Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Lansoprazole in Patients With Reflux Disease

Safety and Efficacy of Lansoprazole in Patients With Reflux Disease. An Open, Single Arm, Long-term Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01135368
Enrollment
506
Registered
2010-06-02
Start date
2002-06-30
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2012-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux

Keywords

GERD, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Drug Therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to measure the safety, efficacy and quality of life of lansoprazole in patients with reflux disease over a five year period.

Detailed description

Lansoprazole is currently approved in Germany for the treatment of erosive reflux esophagitis and active duodenal and gastric ulcer disease, and for long-term treatment including maintenance of healed reflux esophagitis and duodenal ulcer disease and treatment of pathological hypersecretory conditions such as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. This study was conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy and quality of life of patients receiving up to five years of treatment with lansoprazole.

Interventions

DRUGLansoprazole

Lansoprazole capsules

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Had Gastro Esophageal Reflux disease with or without oesophagitis. * Had a history of heartburn at least for 5 days per week during the past 6 months or was receiving long-term treatment with a proton pump inhibitor and during two weeks (without proton pump inhibitor treatment) prior to enrolment.

Exclusion criteria

* History of surgery of stomach or oesophagus. * Gastric ulcer (can be included after healing of gastric ulcer). * Duodenal ulcer (can be included after healing of duodenal ulcer). * Bleeding (melena, hematemesis). * Severe concomitant disease (cancer, cardiovascular, renal, hepatic diseases). * Barrett oesophagus with dysplasia. * Complicated esophagitis (oesophageal strictures or ulcers). * Treatment with proton pump inhibitor or Histamine receptor 2 (H2)antagonists within the previous two weeks. * Pregnancy, wish to become pregnant, breast feeding. * Treatment with non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, treatment with acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) \> 100 mg/day.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnBaseline and Week 8Heartburn symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationBaseline and Week 8Acid regurgitation symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingBaseline and Week 8Difficulty swallowing symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenBaseline and Week 8Pain in the upper abdomen symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingBaseline and Week 8Nausea and vomiting symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatBaseline and Week 8Cough and sore throat symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyBaseline and Week 8Los Angeles Classification is used to grade the extension of changes in the oesophagus induced by reflux disease (Grade 0: normal aspect of mucosa; Grade A: ≥1 mucosal breaks no longer than 5 mm; Grade B: ≥1 mucosal breaks \>5 mm long; Grade C: mucosal breaks extending between tops of two or more mucosal folds but are \<75% of the circumference; Grade D: mucosal breaks ≥75% of the circumference). Healed defined as anything less than Grade A criteria. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in Los Angeles classification between Baseline (table columns) and Week 8 (table rows).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaBaseline and Year 5Intestinal metaplasia was assessed by biopsy and histopathological examination of the corpus and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in intestinal metaplasia classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - TestosteroneBaseline and Year 5The change between testosterone measured at year 5 in males including final visit and Testosterone measured at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Follicle Stimulating HormoneBaseline and Year 5.The change between follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) measured at year 5 in males including final visit and follicle stimulating hormone measured at baseline.
Ophthalmologic Examination - Visual AcuityBaseline and Year 5Visual Acuity was measured using the Snellen eye chart at a distance of 6 meters. Acuity is expressed as a ratio of the test distance (6 M) / the distance the average eye can see the letters on a certain line of the eye chart. Visual acuity of 1 is normal; an individual with acuity of 0.5 could only recognize an object at half the distance compared to an individual with normal acuity.
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareBaseline and Year 5Adaptation is the ability of the eye to adjust to various levels of darkness and light. Normal and pathological status of adaptation without glare was defined as follows: * Normal status: Contrast between 1:0.05 and 1:23.5. * Pathological status: Contrast = 0 or contrast \> 1:23.5. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in the classification of adaptation without glare between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareBaseline and Year 5Adaptation is the ability of the eye to adjust to various levels of darkness and light. Normal and pathological status of adaptation with glare was defined as follows: * Normal status: Contrast between 1:0.05 and 1:23.5. * Pathological status: Contrast = 0 or contrast \> 1:23.5. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in the classification of adaptation with glare between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - AccommodationBaseline and Year 5Accommodation is the adjustment of the focal length of the eye lens to keep an object in focus on the retina as its distance from the eye varies, and is measured in diopters: Diopters = 1/(focal length).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color VisionBaseline and Year 5Color vision was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and classified as normal or pathological. Pathological findings include abnormal color vision tests, color blindness and anomalous quotient. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in color vision classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right EyeBaseline and Year 5The cornea of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, corneal degeneration, opacity, scars or deposits. