Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CEP-33457 in Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a 200-mcg Dose of CEP-33457 in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01135459
Enrollment
183
Registered
2010-06-02
Start date
2010-06-24
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2022-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Keywords

Lupus

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a 200 micrograms (mcg) dose of CEP-33457 compared with placebo in participants with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as assessed by the proportion of participants achieving a combined clinical response using the SLE responder index (SRI) at Week 24.

Detailed description

The study consisted of a 2-week screening period (visit 1), a 20-week treatment period beginning with a baseline visit in which randomization was completed and study drug treatment began (visits 2 through 7), and a final assessment was performed 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug (visit 8 \[week 24 or early termination\]). Participants were randomized to receive either CEP-33457 or placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks. Plasma samples for measurement of study drug concentration were collected in a subset of participants and study drug was administered at each study visit until the final visit. The dose of background steroid medication may have been increased, if needed, to treat the participant for minor fluctuations in lupus disease activity. One interim analysis was conducted when at least 80 participants completed Week 12 or had been withdrawn from the study. Participants who completed the treatment period returned to the study center 4 weeks after the last dose had been administered for final procedures and assessments. Final procedures and assessments for participants who withdrew from the study before 20 weeks of treatment were performed at the last visit. Final procedures and assessments for participants who participated in the study beyond week 24 were to be performed at the next regularly scheduled visit. Participants who complete the study will be eligible for participation in the 12-month open-label study (study C33457/3075; herein referred to as study 3075) to assess continued effectiveness and safety of the CEP-33457 treatment.

Interventions

CEP-33457 will be administered per dose and schedule specified in the arm description.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo matching to CEP-33457 will be administered per schedule specified in the arm description.

Sponsors

Cephalon, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The participant has an established diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as defined by ACR Classification Revised Criteria. The diagnosis is fulfilled provided that at least 4 criteria are met. * The participant has a positive test for antinuclear antibody (ANA) at screening and/or a positive test for anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid antibody (anti-dsDNA Ab) at screening. * Women must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or, if of childbearing potential, using a medically accepted method of contraception, and must agree to continued use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after discontinuation of study drug treatment. * The participant has a clinical SLEDAI-2K score of at least 6 points during screening. * The participant does not have an A score on the BILAG-2004 scale. * If the patient is using oral corticosteroids, the weekly cumulative dose must not exceed 80 mg of prednisone equivalent; the weekly dose must be stable over the 4 weeks preceding the first dose of study drug. * If the participant is using antimalarials, methotrexate, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine, the start date must be at least 3 months prior to the first dose of study drug, and the daily dose must be stable over the 4 weeks preceding the first dose of study drug. * If the participant is not currently using corticosteroids, antimalarials, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine, the last dose (in case of previous use) must be at least 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug. For leflunomide, the stop date must be at least 8 weeks before the first dose of study drug, unless an adequate cholestyramine washout has been completed.

