Skip to content

A Study in Asthmatic Children (6 to <12 Yrs) Comparing Single Doses of Formoterol and Foradil® Evaluating Efficacy

A Phase 2, Randomized, Blinded, 5-period Cross-over, Placebo and Active Controlled, Multicenter, Dose-finding Study Comparing Single Doses of Formoterol 2.25 µg, 4.5 µg, and 9 µg Delivered Via Symbicort pMDI and Foradil® 12 µg Evaluating the Relative Bronchodilating Effects and Safety in Children

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01136655
Acronym
CHASE 2
Enrollment
54
Registered
2010-06-03
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2013-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

asthmatic children, Symbicort, Foradil

Brief summary

This purpose of the study is to investigate the bronchodilating effects of 3 different dosages of formoterol given in combination with budesonide as Symbicort pMDI.

Detailed description

A Phase 2, randomized, blinded, 5-period cross-over, placebo and active controlled, multicenter, dose-finding study comparing single doses of formoterol 2.25 µg, 4.5 µg, and 9 µg delivered via Symbicort pMDI and Foradil® 12 µg evaluating the relative bronchodilating effects and safety in children.

Interventions

DRUG80/2.25 μg Symbicort pMDI

inhalation

DRUG80/4.5 μg Symbicort pMDI

inhalation

DRUGForadil Aerolizer 12 μg

inhalation

DRUG40 μg budesonide HFA pMDI

inhalation

DRUGplacebo HFA pMDI

inhalation

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has a documented clinical diagnosis of asthma for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1 * Has a FEV1 measured at least 6 hours after the last dose of inhaled, short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) and at least 48 hours after the last dose of inhaled long-acting β2-agonist of =60% and =85% of predicted normal. * Demonstrated reversibility of FEV1 of =15% from pre short acting beta agonist level within 15 to 30 minutes after administration of a standard dose of short acting beta agonist

Exclusion criteria

* Has been hospitalized for \>24 hours at least once or required emergency treatment or urgent care visit more than once for an asthma-related condition during the 6 months prior to Visit 1 * Has required treatment with systemic corticosteroids (eg, oral, parenteral, or rectal) for any reason within the 12 weeks prior to Visit 1.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average 12 Hour Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)at 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes postdosePulmonary function tests consisted of 3 forced expiratory maneuvers in which the patient expired forcefully from total lung capacity to residual volume, recorded using a spirometer. FEV1 was obtained from the full expiratory flow-volume-time curve. FEV1 was measured at 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes post administration of randomized study medication. Twelve-hour serial FEV1 was calculated through an AUC determination and then divided by time, so that the final value is expressed in liters. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FEV1 at 12 Hours After Study Medication Inhalation12 hours after dosingPulmonary function tests consisted of 3 forced expiratory maneuvers in which the patient expired forcefully from total lung capacity to residual volume, recorded using a spirometer. The FEV1 value at 12 hours after dosing was taken as the 12-hour measurement (720 minutes) from the serial spirometry. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0.
Maximal FEV1 During the 12-hour Study Periodat 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes postdosePulmonary function tests consisted of 3 forced expiratory maneuvers in which the patient expired forcefully from total lung capacity to residual volume, recorded using a spirometer. FEV1 was measured at 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes post administration of randomized study medication. The maximum FEV1 value was defined as the largest observed FEV1 value recorded during each 12-hour serial spirometry procedure. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0.
Urinary Excretion of Formoterol During the 12 Hours Following Inhalation of Study Drug0 to 12 hoursThe amount of formoterol excreted unchanged in urine over the 12-hour period after administration \[Ae(0-12h)\] was calculated from the concentration of formoterol in urine multiplied by the total volume of urine collected. Volume was determined from the weight of the collected urine times an assumed urine density of 1020 g/L. The data for six patients who did not have measurable formoterol in their urine on the Foradil 12 μg treatment day was excluded from the analysis. All other urine concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were set to zero. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0.