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in corneal classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left EyeBaseline and Year 5The cornea of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, corneal degeneration, opacity, scars or deposits. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in corneal classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right EyeBaseline and Year 5The lens of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, lenticular opacities, vacuoles or pseudophakia. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in lens classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Luteinizing HormoneBaseline and Year 5The change between luteinizing hormone measured at year 5 in males including final visit and luteinizing hormone measured at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right EyeBaseline and Year 5The vitreous body of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as myodesopsia, vitreous opacities, degeneration, detachment or prolapse. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in vitreous body classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left EyeBaseline and Year 5The vitreous body of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as myodesopsia, vitreous opacities, degeneration, detachment or prolapse. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in vitreous body classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right EyeBaseline and Year 5The retinal aspect of the right eye (such as color anomalies) was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as deep red ocular fundus, fundus myopicus, retinal disorders, exudates or pigmentation. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal aspect classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left EyeBaseline and Year 5The retinal aspect of the left eye (such as color anomalies) was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as deep red ocular fundus, fundus myopicus, retinal disorders, exudates or pigmentation. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal aspect classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right EyeBaseline and Year 5The optic nerve and papilla of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as optic nerve cupping, optic nerve cup/disc ratio, or glaucomatous optic disc atrophy. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in optic nerve/papilla classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left EyeBaseline and Year 5The optic nerve and papilla of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as optic nerve cupping, optic nerve cup/disc ratio, or glaucomatous optic disc atrophy. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in optic nerve/papilla classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right EyeBaseline and Year 5The retinal blood vessels of the right eye were assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as retinal vascular disorder, retinopathy, and retinal hemorrhage. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal blood vessel classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left EyeBaseline and Year 5The retinal blood vessels of the left eye were assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as retinal vascular disorder, retinopathy, and retinal hemorrhage. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal blood vessel classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right EyeBaseline and Year 5The macula lutea of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as maculopathy, retinal pigmentation, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, retinal hemorrhage or aneurysm. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in macula lutea classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left EyeBaseline and Year 5The macula lutea of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as maculopathy, retinal pigmentation, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, retinal hemorrhage or aneurysm. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in macula lutea classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left EyeBaseline and Year 5The lens of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, lenticular opacities, vacuoles or pseudophakia. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in lens classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaBaseline and Year 5Enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells were evaluated and classified by histopathological examinations as Normal, Simple (diffuse) hyperplasia, or Linear, chain producing hyperplasia. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in ECL-cell classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.
Change From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyBaseline and Year 5Atrophy was assessed by histopathological examination of cells biopsied from the antrum and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in atrophy classification (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyBaseline and Year 5Atrophy was assessed by histopathological examination of cells biopsied from the corpus and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in atrophy classification (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).
Change From Baseline in Average Antrum Chronic Inflammation ScoreBaseline and Year 5Chronic inflammation of the antrum was assessed by histopathology and graded according to the Sydney classification: 0 = None; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = Severe
Change From Baseline in Corpus Chronic Inflammation ScoreBaseline and Year 5Chronic inflammation of the corpus was assessed by histopathology and graded according to the Sydney classification: 0 = None; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = Severe.
Change From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaBaseline and Year 5Intestinal metaplasia was assessed by biopsy and histopathological examination of the antrum and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in intestinal metaplasia classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 38 investigative sites in Germany from 18 June 2002 to 24 September 2008.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a historical diagnosis of Gastro Esophageal Reflux disease (GERD) received treatment with Lansoprazole at the usual dosage.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lansoprazole
Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. Depending on response, dosage could then be decreased to 15 mg, once daily, or increased to 30 mg, twice daily for up to 4 years and 10 months.
506
Total506