Exclusion criteria

* The participant has been treated with intramuscular or intravenous (iv) pulse steroids (ie, 250 to 1000 milligrams \[mg\] iv total daily dose of methylprednisolone) within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug. The use of intra-articular steroids may be allowed after consultation with the medical expert. * The participant has received tacrolimus, cyclosporine A, or iv immunoglobulins (IVIG) within 3 months of the first dose of study drug. * The participant has received cyclophosphamide within 12 months prior to the first dose of study drug. * The participant has been treated for SLE with agents such as fusion proteins, therapeutic proteins, or monoclonal antibodies or antibody fragments, within 12 months of the first dose of study drug. * The participant has received B-cell depleting agents such as rituximab and has not yet normalized the B-cell count (ie, CD20+ B-cell count is less than 200 and the absolute lymphocyte count \[ALC\] is less than 1500/μL). * The participant has New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV congestive heart failure. * The participant has severe active lupus nephritis or cerebritis. * The participant has an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 30 milliliters (mL)/minute (min)/1.73 square meter (m\^2) (via Modification of Diet in Renal Disease \[MDRD\] equation). * The participant has an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) value greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or a total bilirubin level greater than 1.5 times ULN. * The participant has a planned immunization with a live or live attenuated vaccine within 3 months prior to administration of the first dose of study drug and for 3 months after administration of the last dose of study drug. * The participant has any clinically significant abnormalities on electrocardiogram (ECG) that are not related to SLE, as determined by the investigator. Participant with stable ECG changes without evidence of active cardiovascular disease may participate at the discretion of the investigator and medical monitor. * The participant has an ongoing active systemic infection requiring treatment or a history of severe infection, such as hepatitis or pneumonia, in the 3 months prior to administration of the first dose of study drug. Less severe infections in the 3 months prior to administration of the first dose of study drug are permitted at the discretion of the investigator and medical monitor. * The participant has any concomitant medical condition unrelated to SLE that may interfere with his or her safety or with evaluation of the study drug, as determined by the investigator. * The participant has a history of a medical condition other than SLE that has required treatment with steroids in excess of 80 mg of prednisone equivalent/week within 6 months of the first dose of study drug. * The participant has a positive test result for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or antibodies to hepatitis C (HCV Ab). * The participant has a known positive history of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or HIV disease. * The participant has a history of alcohol or substance dependence or abuse (with the exception of nicotine), according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the American Psychiatric Association, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), within 3 months of the screening visit or has current substance abuse. * The participant has a history of severe allergic reactions to or hypersensitivity to any component of the study drug or placebo. * The participant has undergone or is undergoing treatment with another investigational drug for the treatment of lupus within 6 months prior to the 1st dose of study drug or has received any other investigational drug for any other condition within 30 days prior to the 1st dose of study drug. * The participant has previously participated in a Cephalon- or ImmuPharma-sponsored clinical study with CEP-33457. * The participant is a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any women becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study.) * The participant is unlikely to comply with the study protocol or is unsuitable for any other reason, as judged by the investigator or medical monitor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Achieving a Combined Clinical Response Using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) at Week 24Week 24An SRI response was defined as a reduction from baseline in SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score of ≥4 points, no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (PhGA), no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A body system score, and ≤1 new BILAG B body system score from baseline. SLEDAI-2K includes 24 weighted clinical and laboratory variables. Total score = 0 to 105. A score of 6 to 10 = moderate disease activity, and a reduction of \>3 points = improvement. PhGA was completed by physician using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0=none to 3=severe. A change of \>0.3 points = worsening. BILAG includes 97 clinical and laboratory items. Each organ system is assigned a score displayed as a grade from A to E: A=very active disease; B=patient needs increase in treatment for moderately active disease; C=stable or mild disease; D=previous organ involvement but no current disease activity; and E=no current disease activity and organ system has never been involved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Achieving a Reduction of at Least 4 Points in the SLEDAI-2K Total ScoreWeek 24The SLEDAI-2K is a global index and includes 24 weighted clinical and laboratory variables. The total score (sum of all 24 scores) ranges from 0 to 105. A SLEDAI-2K score of 6 to 10 is indicative of moderate disease activity, and improvement is defined as a reduction of more than 3 points.