Countries

Bulgaria, Czechia, Hungary, Poland, South Africa, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This multicenter study was conducted in Europe and the United States between 7 October 2010 and 3 January 2012.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of a screening visit, an enrolment visit, a 1- to 2-week run-in (standardization) period, randomization at Visit 3, and 4 further visits (Visits 4-7)separated by approximately 7-day (minimum 3 days; maximum 14 days) wash-out (stabilization) periods. Subjects received 1 of 5 single-dose treatments at Visits 3-7, in random order.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Randomized Patients
All randomized patients
54
Total54

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Washout After BUD 160/FM 2.25 (7 Days)Withdrawal by Subject1
Washout After BUD 160/FM 4.5 (7 Days)Adverse Event1
Washout After BUD 160/FM 9.0 (7 Days)Adverse Event1
Washout After BUD 160/FM 9.0 (7 Days)Withdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRandomized Patients
Age Continuous9.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.79
Age, Customized
>=6 to <8 years
11 participants
Age, Customized
>=8 to < 12 years
43 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 541 / 535 / 532 / 510 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 540 / 530 / 530 / 510 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Average 12 Hour Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

Pulmonary function tests consisted of 3 forced expiratory maneuvers in which the patient expired forcefully from total lung capacity to residual volume, recorded using a spirometer. FEV1 was obtained from the full expiratory flow-volume-time curve. FEV1 was measured at 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes post administration of randomized study medication. Twelve-hour serial FEV1 was calculated through an AUC determination and then divided by time, so that the final value is expressed in liters. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0.

Time frame: at 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes postdose

Population: Efficacy analysis set including all patients who were randomized (defined as having a randomization code recorded on the demography case report form), received at least one dose of study medication, and contributed sufficient data for at least one efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BUD 160/FM 2.25Average 12 Hour Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)1.546 litersStandard Error 0.0097
BUD 160/FM 4.5Average 12 Hour Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)1.594 litersStandard Error 0.0099
BUD 160/FM 9.0Average 12 Hour Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)1.603 litersStandard Error 0.0099
BUD 160Average 12 Hour Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)1.489 litersStandard Error 0.0101
BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0Average 12 Hour Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)1.603 litersStandard Error 0.0101
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.087, 0.142]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.078, 0.133]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.000195% CI: [0.03, 0.085]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.522395% CI: [-0.036, 0.018]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-0.084, -0.029]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.000795% CI: [-0.075, -0.02]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.142, -0.086]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-0.084, -0.028]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.539495% CI: [-0.036, 0.019]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.986395% CI: [-0.027, 0.028]ANCOVA
Secondary

FEV1 at 12 Hours After Study Medication Inhalation

Pulmonary function tests consisted of 3 forced expiratory maneuvers in which the patient expired forcefully from total lung capacity to residual volume, recorded using a spirometer. The FEV1 value at 12 hours after dosing was taken as the 12-hour measurement (720 minutes) from the serial spirometry. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0.

Time frame: 12 hours after dosing

Population: Efficacy analysis set including all patients who were randomized (defined as having a randomization code recorded on the demography case report form), received at least one dose of study medication, and contributed sufficient data for at least one efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BUD 160/FM 2.25FEV1 at 12 Hours After Study Medication Inhalation1.641 litersStandard Error 0.0175
BUD 160/FM 4.5FEV1 at 12 Hours After Study Medication Inhalation1.692 litersStandard Error 0.0177
BUD 160/FM 9.0FEV1 at 12 Hours After Study Medication Inhalation1.731 litersStandard Error 0.0177
BUD 160FEV1 at 12 Hours After Study Medication Inhalation1.626 litersStandard Error 0.0181
BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0FEV1 at 12 Hours After Study Medication Inhalation1.709 litersStandard Error 0.0182
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.056, 0.155]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.009295% CI: [0.017, 0.116]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.550995% CI: [-0.035, 0.065]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.116395% CI: [-0.088, 0.01]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-0.14, -0.041]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.0495% CI: [-0.1, -0.002]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.001195% CI: [-0.133, -0.034]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.007795% CI: [-0.118, -0.018]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.495795% CI: [-0.067, 0.033]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANCOVA model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.3895% CI: [-0.027, 0.071]ANCOVA
Secondary