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLansoprazole
Age Continuous53.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Body Mass Index (BMI)28.09 kg/cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.15
Diagnosis of Reflux Disease
First diagnosis
150 participants
Diagnosis of Reflux Disease
Recurrence
356 participants
Height171.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
502 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Oriental
2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
218 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
288 Participants
Weight82.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
114 / 506
serious
Total, serious adverse events
82 / 506

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by Endoscopy

Los Angeles Classification is used to grade the extension of changes in the oesophagus induced by reflux disease (Grade 0: normal aspect of mucosa; Grade A: ≥1 mucosal breaks no longer than 5 mm; Grade B: ≥1 mucosal breaks \>5 mm long; Grade C: mucosal breaks extending between tops of two or more mucosal folds but are \<75% of the circumference; Grade D: mucosal breaks ≥75% of the circumference). Healed defined as anything less than Grade A criteria. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in Los Angeles classification between Baseline (table columns) and Week 8 (table rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade C0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade 038 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: No data130 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade A0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade B0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade C0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade B0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade A17 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: No data35 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade 097 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade B3 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade 079 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade A19 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade C0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: No data17 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: No data14 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade 017 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade C1 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade B1 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade A6 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade B1 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade C1 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade 04 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: No data0 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Reflux Disease as Assessed by EndoscopyWeek 8: Grade A2 participants
Primary

Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore Throat

Cough and sore throat symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild16 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Missing data19 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate3 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: None305 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: None71 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild4 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate3 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Missing data3 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: None24 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Missing data4 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild7 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate0 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild6 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Missing data1 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: None14 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Cough & Sore ThroatWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate2 participants
Primary

Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty Swallowing

Difficulty swallowing symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild7 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Missing data13 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate3 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: None293 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Missing data4 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild9 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: None89 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: None33 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild5 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Missing data5 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe1 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild2 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: None13 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate1 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Difficulty SwallowingWeek 8 Missing data2 participants
Primary

Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Heartburn

Heartburn symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: None59 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild7 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Missing data3 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate4 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: None117 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild27 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Missing data8 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Missing data14 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe2 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: None186 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate12 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - HeartburnWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild43 participants
Primary

Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & Vomiting

Nausea and vomiting symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild10 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Missing data15 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate2 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: None303 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate1 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Missing data10 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild9 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: None78 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate2 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: None25 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild9 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Missing data0 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild2 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: None13 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate2 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Nausea & VomitingWeek 8 Missing data1 participants
Primary

Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper Abdomen

Pain in the upper abdomen symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild9 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Missing data6 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: None124 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate4 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Missing data7 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild19 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: None125 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate2 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: None86 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild21 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Missing data10 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe3 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild10 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: None44 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate8 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptom - Pain in Upper AbdomenWeek 8 Missing data3 participants
Primary

Change From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid Regurgitation

Acid regurgitation symptoms were assessed by the Investigator at Baseline and the Week 8 visit. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in symptom intensity (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Week 8 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: Intent to treat population, including all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a subsequent rating of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild4 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Missing data3 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate1 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: None58 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Missing data4 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild19 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: None113 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate2 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: None125 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild28 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Missing data10 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Severe0 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Mild22 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: None81 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Symptoms: Moderate3 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Reflux Disease Symptoms - Acid RegurgitationWeek 8 Missing data8 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Antrum Atrophy

Atrophy was assessed by histopathological examination of cells biopsied from the antrum and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in atrophy classification (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Severe atrophy0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: No atrophy306 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: No data91 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Mild atrophy7 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Moderate atrophy4 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Severe atrophy0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Moderate atrophy5 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Mild atrophy1 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: No data28 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: No atrophy23 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Moderate atrophy1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: No atrophy4 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Mild atrophy1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Severe atrophy0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: No data1 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: No data0 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: No atrophy1 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Severe atrophy0 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Moderate atrophy0 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Mild atrophy0 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Moderate atrophy0 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Severe atrophy1 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: No atrophy23 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: No data7 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Antrum AtrophyYear 5: Mild atrophy2 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal Metaplasia

