Skip to content

Safety, Efficacy and Cost-efficacy of Ranibizumab (Monotherapy or Combination With Laser) in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)

A Canadian 12-month, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Laser-controlled Phase IIIb Study Assessing the Efficacy, Safety and Cost-efficacy of Ranibizumab as Combination and Monotherapy in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01135914
Acronym
RESPOND
Enrollment
241
Registered
2010-06-03
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2014-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Keywords

DME, visual impairment, diabetes, macular edema, diabetic macular edema, ranibizumab, laser, photocoagulation, retinopathy, retina

Brief summary

To evaluate, specifically within the Canadian medical environment, the efficacy, safety and cost-efficacy of ranibizumab administered either as combination therapy (ranibizumab plus laser photocoagulation), or as monotherapy in comparison with the current standard of care (laser photocoagulation monotherapy), in patients with visual impairment due to DME.

Interventions

DRUGranibizumab

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg fixed loading dose via intravitreal injection, given once per month for 3 consecutive months (Day 1, Month 1 and Month 2). This treatment could be reapllied, depending on symptoms.

PROCEDURELaser

Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1. Subsequent laser treatments could be administered if needed, in accordance with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) guidelines.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stable Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus * Visual impairment due to focal or diffuse DME in at least one eye

Exclusion criteria

* Active conditions in the study eye that could prevent the improvement of visual acuity on study treatment * Active eye infection or inflammation * History of stroke, renal failure or uncontrolled hypertension Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 12Baseline and 12 monthsBest-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 monthsOCT is a diagnostic imaging technique using low-coherence interferometry to produce cross-sectional tomograms of the posterior segment eye structures. OCT was performed prior to study treatment to assess CRT, presence of fluid in the macula (intra-retinal cyst or fluid) and evaluation of image to monitor disease progression/treatment effect and to determine the need to stop/re-initiate ranibizumab treatment
Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineBaseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 monthsBest-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A higher percent of patients achieving a gain of ≥15 letters BCVA indicates a better response.
Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA12 monthsBest-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A gain of 5,10,15 or more BCVA letters from baseline indicates improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 monthsBest-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS)is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.
EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 1212 monthThe Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) standardized instrument was utilized to measure health outcomes related to 5 dimensions, namely: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain-discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The possible range for each dimension was 1 to 3, where 1=no problems, 2=some problems and 3=extreme problems. Missing values were not imputed. Using the scoring algorithm derived from the Canadian value sets (Bansback et al., 2012), a utility score for a patient was calculated based on the EQ-5D responses for a given time-point at which the questionnaire was presented to the patient. This mean EQ-5D utility score ranged between 0 (worst health) to 1 (perfect health).
Time Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 1212 month(TTO) questionnaire was used to help determine the patients' health utility. Reported health utility represents the patients' quality of life at the current health state, and is a cardinal value that ranges from 0 (worst possible health or death) to 1 (best possible health). In this questionnaire, patients were first asked to estimate their remaining life expectancy. Second, the patients were presented with a hypothetical situation where a technology existed that could permanently return their vision to normal. This technology would always work, but would decrease their length of survival. Patients were then asked how much of their remaining life expectancy, if any, they would be willing to trade in return for use of the technology and thus for normal vision. The principle of this measure is that if patients were content with their current vision status (i.e., have a utility value of 1.0), they would not want to trade any of their remaining life years to improve their vision.
National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 1212 monthThe National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) was used to measure the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains. The 12 subscales in the VFQ-25 are general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision. For each question, the patient was asked to rate their condition on a scale of 1-5 or 1-6, where a low number reflects a better outcome. A composite score for a patient is calculated by aggregating and averaging the scores from the 11 sub-scales (excluding general health sub-scale), and an algorithm is apply to give equal weight to each sub-scale. Sub-scales and composite scores are calculated by converting the response from questionnaires into a 0-100 scale, with 0 as the worst possible outcome and 100 as the best. Missing data was not imputed

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 239 patients were enrolled in the study. An additional 2 patients were enrolled but were removed from the database because consent was not signed in accordance with GCP principles.