Maximal FEV1 During the 12-hour Study Period

Pulmonary function tests consisted of 3 forced expiratory maneuvers in which the patient expired forcefully from total lung capacity to residual volume, recorded using a spirometer. FEV1 was measured at 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes post administration of randomized study medication. The maximum FEV1 value was defined as the largest observed FEV1 value recorded during each 12-hour serial spirometry procedure. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0.

Time frame: at 3, 9, 15, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, 600 and 720 minutes postdose

Population: Efficacy analysis set including all patients who were randomized (defined as having a randomization code recorded on the demography case report form), received at least one dose of study medication, and contributed sufficient data for at least one efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BUD 160/FM 2.25Maximal FEV1 During the 12-hour Study Period1.833 litersStandard Error 0.0119
BUD 160/FM 4.5Maximal FEV1 During the 12-hour Study Period1.889 litersStandard Error 0.012
BUD 160/FM 9.0Maximal FEV1 During the 12-hour Study Period1.884 litersStandard Error 0.012
BUD 160Maximal FEV1 During the 12-hour Study Period1.777 litersStandard Error 0.0123
BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0Maximal FEV1 During the 12-hour Study Period1.892 litersStandard Error 0.0123
Comparison: Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.073, 0.14]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.078, 0.146]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.001195% CI: [0.023, 0.09]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.758995% CI: [-0.028, 0.039]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.003595% CI: [-0.084, -0.017]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.001195% CI: [-0.089, -0.022]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.149, -0.081]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.000895% CI: [-0.092, -0.024]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.858295% CI: [-0.037, 0.031]ANCOVA
Comparison: Factors in the Analysis of Covariance model included: patient, visit, treatment, and the covariate pre-dose FEV1 from each visit.p-value: 0.627695% CI: [-0.042, 0.025]ANCOVA
Secondary

Urinary Excretion of Formoterol During the 12 Hours Following Inhalation of Study Drug

The amount of formoterol excreted unchanged in urine over the 12-hour period after administration \[Ae(0-12h)\] was calculated from the concentration of formoterol in urine multiplied by the total volume of urine collected. Volume was determined from the weight of the collected urine times an assumed urine density of 1020 g/L. The data for six patients who did not have measurable formoterol in their urine on the Foradil 12 μg treatment day was excluded from the analysis. All other urine concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were set to zero. One subject was incorrectly administered BUD 160/ formoterol (FM) 9.0 rather than BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0 at Period 4. Hence this subject is included in the Efficacy Analysis Set, but not the Safety Analysis Set for BUD 160/ Foradil 12.0.

Time frame: 0 to 12 hours

Population: Efficacy analysis set including all patients who were randomized (defined as having a randomization code recorded on the demography case report form), received at least one dose of study medication, and contributed sufficient data for at least one efficacy endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
BUD 160/FM 2.25Urinary Excretion of Formoterol During the 12 Hours Following Inhalation of Study Drug192.0 pmol
BUD 160/FM 4.5Urinary Excretion of Formoterol During the 12 Hours Following Inhalation of Study Drug366.3 pmol
BUD 160/FM 9.0Urinary Excretion of Formoterol During the 12 Hours Following Inhalation of Study Drug740.6 pmol
BUD 160Urinary Excretion of Formoterol During the 12 Hours Following Inhalation of Study Drug658.7 pmol
Comparison: Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.393, 0.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.194, 0.347]ANOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.214, 0.396]ANOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.371, 0.659]ANOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment.p-value: 0.000295% CI: [0.409, 0.755]ANOVA
Comparison: Factors in the ANOVA model included: patient, period and treatment.p-value: 0.451295% CI: [0.827, 1.528]ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026