Intestinal metaplasia was assessed by biopsy and histopathological examination of the antrum and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in intestinal metaplasia classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Severe0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Mild6 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: No data108 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Moderate5 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: None319 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Moderate1 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Severe0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: No data12 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Mild2 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: None13 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Moderate1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: None4 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Mild2 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Severe0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: No data0 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Severe0 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Mild2 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: None23 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Moderate1 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Antrum Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: No data7 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Antrum Chronic Inflammation Score

Chronic inflammation of the antrum was assessed by histopathology and graded according to the Sydney classification: 0 = None; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = Severe

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NoneChange From Baseline in Average Antrum Chronic Inflammation ScoreBaseline (n=473)0.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
NoneChange From Baseline in Average Antrum Chronic Inflammation ScoreChange from Baseline (n=353)-0.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Follicle Stimulating Hormone

The change between follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) measured at year 5 in males including final visit and follicle stimulating hormone measured at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5.

Population: Safety analysis set, including all male participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NoneChange From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Follicle Stimulating HormoneChange from Baseline (n=214)0.39 IU/LStandard Deviation 4.714
NoneChange From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Follicle Stimulating HormoneBaseline (n=286)7.62 IU/LStandard Deviation 7.864
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Luteinizing Hormone

The change between luteinizing hormone measured at year 5 in males including final visit and luteinizing hormone measured at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, including all male participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NoneChange From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Luteinizing HormoneBaseline (n=286)4.73 IU/LStandard Deviation 3.183
NoneChange From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Luteinizing HormoneChange from Baseline (n=214)0.71 IU/LStandard Deviation 3.101
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Blood Analysis - Testosterone

The change between testosterone measured at year 5 in males including final visit and Testosterone measured at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, including all male participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NoneChange From Baseline in Blood Analysis - TestosteroneBaseline (n=285)4.57 µg/LStandard Deviation 1.566
NoneChange From Baseline in Blood Analysis - TestosteroneChange from Baseline (n=214)0.16 µg/LStandard Deviation 1.275
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Corpus Atrophy

Atrophy was assessed by histopathological examination of cells biopsied from the corpus and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in atrophy classification (mild, moderate, severe or none) between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Severe atrophy0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Mild atrophy9 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: No data105 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Moderate atrophy7 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: No atrophy330 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Moderate atrophy2 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Severe atrophy1 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: No data8 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Mild atrophy0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: No atrophy12 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Moderate atrophy1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: No atrophy1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Mild atrophy0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Severe atrophy0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: No data0 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Severe atrophy1 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Mild atrophy1 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: No atrophy17 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: Moderate atrophy0 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Corpus AtrophyYear 5: No data11 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Corpus Chronic Inflammation Score

Chronic inflammation of the corpus was assessed by histopathology and graded according to the Sydney classification: 0 = None; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = Severe.

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus Chronic Inflammation ScoreBaseline (n=476)0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus Chronic Inflammation ScoreChange from Baseline (n=363)-0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal Metaplasia

Intestinal metaplasia was assessed by biopsy and histopathological examination of the corpus and classified according to the Sydney classification as mild, moderate, severe or none. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in intestinal metaplasia classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Severe0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Moderate0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: None359 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Mild1 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: No data112 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Moderate0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: None1 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Mild2 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Severe0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: No data1 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: No data11 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Severe0 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: None18 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Moderate1 participants
Grade DChange From Baseline in Corpus Intestinal MetaplasiaYear 5: Mild0 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell Hyperplasia

Enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells were evaluated and classified by histopathological examinations as Normal, Simple (diffuse) hyperplasia, or Linear, chain producing hyperplasia. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in ECL-cell classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows) for all patients.

