Visual Attention in Parkinson's Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, Deep brain stimulation, Subthalamic nucleus, Levodopa, Selective visual attention, Basal ganglia diseases
Brief summary
Parkinson's disease (PD), which is generally considered to be a motor disorder, is now known to be accompanied in many instances by a variety of cognitive defects. This can be explained considering that PD is a neurodegenerative and progressive disorder of the basal ganglia system, which works modulating not only motor, but also cognitive and emotional behaviours. Concerning this, some studies suggest that non-demented PD patients may suffer from a voluntary selective visual attention orienting deficit, showing a reduced skill in focusing upon one target, and may be easily distracted from irrelevant but salient stimuli, with a consequent negative impact on their physical health, social interactions and quality of life. Up to now, the evidence of the role of the basal-ganglia system in modulating visual attention functions is poor and indirect and the effects of dopaminergic and subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation (two usual and effective treatments in PD) on attention performances are controversial. The main objectives of the project are: 1) to assess the visual selective attention as well as the distractibility in PD patients; 2) to study the effects of patient's usual antiparkinsonian treatments, that is dopaminergic and STN stimulation, on visual attention performances. Secondly, from a clinical and neurophysiologic point of view, the investigators want to study the respective role of the dopaminergic pathways and the sensorimotor and associative/limbic cortico-basal ganglia loops passing across the STN in the visual attention performances. To precisely answer the objectives of the protocol, the investigators will record the performances of participants during the administration of 3 computerized tests, which are suitable to study visual attention, decision making and motor performances. The investigators will compare the performances on the computerized tests of two groups of PD patients, one evaluated in different sets of electrical (without stimulation, or selective stimulation of the sensorimotor or associative/limbic part of the STN) stimulation, the other in different conditions of medication (with or without dopaminergic treatment) with those of a group of healthy subjects.
Detailed description
Study Model: parallel-groups study. Three groups of subjects will be enrolled for the study: 2 groups of PD patients (see for details the section groups/cohorts), and a group of healthy controls.
Interventions
OTHERRecording during computerized tests
Patients will perform more than one experimental session. In each experimental session 3 computerized tasks, which are suitable to study visual attention, decision making and motor performances will be presented. During these tests, participants have to responds the most quickly and accurately possible to the appearance on a computer display of a predetermined target stimuli, presented alone or in an array of signals. The computerized tests are administered in two different conditions of medication: with or without dopaminergic treatment, corresponding to two different experimental sessions.
Sponsors
University Hospital, Grenoble
Study design
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
PD patients and healthy controls will be matched for age, sex, and education. PD patients: group #1 e group #2 Inclusion Criteria: * Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease at a disease's stage characterized by motor complications * Able to tolerate a prolonged condition without medication * Levodopa response \> 30% (for group #1) * Self-declared normal or corrected to normal vision * At least one contact lead in the sensorimotor part and another contact in the associativelimbic part of the STN (for group #2). * Patients with a healthy social security affiliation * Able to give and sign the informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Patients under guardianship, interdicted, or under administrative measures and legal constraints * Fertile women not using adequate contraceptive methods * Women who are pregnant or breast feeding * Severe cognitive impairment * Severe frontal executive functions impairment * Actual psychotic disorders * Major depression * Motivation impairment * Any medical or psychological problems which may interfere with a smooth conduction of the study protocol * Significant deficiency in red-green color discrimination * Drug or alcohol addiction Healthy controls: group #3 Inclusion Criteria: * Self-declared neurologically healthy subjects, * Self-declared normal or corrected to normal vision * No psychotropic or neurotrophic drugs intake * Subjects with a healthy social security affiliation * Able to give and sign the informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| reaction time in trials of the computerized tests | 1 hour for each experimental session. All participants will perform more than one experimental session, on different days within the same week | Reaction times is recorded during one hour sessions for each patient/control subject (for more details see the Intervention Section) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| responses accuracy in trials of the computerized tests | 1 hour for each experimental session. All participants will perform more than one experimental session, on different days within the same week | responses accuracy is recorded during one hour sessions for each patient/control subject (for more details see the Intervention Section) |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed