Diabetic Macular Edema
Conditions
Keywords
DME, visual impairment, diabetes, macular edema, diabetic macular edema, ranibizumab, laser, photocoagulation, retinopathy, retina
Brief summary
To evaluate, specifically within the Canadian medical environment, the efficacy, safety and cost-efficacy of ranibizumab administered either as combination therapy (ranibizumab plus laser photocoagulation), or as monotherapy in comparison with the current standard of care (laser photocoagulation monotherapy), in patients with visual impairment due to DME.
Interventions
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg fixed loading dose via intravitreal injection, given once per month for 3 consecutive months (Day 1, Month 1 and Month 2). This treatment could be reapllied, depending on symptoms.
Laser photocoagulation treatment was administered on Day 1. Subsequent laser treatments could be administered if needed, in accordance with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) guidelines.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Stable Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus * Visual impairment due to focal or diffuse DME in at least one eye
Exclusion criteria
* Active conditions in the study eye that could prevent the improvement of visual acuity on study treatment * Active eye infection or inflammation * History of stroke, renal failure or uncontrolled hypertension Other protocol-defined inclusion/
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 12 | Baseline and 12 months | Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months | OCT is a diagnostic imaging technique using low-coherence interferometry to produce cross-sectional tomograms of the posterior segment eye structures. OCT was performed prior to study treatment to assess CRT, presence of fluid in the macula (intra-retinal cyst or fluid) and evaluation of image to monitor disease progression/treatment effect and to determine the need to stop/re-initiate ranibizumab treatment |
| Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months | Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A higher percent of patients achieving a gain of ≥15 letters BCVA indicates a better response. |
| Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA | 12 months | Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A gain of 5,10,15 or more BCVA letters from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 | Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months | Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS)is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement. |
| EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 12 | 12 month | The Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) standardized instrument was utilized to measure health outcomes related to 5 dimensions, namely: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain-discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The possible range for each dimension was 1 to 3, where 1=no problems, 2=some problems and 3=extreme problems. Missing values were not imputed. Using the scoring algorithm derived from the Canadian value sets (Bansback et al., 2012), a utility score for a patient was calculated based on the EQ-5D responses for a given time-point at which the questionnaire was presented to the patient. This mean EQ-5D utility score ranged between 0 (worst health) to 1 (perfect health). |
| Time Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 12 | 12 month | (TTO) questionnaire was used to help determine the patients' health utility. Reported health utility represents the patients' quality of life at the current health state, and is a cardinal value that ranges from 0 (worst possible health or death) to 1 (best possible health). In this questionnaire, patients were first asked to estimate their remaining life expectancy. Second, the patients were presented with a hypothetical situation where a technology existed that could permanently return their vision to normal. This technology would always work, but would decrease their length of survival. Patients were then asked how much of their remaining life expectancy, if any, they would be willing to trade in return for use of the technology and thus for normal vision. The principle of this measure is that if patients were content with their current vision status (i.e., have a utility value of 1.0), they would not want to trade any of their remaining life years to improve their vision. |
| National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 12 | 12 month | The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) was used to measure the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains. The 12 subscales in the VFQ-25 are general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision. For each question, the patient was asked to rate their condition on a scale of 1-5 or 1-6, where a low number reflects a better outcome. A composite score for a patient is calculated by aggregating and averaging the scores from the 11 sub-scales (excluding general health sub-scale), and an algorithm is apply to give equal weight to each sub-scale. Sub-scales and composite scores are calculated by converting the response from questionnaires into a 0-100 scale, with 0 as the worst possible outcome and 100 as the best. Missing data was not imputed |
Countries
Canada
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 239 patients were enrolled in the study. An additional 2 patients were enrolled but were removed from the database because consent was not signed in accordance with GCP principles.
Pre-assignment details
3 treatment arms: Group C - laser photocoagulation per ETDRS guidelines, Group B - ranibizumab intravitreal injections (3 monthly injections during loading phase, and subsequent treatments per protocol-defined criteria), or Group A - combination therapy, where decisions to treat with laser were independent of decisions to treat with ranibizumab.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Combination Therapy Participants received both a ranibizumab intravitreal injection and laser photocoagulation treatments. | 73 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy Participants received ranibizumab intravitreal injection therapy only | 75 |
| Laser Monotherapy Participants received Laser photocoagulation therapy only | 72 |
| Total | 220 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 3 | 6 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Combination Therapy | Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Laser Monotherapy | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 60.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.21 | 61.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86 | 62.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.44 | 61.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.83 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 26 Participants | 33 Participants | 29 Participants | 88 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 47 Participants | 42 Participants | 43 Participants | 132 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 26 / 73 | 26 / 75 | 17 / 74 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 9 / 73 | 10 / 75 | 5 / 74 |
Outcome results
Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 12
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Population: ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 12 | 8.2 Letters | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 12 | 8.9 Letters | Standard Deviation 7.78 |
| Laser Monotherapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity- (BCVA) at Month 12 | 0.3 Letters | Standard Deviation 12.47 |
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12
OCT is a diagnostic imaging technique using low-coherence interferometry to produce cross-sectional tomograms of the posterior segment eye structures. OCT was performed prior to study treatment to assess CRT, presence of fluid in the macula (intra-retinal cyst or fluid) and evaluation of image to monitor disease progression/treatment effect and to determine the need to stop/re-initiate ranibizumab treatment
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Population: The ITT population was defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one site were excluded from ITT.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 9 (69,70,58) | -138.1 um | Standard Deviation 125.86 |
| Combination Therapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 6 (n= 70,72,65) | -114.2 um | Standard Deviation 110.88 |
| Combination Therapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Baseline | 422.1 um | Standard Deviation 142.26 |
| Combination Therapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 3 (n=71,75, 69) | -105.7 um | Standard Deviation 127.74 |
| Combination Therapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 12 (70,71,61) | -152.2 um | Standard Deviation 139.27 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 6 (n= 70,72,65) | -129.3 um | Standard Deviation 116.5 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Baseline | 448.5 um | Standard Deviation 136.64 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 3 (n=71,75, 69) | -108.9 um | Standard Deviation 113.38 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 9 (69,70,58) | -135.9 um | Standard Deviation 140.9 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 12 (70,71,61) | -143.5 um | Standard Deviation 143.95 |
| Laser Monotherapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 12 (70,71,61) | -107.1 um | Standard Deviation 143.86 |
| Laser Monotherapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 9 (69,70,58) | -85.8 um | Standard Deviation 128 |
| Laser Monotherapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Baseline | 458.0 um | Standard Deviation 133.07 |
| Laser Monotherapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 6 (n= 70,72,65) | -64.4 um | Standard Deviation 110.77 |
| Laser Monotherapy | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Months 3,6,9 and 12 | Month 3 (n=71,75, 69) | -32.5 um | Standard Deviation 114.15 |
EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 12
The Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) standardized instrument was utilized to measure health outcomes related to 5 dimensions, namely: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain-discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The possible range for each dimension was 1 to 3, where 1=no problems, 2=some problems and 3=extreme problems. Missing values were not imputed. Using the scoring algorithm derived from the Canadian value sets (Bansback et al., 2012), a utility score for a patient was calculated based on the EQ-5D responses for a given time-point at which the questionnaire was presented to the patient. This mean EQ-5D utility score ranged between 0 (worst health) to 1 (perfect health).