Number of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The BILAG 2004 is a validated objective and subjective global measure of the disease activity of SLE based on the physician intention to treat. It includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems; each organ system is assigned a score displayed as a grade from A to E, as follows: A=very active disease; B=participant needs increase in treatment for moderately active disease; C=stable or mild disease; D=previous organ involvement but no current disease activity; and E=no current disease activity and the organ system has never been involved. BILAG 2004 response was defined as no new A body system score and no more than 1 new BILAG B body system score from baseline.
Number of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The BILAG 2004 is a validated objective and subjective global measure of the disease activity of SLE based on the physician intention to treat. It includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems; each organ system is assigned a score displayed as a grade from A to E, as follows: A=very active disease; B=participant needs increase in treatment for moderately active disease; C=stable or mild disease; D=previous organ involvement but no current disease activity; and E=no current disease activity and the organ system has never been involved. BILAG 2004 clinical response was defined as having an improvement in at least 1 category from a B score at baseline to a C or D score with no worsening in any other category from baseline.
Number of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The PhGA was completed by the physician using a 3 inch VAS labeled from 0=none to 3=severe. The PhGA response was defined as having no worsening in PhGA (with worsening defined as an increase in PhGA of more than 0.30 inch from baseline).
Number of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment PeriodWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20An SRI response was defined as a reduction from baseline in SLEDAI-2K score of ≥4 points, no worsening in PhGA, no new BILAG A body system score, and ≤1 new BILAG B body system score from baseline. SLEDAI-2K includes 24 weighted clinical and laboratory variables. Total score = 0 to 105. A score of 6 to 10 = moderate disease activity, and a reduction of \>3 points = improvement. PhGA was completed by physician using a VAS from 0=none to 3=severe. A change of \>0.3 points = worsening. BILAG includes 97 clinical and laboratory items. Each organ system is assigned a score displayed as a grade from A to E: A=very active disease; B=participant needs increase in treatment for moderately active disease; C=stable or mild disease; D=previous organ involvement but no current disease activity; and E=no current disease activity and organ system has never been involved.
Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Week 12, Week 24The SF-36 questionnaire has 36 questions composing the scale that represent 8 domains: 1) physical functioning, role physical, 2) bodily pain, 3) general health, 4) vitality, 5) social functioning, 6) role, 7) emotional, and 8) mental health. The scores for the 8 domains were combined into two summary scores: the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Items 1 to 4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores represent better health status and functional ability.
Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey SF-36 Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Week 12, Week 24The SF-36 questionnaire has 36 questions composing the scale that represent 8 domains: 1) physical functioning, role physical, 2) bodily pain, 3) general health, 4) vitality, 5) social functioning, 6) role, 7) emotional, and 8) mental health. The scores for the 8 domains were combined into two summary scores: the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Items 1 to 4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores represent better health status and functional ability.
Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage IndexBaseline, Week 24SLICC/ACR score or damage index is a measure of cumulative damage due to SLE. Damage is defined as nonreversible change (not related to active inflammation) occurring since onset of lupus, ascertained by clinical assessment and present for at least 6 months. Damage is defined for 12 separate organ systems: ocular (range 0-2), neuropsychiatric (0-6), renal (0-3), pulmonary (0-5), cardiovascular (0-6), peripheral vascular (0-5), gastrointestinal (0-6), musculoskeletal (0-7), skin (0-3), endocrine (diabetes) (0-1), gonadal (0-1) and malignancies (0-2). A score of 0=no damage, early damage is defined as ≥1. The total maximum score is 47, and increasing score indicates increasing disease damage severity.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline up to Week 24An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAEs were defined as death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Number of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The PhGA was completed by the participant using a 3 inch VAS labeled from 0=none to 3=severe. The PtGA response was defined as having no worsening in PtGA (with worsening defined as an increase in PtGA of more than 0.30 inch from baseline).

