Skip to content

Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Safety of 2 Different Doses of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in in HIV/Tuberculosis (TB) Co-infected Patients Receiving Rifampicin Containing Anti-tuberculosis Therapy

A Pilot Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir 400/100mg Bid Versus Lopinavir/Ritonavir 600/150 mg BID Combined With Nucleoside Analogue Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in HIV/TB Co-infected Patients Receiving Rifampicin Containing Anti-tuberculosis Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01138202
Enrollment
40
Registered
2010-06-07
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2020-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections, Tuberculosis

Keywords

pharmacokinetics, safety, efficacy, Lopinavir/ritonavir, HIV/TB, rifampicin containing anti-tuberculosis therapy, Pharmacokinetics and safety of Lopinavir/ritonavir with rifampicin containing anti-tuberculosis therapy

Brief summary

To assess safety, efficacy and impact of Lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg bid or Lopinavir/ritonavir 600/150mg bid in combination with rifampicin-containing anti-TB therapy.

Detailed description

Fixed dose combination of d4T+3TC+NVP (GPOvir) is widely used in Thai HIV infected since June 2002. The prevalence of NNRTI resistance has increased since 2005. Tuberculosis can develop following NNRTI-based regimen failure or after introduction of a new salvage regimen with a boosted PI (immune recovery syndrome). Although, Efavirenz based HAART is preferred in TB/HIV with rifampicin containing antituberculosis. However, Efavirenz could not be used in case of NNRTI failure, intolerance or toxicity. It remains unknown how to optimally treat HIV /TB in populations in which rifampicin has to be used. Moreover, Rifabutin which is recommended when use concomitant with boosted PI4, 5, is not feasible in Thailand and other developing countries due to cost, toxicity and dosing considerations. If ritonavir-boosted LPV demonstrates suitable pharmacokinetics, and is well tolerated, this regimen might prove extremely useful and could be widely implemented. LPV/r is potent and widely available boosted PI in National Health System in Thailand. We therefore believe that there is a strong rationale and impetus for the study of LPV/r 400/100 mg bid versus LPV/r 600/150 mg bid as a boosted-PI combination that in the presence of RMP, is able to produce a satisfactory PK profile associated with adequate antiretroviral potency, tolerability and efficacy .

Interventions

DRUGLPV/r

LPV/r 400/100 mg BID + 2 NRTI for arm 1 (total 48 weeks) LPV/r 600/150 mg BID + 2 NRTI for arm 2 (total 48 weeks)

Sponsors

Ministry of Health, Thailand
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Confirmed HIV positive after voluntary counseling and testing 2. Aged \>18-60years of age 3. ARV naïve and NNRTI failure ( PI naive) 4. CD4+ cell count of \<350 cells/mm3 at the time of diagnosed TB 5. ALT \<5 times ULN 6. Serum creatinine \<1.4 mg/dl 7. Hemoglobin \>8 mg/L 8. TB is diagnosed and planned to receive stable doses of rifampicin-containing anti-TB therapy for at least a 2 week period after initiation of ART 9. No other active OI (CDC class C event), except oral candidiasis or disseminated MAC 10. Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Current use of steroid (except short course steroid for IRIS) and other immunosuppressive agents. 2. Current use of any prohibited medications related to drug pharmacokinetics. 3. Patients with current alcohol or illicit substance use that in the opinion of the site Principal Investigator would conflict with any aspect of the conduct of the trial. 4. Unlikely to be able to remain in follow-up for the protocol defined period. 5. Patients with proven or suspected acute hepatitis. Patients with chronic viral hepatitis are eligible provided ALT, AST \< 5 x ULN. 6. Karnofsky performance score \<30%

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
plasma concentration level12 hoursPercentage of plasma concentration level above an acceptable lower limit (lopinavir Cmin \> 1 mg/L) at steady-state.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
identify toxicities48 weeksToxicity of combined treatment for TB and HIV infections - the established DAIDS/ACTG toxicity grading scale of clinical and laboratory toxicities will be used.
CD448 weeksCD4 response (mean CD4 rise from baseline)
HIV RNA48 weeksHIV RNA response (% \< 50 copies/ml at week 12, 24 and 48)
genotypic resistant48 weeksThe emergence of NRTI and/or lopinavir genotypic resistant and its clinically

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026