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, including all participants who received any study medication. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Normal315 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Simple hyperplasia10 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Linear hyperplasia13 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: No data108 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Simple hyperplasia2 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Linear hyperplasia0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: No data3 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Normal8 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Linear hyperplasia0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Simple hyperplasia0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: No data0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Normal1 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: No data14 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Simple hyperplasia4 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Normal26 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Enterochromaffin-like Cell HyperplasiaYear 5: Linear hyperplasia2 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Accommodation

Accommodation is the adjustment of the focal length of the eye lens to keep an object in focus on the retina as its distance from the eye varies, and is measured in diopters: Diopters = 1/(focal length).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - AccommodationRight Eye: Baseline (n=424)2.877 dioptersStandard Deviation 2.884
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - AccommodationRight Eye: Change from Baseline (n=348)-0.090 dioptersStandard Deviation 2.634
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - AccommodationLeft Eye: Baseline (n=426)2.835 dioptersStandard Deviation 2.831
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - AccommodationLeft Eye: Change from Baseline (n=349)-0.073 dioptersStandard Deviation 2.585
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With Glare

Adaptation is the ability of the eye to adjust to various levels of darkness and light. Normal and pathological status of adaptation with glare was defined as follows: * Normal status: Contrast between 1:0.05 and 1:23.5. * Pathological status: Contrast = 0 or contrast \> 1:23.5. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in the classification of adaptation with glare between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Missing data75 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Decreased due to age2 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Pathological8 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Normal33 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Decreased due to age4 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Pathological0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Normal2 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Missing data2 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Pathological16 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Decreased due to age0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Normal24 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Missing data12 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Normal251 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Decreased due to age1 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Missing data58 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation With GlareYear 5: Pathological18 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without Glare

Adaptation is the ability of the eye to adjust to various levels of darkness and light. Normal and pathological status of adaptation without glare was defined as follows: * Normal status: Contrast between 1:0.05 and 1:23.5. * Pathological status: Contrast = 0 or contrast \> 1:23.5. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in the classification of adaptation without glare between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Missing data62 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Decreased due to age0 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Pathological1 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Normal30 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Decreased due to age4 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Pathological0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Normal2 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Missing data1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Pathological10 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Decreased due to age0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Normal16 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Missing data4 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Normal288 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Decreased due to age1 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Missing data73 participants
SevereChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Adaptation Without GlareYear 5: Pathological14 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left Eye

The macula lutea of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as maculopathy, retinal pigmentation, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, retinal hemorrhage or aneurysm. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in macula lutea classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal10 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left EyeYear 5: No data46 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological1 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal323 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left EyeYear 5: No data77 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological18 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left EyeYear 5: No data4 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological22 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal5 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right Eye

The macula lutea of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as maculopathy, retinal pigmentation, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, retinal hemorrhage or aneurysm. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in macula lutea classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal10 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right EyeYear 5: No data49 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological1 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal317 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right EyeYear 5: No data75 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological20 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right EyeYear 5: No data4 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological27 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Macula Lutea of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal3 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left Eye

The optic nerve and papilla of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as optic nerve cupping, optic nerve cup/disc ratio, or glaucomatous optic disc atrophy. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in optic nerve/papilla classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal11 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left EyeYear 5: No data46 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal339 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left EyeYear 5: No data75 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological8 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left EyeYear 5: No data6 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological17 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal4 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right Eye

The optic nerve and papilla of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as optic nerve cupping, optic nerve cup/disc ratio, or glaucomatous optic disc atrophy. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in optic nerve/papilla classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal11 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right EyeYear 5: No data48 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal337 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right EyeYear 5: No data76 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological9 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right EyeYear 5: No data4 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological17 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Optic Nerve and Papilla of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal4 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left Eye

The retinal aspect of the left eye (such as color anomalies) was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as deep red ocular fundus, fundus myopicus, retinal disorders, exudates or pigmentation. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal aspect classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal11 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left EyeYear 5: No data46 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal361 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left EyeYear 5: No data80 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left EyeYear 5: No data1 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological5 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal1 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right Eye

The retinal aspect of the right eye (such as color anomalies) was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as deep red ocular fundus, fundus myopicus, retinal disorders, exudates or pigmentation. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal aspect classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal11 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right EyeYear 5: No data48 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal356 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right EyeYear 5: No data80 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological2 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right EyeYear 5: No data0 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological8 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Aspect of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal1 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left Eye

The retinal blood vessels of the left eye were assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as retinal vascular disorder, retinopathy, and retinal hemorrhage. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal blood vessel classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal7 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left EyeYear 5: No data46 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological4 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal278 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left EyeYear 5: No data68 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological23 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left EyeYear 5: No data13 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left EyeYear 5: Pathological60 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Left EyeYear 5: Normal7 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right Eye