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to CEP-33457 SC every 4 weeks for 20 weeks (Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20).
92
CEP-33457
Participants received CEP-33457 200 mcg SC every 4 weeks for 20 weeks (Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20).
91
Total183

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event810
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy31
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyNon-compliance to study procedures01
Overall StudyOther than specified11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation53
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboCEP-33457Total
Age, Continuous40.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.88
42.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.25
41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.58
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants11 Participants21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
82 Participants80 Participants162 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaskan Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black
17 Participants18 Participants35 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
8 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
64 Participants67 Participants131 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
83 Participants86 Participants169 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants5 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 920 / 91
other
Total, other adverse events
58 / 9261 / 91
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 929 / 91

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Achieving a Combined Clinical Response Using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) at Week 24

An SRI response was defined as a reduction from baseline in SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score of ≥4 points, no worsening in Physician Global Assessment (PhGA), no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A body system score, and ≤1 new BILAG B body system score from baseline. SLEDAI-2K includes 24 weighted clinical and laboratory variables. Total score = 0 to 105. A score of 6 to 10 = moderate disease activity, and a reduction of \>3 points = improvement. PhGA was completed by physician using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0=none to 3=severe. A change of \>0.3 points = worsening. BILAG includes 97 clinical and laboratory items. Each organ system is assigned a score displayed as a grade from A to E: A=very active disease; B=patient needs increase in treatment for moderately active disease; C=stable or mild disease; D=previous organ involvement but no current disease activity; and E=no current disease activity and organ system has never been involved.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had the baseline SLEDAI-2K total score, BILAG 2004 body system scores, and the PhGA score.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Combined Clinical Response Using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) at Week 2437 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Combined Clinical Response Using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index (SRI) at Week 2431 Participants
Comparison: Analysis was performed using a logistic regression model with treatment and stratification factors as main factors.p-value: 0.398995% CI: [0.4, 1.4]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey SF-36 Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24

The SF-36 questionnaire has 36 questions composing the scale that represent 8 domains: 1) physical functioning, role physical, 2) bodily pain, 3) general health, 4) vitality, 5) social functioning, 6) role, 7) emotional, and 8) mental health. The scores for the 8 domains were combined into two summary scores: the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Items 1 to 4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores represent better health status and functional ability.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had the baseline SLEDAI-2K total score, BILAG 2004 body system scores, and the PhGA score. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey SF-36 Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline40.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey SF-36 Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Change at Week 120.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey SF-36 Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Change at Week 240.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.45
CEP-33457Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey SF-36 Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline41.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.26
CEP-33457Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey SF-36 Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Change at Week 121.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.66
CEP-33457Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey SF-36 Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Change at Week 241.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24

The SF-36 questionnaire has 36 questions composing the scale that represent 8 domains: 1) physical functioning, role physical, 2) bodily pain, 3) general health, 4) vitality, 5) social functioning, 6) role, 7) emotional, and 8) mental health. The scores for the 8 domains were combined into two summary scores: the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Items 1 to 4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. Scores on each item were summed and averaged (range: 0=worst to 100=best). Higher scores represent better health status and functional ability.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had the baseline SLEDAI-2K total score, BILAG 2004 body system scores, and the PhGA score. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline37.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Change at Week 122.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Change at Week 242.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.66
CEP-33457Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline36.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.06
CEP-33457Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Change at Week 122.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
CEP-33457Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Patient-Reported Questionnaire For Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Weeks 12 and 24Change at Week 242.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.36
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical Response

The BILAG 2004 is a validated objective and subjective global measure of the disease activity of SLE based on the physician intention to treat. It includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems; each organ system is assigned a score displayed as a grade from A to E, as follows: A=very active disease; B=participant needs increase in treatment for moderately active disease; C=stable or mild disease; D=previous organ involvement but no current disease activity; and E=no current disease activity and the organ system has never been involved. BILAG 2004 clinical response was defined as having an improvement in at least 1 category from a B score at baseline to a C or D score with no worsening in any other category from baseline.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had the baseline SLEDAI-2K total score, BILAG 2004 body system scores, and the PhGA score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 432 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 834 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 1245 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 1642 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 2043 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 2439 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 2032 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 436 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 1633 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 837 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 2431 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a BILAG 2004 Clinical ResponseWeek 1234 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 Response

The BILAG 2004 is a validated objective and subjective global measure of the disease activity of SLE based on the physician intention to treat. It includes 97 clinical and laboratory items to evaluate SLE disease activity in 9 organ systems; each organ system is assigned a score displayed as a grade from A to E, as follows: A=very active disease; B=participant needs increase in treatment for moderately active disease; C=stable or mild disease; D=previous organ involvement but no current disease activity; and E=no current disease activity and the organ system has never been involved. BILAG 2004 response was defined as no new A body system score and no more than 1 new BILAG B body system score from baseline.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had the baseline SLEDAI-2K total score, BILAG 2004 body system scores, and the PhGA score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 486 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 882 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 1280 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 1676 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 2074 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 2470 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 2066 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 482 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 1666 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 879 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 2463 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) 2004 ResponseWeek 1275 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment Period