Time frame: 12 month
Population: ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 12 | 0.88 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.15 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 12 | 0.88 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| Laser Monotherapy | EuroQoL (EQ-5D) Utility Score at Month 12 | 0.87 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS)is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months
Population: The ITT population was defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one site were excluded from ITT.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 | Month 6 (n= 70, 72, 65) | 5.6 Letters | Standard Deviation 8.45 |
| Combination Therapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 | Month 3 (n=71, 75, 69) | 3.7 Letters | Standard Deviation 10.71 |
| Combination Therapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 | Month 9 (n=69, 71, 59) | 7.1 Letters | Standard Deviation 7.92 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 | Month 6 (n= 70, 72, 65) | 7.1 Letters | Standard Deviation 7.74 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 | Month 3 (n=71, 75, 69) | 5.3 Letters | Standard Deviation 7.58 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 | Month 9 (n=69, 71, 59) | 6.9 Letters | Standard Deviation 12.45 |
| Laser Monotherapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 | Month 3 (n=71, 75, 69) | 1.4 Letters | Standard Deviation 6.55 |
| Laser Monotherapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 | Month 9 (n=69, 71, 59) | -0.2 Letters | Standard Deviation 10.71 |
| Laser Monotherapy | Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Months 3,6 and 9 | Month 6 (n= 70, 72, 65) | 0.9 Letters | Standard Deviation 7.23 |
National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 12
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) was used to measure the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains. The 12 subscales in the VFQ-25 are general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision. For each question, the patient was asked to rate their condition on a scale of 1-5 or 1-6, where a low number reflects a better outcome. A composite score for a patient is calculated by aggregating and averaging the scores from the 11 sub-scales (excluding general health sub-scale), and an algorithm is apply to give equal weight to each sub-scale. Sub-scales and composite scores are calculated by converting the response from questionnaires into a 0-100 scale, with 0 as the worst possible outcome and 100 as the best. Missing data was not imputed
Time frame: 12 month
Population: ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 12 | 85.21 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 12.77 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 12 | 84.29 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 11.78 |
| Laser Monotherapy | National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Composite Score at Month 12 | 78.20 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 17.27 |
Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A higher percent of patients achieving a gain of ≥15 letters BCVA indicates a better response.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Population: The ITT population was defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one site were excluded from ITT
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 3 (n=71,75,69) | 8.5 Percentage of Patients |
| Combination Therapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 6 (n=70,72,65) | 11.4 Percentage of Patients |
| Combination Therapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 9 (69,71,59) | 13.0 Percentage of Patients |
| Combination Therapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 12 (70,71,62) | 24.3 Percentage of Patients |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 12 (70,71,62) | 21.1 Percentage of Patients |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 3 (n=71,75,69) | 9.3 Percentage of Patients |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 9 (69,71,59) | 21.1 Percentage of Patients |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 6 (n=70,72,65) | 13.9 Percentage of Patients |
| Laser Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 12 (70,71,62) | 6.5 Percentage of Patients |
| Laser Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 6 (n=70,72,65) | 1.5 Percentage of Patients |
| Laser Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 9 (69,71,59) | 0 Percentage of Patients |
| Laser Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving a Gain of 15-letters or More (3-lines) in BCVA From Baseline | Month 3 (n=71,75,69) | 2.9 Percentage of Patients |
Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of BCVA (EDTRS) is 0 to 100 letters. A gain of 5,10,15 or more BCVA letters from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with 12 month data were included
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA | 10 letter gain | 34.3 Percentage of Patients |
| Combination Therapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA | 5 letter gain | 61.4 Percentage of Patients |
| Combination Therapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA | 15 letter gain | 24.3 Percentage of Patients |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA | 10 letter gain | 52.1 Percentage of Patients |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA | 5 letter gain | 70.4 Percentage of Patients |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA | 15 letter gain | 21.1 Percentage of Patients |
| Laser Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA | 5 letter gain | 40.3 Percentage of Patients |
| Laser Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA | 15 letter gain | 6.5 Percentage of Patients |
| Laser Monotherapy | Percentage of Patients Achieving Gain of Letters From Baseline in BCVA | 10 letter gain | 16.1 Percentage of Patients |
Time Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 12
(TTO) questionnaire was used to help determine the patients' health utility. Reported health utility represents the patients' quality of life at the current health state, and is a cardinal value that ranges from 0 (worst possible health or death) to 1 (best possible health). In this questionnaire, patients were first asked to estimate their remaining life expectancy. Second, the patients were presented with a hypothetical situation where a technology existed that could permanently return their vision to normal. This technology would always work, but would decrease their length of survival. Patients were then asked how much of their remaining life expectancy, if any, they would be willing to trade in return for use of the technology and thus for normal vision. The principle of this measure is that if patients were content with their current vision status (i.e., have a utility value of 1.0), they would not want to trade any of their remaining life years to improve their vision.
Time frame: 12 month
Population: ITT defined as all patients receiving at least one dose of either study treatment for monotherapy treatment arms, or one of the two study treatments for the combination therapy arm, and having at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Patients from one study site were excluded from ITT. Patients with both baseline and 12 month data were included
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination Therapy | Time Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 12 | 0.83 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Ranibizumab Monotherapy | Time Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 12 | 0.78 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| Laser Monotherapy | Time Trade-Off Questionnaire - 25 (TTO) Composite Score at Month 12 | 0.80 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24 |