The retinal blood vessels of the right eye were assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as retinal vascular disorder, retinopathy, and retinal hemorrhage. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in retinal blood vessel classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal7 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right EyeYear 5: No data48 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological4 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal279 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right EyeYear 5: No data68 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological22 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right EyeYear 5: No data12 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right EyeYear 5: Pathological60 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Assessment of Retinal Blood Vessels of the Right EyeYear 5: Normal6 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color Vision

Color vision was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and classified as normal or pathological. Pathological findings include abnormal color vision tests, color blindness and anomalous quotient. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in color vision classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color VisionYear 5: Normal12 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color VisionYear 5: No data46 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color VisionYear 5: Pathological0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color VisionYear 5: Normal320 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color VisionYear 5: No data76 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color VisionYear 5: Pathological10 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color VisionYear 5: No data5 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color VisionYear 5: Pathological27 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Color VisionYear 5: Normal10 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left Eye

The cornea of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, corneal degeneration, opacity, scars or deposits. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in corneal classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Normal11 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: No data46 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Pathological0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Normal348 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: No data77 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Pathological4 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: No data4 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Pathological11 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Normal5 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right Eye

The cornea of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, corneal degeneration, opacity, scars or deposits. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in corneal classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Normal11 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: No data46 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Pathological0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Normal343 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: No data78 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Pathological4 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: No data3 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Pathological16 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Cornea Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Normal5 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left Eye

The lens of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, lenticular opacities, vacuoles or pseudophakia. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in lens classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Normal6 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: No data46 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Pathological5 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Normal193 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: No data56 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Pathological43 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: No data25 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Pathological124 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Normal8 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right Eye

The lens of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as cataracts, lenticular opacities, vacuoles or pseudophakia. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in lens classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Normal8 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: No data46 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Pathological3 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Normal193 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: No data56 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Pathological44 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: No data25 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Pathological124 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Lens Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Normal7 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left Eye

The vitreous body of the left eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as myodesopsia, vitreous opacities, degeneration, detachment or prolapse. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in vitreous body classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Normal12 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: No data47 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Pathological0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Normal341 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: No data73 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Pathological7 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: No data7 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Pathological16 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Left EyeYear 5: Normal3 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right Eye

The vitreous body of the right eye was assessed by an Ophthalmologist and judged to be normal or pathological at Baseline and at Year 5. Pathological classification includes abnormal findings such as myodesopsia, vitreous opacities, degeneration, detachment or prolapse. Normal indicates no pathological findings were observed. The shift table below summarizes the individual transitions in vitreous body classification between Baseline (depicted in the columns) and Year 5 (depicted in the rows).

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Normal11 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: No data46 participants
NoneChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Pathological0 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Normal338 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: No data73 participants
MildChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Pathological11 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: No data8 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Pathological17 participants
ModerateChange From Baseline in Ophthalmologic Examination - Vitreous Body Assessment of Right EyeYear 5: Normal2 participants
Secondary

Ophthalmologic Examination - Visual Acuity

Visual Acuity was measured using the Snellen eye chart at a distance of 6 meters. Acuity is expressed as a ratio of the test distance (6 M) / the distance the average eye can see the letters on a certain line of the eye chart. Visual acuity of 1 is normal; an individual with acuity of 0.5 could only recognize an object at half the distance compared to an individual with normal acuity.

Time frame: Baseline and Year 5

Population: Safety analysis set, where data were available. Last observation carried forward was utilized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NoneOphthalmologic Examination - Visual AcuityRight Eye: Acuity at Baseline (n=443)0.927 ratioStandard Deviation 0.174
NoneOphthalmologic Examination - Visual AcuityRight Eye: Acuity at Year 5 (n=376)0.904 ratioStandard Deviation 0.186
NoneOphthalmologic Examination - Visual AcuityLeft Eye: Acuity at Baseline (n=447)0.919 ratioStandard Deviation 0.181
NoneOphthalmologic Examination - Visual AcuityLeft Eye: Acuity at Year 5 (n=379)0.894 ratioStandard Deviation 0.205

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026