Pre-assignment details

3 treatment arms: Group C - laser photocoagulation per ETDRS guidelines, Group B - ranibizumab intravitreal injections (3 monthly injections during loading phase, and subsequent treatments per protocol-defined criteria), or Group A - combination therapy, where decisions to treat with laser were independent of decisions to treat with ranibizumab.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Combination Therapy
Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments.
73
Ranibizumab Monotherapy
Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only
75
Laser Monotherapy
Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only
72
Total220

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event012
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2110
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up101
Overall StudyProtocol Violation003
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject136

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCombination TherapyRanibizumab MonotherapyLaser MonotherapyTotal
Age, Continuous60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.21
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86
62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.44
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.83
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants33 Participants29 Participants88 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
47 Participants42 Participants43 Participants132 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 7326 / 7517 / 74
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 7310 / 755 / 74

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 12

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

Population: ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combination TherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 128.2 LettersStandard Deviation 9.2
Ranibizumab MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 128.9 LettersStandard Deviation 7.78
Laser MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 120.3 LettersStandard Deviation 12.47
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12

OCT is a diagnostic imaging technique using low-coherence interferometry to produce cross-sectional tomograms of the posterior segment eye structures. OCT was performed prior to study treatment to assess CRT, presence of fluid in the macula (intra-retinal cyst or fluid) and evaluation of image to monitor disease progression/treatment effect and to determine the need to stop/re-initiate ranibizumab treatment

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Population: The ITT population was defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one site were excluded from ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 9 (69,70,58)-138.1 umStandard Deviation 125.86
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 6 (n= 70,72,65)-114.2 umStandard Deviation 110.88
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Baseline422.1 umStandard Deviation 142.26
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 3 (n=71,75, 69)-105.7 umStandard Deviation 127.74
Combination TherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 12 (70,71,61)-152.2 umStandard Deviation 139.27
Ranibizumab MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 6 (n= 70,72,65)-129.3 umStandard Deviation 116.5
Ranibizumab MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Baseline448.5 umStandard Deviation 136.64
Ranibizumab MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 3 (n=71,75, 69)-108.9 umStandard Deviation 113.38
Ranibizumab MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 9 (69,70,58)-135.9 umStandard Deviation 140.9
Ranibizumab MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 12 (70,71,61)-143.5 umStandard Deviation 143.95
Laser MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 12 (70,71,61)-107.1 umStandard Deviation 143.86
Laser MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 9 (69,70,58)-85.8 umStandard Deviation 128
Laser MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Baseline458.0 umStandard Deviation 133.07
Laser MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 6 (n= 70,72,65)-64.4 umStandard Deviation 110.77
Laser MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12Month 3 (n=71,75, 69)-32.5 umStandard Deviation 114.15
Secondary

EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 12

The Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) standardized instrument was utilized to measure health outcomes related to 5 dimensions, namely: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain-discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The possible range for each dimension was 1 to 3, where 1=no problems, 2=some problems and 3=extreme problems. Missing values were not imputed. Using the scoring algorithm derived from the Canadian value sets (Bansback et al., 2012), a utility score for a patient was calculated based on the EQ-5D responses for a given time-point at which the questionnaire was presented to the patient. This mean EQ-5D utility score ranged between 0 (worst health) to 1 (perfect health).

Time frame: 12 month

Population: ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combination TherapyEuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 120.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Ranibizumab MonotherapyEuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 120.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Laser MonotherapyEuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 120.87 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.17
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS)is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months

