Finacea® Gel 15%) * Subjects who have participated in another investigational drug or device research study within 30 days of enrollment * Subjects with a washout period for topical treatment on the treated area less than 1 week for corticosteroids and/or 4 weeks for retinoids * Subjects with a washout period for systemic treatment less than 1 week for medications that may increase photosensitivity and/or 4 weeks for corticosteroids and/or 6 months for retinoids * Subjects with current sunburn, eczema, atopic dermatitis, perioral dermatitis, rosacea, or other topical conditions on the area to be treated * Subjects who foresee unprotected and intense UV exposure during the study (mountain sports, UV radiation, sunbathing, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3baseline to week 3Number of participants who were a success with regard to worst post-baseline tolerability assessment scores in each of the tolerability assessments at any time point between baseline and week 3. Tolerability assessments (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) are evaluated on a scale from 0 - 4 (0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe) with 0 being best and 4 being worst. Success was defined as a tolerability score of 0.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22.Day 22Number of participants who were a success with regard to worst-baseline tolerability assessment scores for each assessment (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) on day 22. Tolerability assessments (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) are evaluated on a scale from 0 - 4 (0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe) with 0 being best and 4 being worst. Success was defined as a tolerability score of 0 for each assessment.
6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 3week 3Number of participants per response to each question of the Subject Preference Survey at week 3

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Dates of recruitment period: First subject was enrolled on June 7, 2010 and the last subject was enrolled on June 7, 2010. Types of location: Investigative site was located at a research center.

Pre-assignment details

Wash-out period up to baseline for topical treatment on the treated area was less than 1 week for corticosteroids and/or 4 weeks for retinoids; for systemic treatment less than 1 week for medications that may increase photosensitivity and/or 4 weeks for corticosteroids and/or 6 months for retinoids.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MetroGel® 1% and Finacea® Gel 15%
This was a randomized split-face study where metronidazole gel 1% was applied topically to one side of the face once daily for 3 weeks and azelaic acid gel 15% was applied to the opposite side of the face twice daily for 3 weeks
80
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyNon-compliant, lost product1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMetroGel® 1% and Finacea® Gel 15%
Age, Continuous45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.16
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 800 / 80
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 800 / 80

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3

Number of participants who were a success with regard to worst post-baseline tolerability assessment scores in each of the tolerability assessments at any time point between baseline and week 3. Tolerability assessments (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) are evaluated on a scale from 0 - 4 (0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe) with 0 being best and 4 being worst. Success was defined as a tolerability score of 0.

Time frame: baseline to week 3

Population: Safety

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MetroGel® 1%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3Erythema14 participants
MetroGel® 1%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3Dryness71 participants
MetroGel® 1%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3Stinging/Burning72 participants
MetroGel® 1%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3Scaling79 participants
Finacea® Gel 15%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3Stinging/Burning65 participants
Finacea® Gel 15%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3Erythema11 participants
Finacea® Gel 15%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3Scaling78 participants
Finacea® Gel 15%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst Post-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) From Baseline to Week 3Dryness70 participants
Secondary

6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 3

Number of participants per response to each question of the Subject Preference Survey at week 3

Time frame: week 3

Population: Safety

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 36. Which product tell a friend about Finacea®?26 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 36. Which product tell a friend about Both?25 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 36. Which product tell a friend about Neither?11 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 36. Which product tell a friend about Missing2 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 31. Side of face felt better MetroGel®16 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 31. Side of face felt better Finacea®20 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 31. Side of face both felt same31 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 31. Side of face neither felt better11 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 31. Side of face Missing2 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 32. Overall impression of MetroGel® Very pleasant16 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 32. Overall impression of MetroGel® Pleasant25 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 32. Overall impression of MetroGel® Okay32 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 32. Overall impression of MetroGel® Unpleasant3 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 32. Overall impression of MetroGel® Very Unpleasant2 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 32. Overall impression of MetroGel® Missing2 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 33. Overall impression of Finacea® Very pleasant15 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 33. Overall impression of Finacea® Pleasant33 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 33. Overall impression of Finacea® Okay25 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 33. Overall impression of Finacea® Unpleasant4 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 33. Overall impression of Finacea® Very unpleasant1 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 33. Overall impression of Finacea® Missing2 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 34. Side of face more sensitive MetroGel®12 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 34. Side of face more sensitive Finacea®27 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 34. Side of face more sensitive both felt same10 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 34. Side of face more sensitive Neither29 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 34. Side of face more sensitive Missing2 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 35. Which side was easier to use MetroGel®?18 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 35. Which side was easier to use Finacea®?21 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 35. Which side was easier to use both equal?38 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 35. Which side was easier to use Neither?1 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 35. Which side was easier to use Missing2 participants
MetroGel® 1%6 Question Subject Preference Survey at Week 36. Which product tell a friend about MetroGel®?16 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22.

Number of participants who were a success with regard to worst-baseline tolerability assessment scores for each assessment (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) on day 22. Tolerability assessments (erythema, scaling, dryness, stinging/burning) are evaluated on a scale from 0 - 4 (0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe) with 0 being best and 4 being worst. Success was defined as a tolerability score of 0 for each assessment.

Time frame: Day 22

Population: Safety

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MetroGel® 1%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22.Erythema34 participants
MetroGel® 1%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22.Scaling74 participants
MetroGel® 1%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22.Dryness73 participants
MetroGel® 1%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22.Stinging/Burning72 participants
Finacea® Gel 15%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22.Stinging/Burning68 participants
Finacea® Gel 15%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22.Dryness73 participants
Finacea® Gel 15%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22.Erythema29 participants
Finacea® Gel 15%Number of Participants Who Were a Success With Regard to Worst-baseline Tolerability Assessment Scores in Each Assessment (Erythema, Scaling, Dryness, Stinging/Burning) on Day 22.Scaling73 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026