An SRI response was defined as a reduction from baseline in SLEDAI-2K score of ≥4 points, no worsening in PhGA, no new BILAG A body system score, and ≤1 new BILAG B body system score from baseline. SLEDAI-2K includes 24 weighted clinical and laboratory variables. Total score = 0 to 105. A score of 6 to 10 = moderate disease activity, and a reduction of \>3 points = improvement. PhGA was completed by physician using a VAS from 0=none to 3=severe. A change of \>0.3 points = worsening. BILAG includes 97 clinical and laboratory items. Each organ system is assigned a score displayed as a grade from A to E: A=very active disease; B=participant needs increase in treatment for moderately active disease; C=stable or mild disease; D=previous organ involvement but no current disease activity; and E=no current disease activity and organ system has never been involved.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had the baseline SLEDAI-2K total score, BILAG 2004 body system scores, and the PhGA score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment PeriodWeek 819 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment PeriodWeek 1629 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment PeriodWeek 411 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment PeriodWeek 2038 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment PeriodWeek 1233 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment PeriodWeek 2030 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment PeriodWeek 827 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment PeriodWeek 1229 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment PeriodWeek 1628 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving an SRI Response at Each Visit During the Treatment PeriodWeek 413 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) Response

The PhGA was completed by the participant using a 3 inch VAS labeled from 0=none to 3=severe. The PtGA response was defined as having no worsening in PtGA (with worsening defined as an increase in PtGA of more than 0.30 inch from baseline).

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had the baseline SLEDAI-2K total score, BILAG 2004 body system scores, and the PhGA score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 873 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 1665 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 479 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 2065 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 1264 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 2463 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 1263 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 465 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 867 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 2459 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 1657 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) ResponseWeek 2059 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) Response

The PhGA was completed by the physician using a 3 inch VAS labeled from 0=none to 3=severe. The PhGA response was defined as having no worsening in PhGA (with worsening defined as an increase in PhGA of more than 0.30 inch from baseline).

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had the baseline SLEDAI-2K total score, BILAG 2004 body system scores, and the PhGA score.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 480 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 883 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 1277 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 1671 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 2073 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 2471 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 2064 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 476 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 1661 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 875 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 2467 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) ResponseWeek 1268 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving a Reduction of at Least 4 Points in the SLEDAI-2K Total Score

The SLEDAI-2K is a global index and includes 24 weighted clinical and laboratory variables. The total score (sum of all 24 scores) ranges from 0 to 105. A SLEDAI-2K score of 6 to 10 is indicative of moderate disease activity, and improvement is defined as a reduction of more than 3 points.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had the baseline SLEDAI-2K total score, BILAG 2004 body system scores, and the PhGA score.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Achieving a Reduction of at Least 4 Points in the SLEDAI-2K Total Score40 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants Achieving a Reduction of at Least 4 Points in the SLEDAI-2K Total Score32 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAEs were defined as death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)81 Participants
CEP-33457Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)77 Participants
Secondary

Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage Index

SLICC/ACR score or damage index is a measure of cumulative damage due to SLE. Damage is defined as nonreversible change (not related to active inflammation) occurring since onset of lupus, ascertained by clinical assessment and present for at least 6 months. Damage is defined for 12 separate organ systems: ocular (range 0-2), neuropsychiatric (0-6), renal (0-3), pulmonary (0-5), cardiovascular (0-6), peripheral vascular (0-5), gastrointestinal (0-6), musculoskeletal (0-7), skin (0-3), endocrine (diabetes) (0-1), gonadal (0-1) and malignancies (0-2). A score of 0=no damage, early damage is defined as ≥1. The total maximum score is 47, and increasing score indicates increasing disease damage severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: Full analysis set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had the baseline SLEDAI-2K total score, BILAG 2004 body system scores, and the PhGA score. Number analyzed = participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSystemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage IndexBaseline0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboSystemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage IndexChange at Week 24-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
CEP-33457Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage IndexBaseline0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
CEP-33457Systemic Lupus International Collaborative Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC/ACR) Damage IndexChange at Week 24-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026