Population: The ITT population was defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one site were excluded from ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combination TherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9Month 6 (n= 70, 72, 65)5.6 LettersStandard Deviation 8.45
Combination TherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9Month 3 (n=71, 75, 69)3.7 LettersStandard Deviation 10.71
Combination TherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9Month 9 (n=69, 71, 59)7.1 LettersStandard Deviation 7.92
Ranibizumab MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9Month 6 (n= 70, 72, 65)7.1 LettersStandard Deviation 7.74
Ranibizumab MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9Month 3 (n=71, 75, 69)5.3 LettersStandard Deviation 7.58
Ranibizumab MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9Month 9 (n=69, 71, 59)6.9 LettersStandard Deviation 12.45
Laser MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9Month 3 (n=71, 75, 69)1.4 LettersStandard Deviation 6.55
Laser MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9Month 9 (n=69, 71, 59)-0.2 LettersStandard Deviation 10.71
Laser MonotherapyMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9Month 6 (n= 70, 72, 65)0.9 LettersStandard Deviation 7.23
Secondary

National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 12

The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) was used to measure the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains. The 12 subscales in the VFQ-25 are general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision. For each question, the patient was asked to rate their condition on a scale of 1-5 or 1-6, where a low number reflects a better outcome. A composite score for a patient is calculated by aggregating and averaging the scores from the 11 sub-scales (excluding general health sub-scale), and an algorithm is apply to give equal weight to each sub-scale. Sub-scales and composite scores are calculated by converting the response from questionnaires into a 0-100 scale, with 0 as the worst possible outcome and 100 as the best. Missing data was not imputed

Time frame: 12 month

Population: ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combination TherapyNational Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 1285.21 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.77
Ranibizumab MonotherapyNational Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 1284.29 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.78
Laser MonotherapyNational Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 1278.20 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.27
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A higher percent of patients achieving a gain of ≥15 letters BCVA indicates a better response.

Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Population: The ITT population was defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one site were excluded from ITT

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Combination TherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 3 (n=71,75,69)8.5 Percentage of Patients
Combination TherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 6 (n=70,72,65)11.4 Percentage of Patients
Combination TherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 9 (69,71,59)13.0 Percentage of Patients
Combination TherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 12 (70,71,62)24.3 Percentage of Patients
Ranibizumab MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 12 (70,71,62)21.1 Percentage of Patients
Ranibizumab MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 3 (n=71,75,69)9.3 Percentage of Patients
Ranibizumab MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 9 (69,71,59)21.1 Percentage of Patients
Ranibizumab MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 6 (n=70,72,65)13.9 Percentage of Patients
Laser MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 12 (70,71,62)6.5 Percentage of Patients
Laser MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 6 (n=70,72,65)1.5 Percentage of Patients
Laser MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 9 (69,71,59)0 Percentage of Patients
Laser MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From BaselineMonth 3 (n=71,75,69)2.9 Percentage of Patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A gain of 5,10,15 or more BCVA letters from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with 12 month data were included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Combination TherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA10 letter gain34.3 Percentage of Patients
Combination TherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA5 letter gain61.4 Percentage of Patients
Combination TherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA15 letter gain24.3 Percentage of Patients
Ranibizumab MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA10 letter gain52.1 Percentage of Patients
Ranibizumab MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA5 letter gain70.4 Percentage of Patients
Ranibizumab MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA15 letter gain21.1 Percentage of Patients
Laser MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA5 letter gain40.3 Percentage of Patients
Laser MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA15 letter gain6.5 Percentage of Patients
Laser MonotherapyPercentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA10 letter gain16.1 Percentage of Patients
Secondary

Time Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 12

(TTO) questionnaire was used to help determine the patients' health utility. Reported health utility represents the patients' quality of life at the current health state, and is a cardinal value that ranges from 0 (worst possible health or death) to 1 (best possible health). In this questionnaire, patients were first asked to estimate their remaining life expectancy. Second, the patients were presented with a hypothetical situation where a technology existed that could permanently return their vision to normal. This technology would always work, but would decrease their length of survival. Patients were then asked how much of their remaining life expectancy, if any, they would be willing to trade in return for use of the technology and thus for normal vision. The principle of this measure is that if patients were content with their current vision status (i.e., have a utility value of 1.0), they would not want to trade any of their remaining life years to improve their vision.

Time frame: 12 month

Population: ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combination TherapyTime Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 120.83 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Ranibizumab MonotherapyTime Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 120.78 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
Laser MonotherapyTime Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 120.80 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026