Skip to content

Study HZA106829: Efficacy/Safety Study of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol (GW642444) in Adult and Adolescent Asthmatics

HZA106829: A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study of Fluticasone Furoate/GW642444 Inhalation Powder, Fluticasone Furoate Inhalation Powder Alone, and Fluticasone Propionate Alone in the Treatment of Persistent Asthma in Adults and Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01134042
Enrollment
587
Registered
2010-05-31
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2017-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Fluticasone propionate, asthma, vilanterol, GW642444, Fluticasone furoate

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (GW642444) inhalation powder administered once daily each evening with fluticasone furoate inhalation powder administered alone once daily each evening in adolescent and adult subjects 12 years of age and older with persistent bronchial asthma over a 24-week period.

Interventions

Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol inhalation powder inhaled orally once daily for 24 weeks

Fluticasone furoate inhalation powder inhaled orally once daily for 24 weeks

Fluticasone propionate inhalation powder inhaled orally twice daily for 24 weeks

OTHERPlacebo Inhalation Powder 1

Placebo in novel dry powder inhaler once daily

OTHERPlacebo Inhalation Powder 2

Placebo in Diskus inhaler twice daily

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Outpatient at least 12 years of age * Both genders; females of childbearing potential must be willing to use birth control method * Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of 40-90% predicted * Reversibility FEV1 of at least 12% and 200mls * Current asthma therapy that includes an inhaled corticosteroid for at least 12 weeks prior to first visit

Exclusion criteria

* History of life-threatening asthma * Respiratory infection or oral candidiasis * Asthma exacerbation within 12 weeks * Concurrent respiratory disease or other disease that would confound study participation or affect subject safety * Allergies to study drugs, study drugs' excipients, medications related to study drugs * Taking another investigational medication or medication prohibited for use during this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at the End of the 24-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 24FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 is defined as the clinic visit (pre-bronchodilator and pre-dose) FEV1 measurement taken at the clinic visit while still on treatment. Pre-dose and pre-rescue albuterol/salbutamol trough FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry in the evening at the Baseline (BL) through Week 24 clinic visits. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. BL was the pre-dose value obtained at Visit 3. Change from BL was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with covariates of BL trough FEV1, country, sex, age, and treatment group.The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement at scheduled clinic visits was used to impute the missing measurements.
Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 24Baseline and Week 24FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Baseline and Week 24 clinic visits. Weighted mean was calculated using the 24-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 5 minutes prior to dosing) and the post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the average Week 24 FEV1 value minus the Baseline value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free and Symptom-free 24-hour Periods at the End of the 24-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 24The number of inhalations of rescue bronchodilator, albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol, used during the day and night was recorded by the participants in a daily electronic diary (eDiary). Similarly, asthma symptoms were recorded in a daily eDairy by the participants every day in the morning and evening before taking any rescue or study medication and before the peak expiratory flow measurement. A 24-hour period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no use of rescue medication/symptoms was considered to be rescue free/symptom free. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 24-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12 and Week 24/Early WithdrawalBaseline, Week 12, and Week 24/Early WithdrawalThe AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire used to evaluate the impact of asthma treatments on the quality of life of asthma sufferers. The AQLQ for 12 years and older (AQLQ \[+12\]) is a modified version of the AQLQ for use in asthma patients between the age of 12 and 70. The AQLQ contains 32 items in 4 domains: activity limitation (11 items), symptoms (12 items), emotional function (5 items), and environmental stimuli (4 items). For the 32 items on the questionnaire, the response format consists of a seven-point scale, where a value of 1 indicates total impairment and a value of 7 indicates no impairment. The AQLQ total score is defined as the average of the scores from all 32 questions; thus, the total score ranges from 1 (indicates total impairment) to 7 (indicates no impairment). Baseline was the total score obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Weeks 12 and 24 minus the total score at Baseline.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Scores at Week 12 and Week 24Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24/Early WithdrawalThe ACT is a 5-item questionnaire developed as a measure of the participant's asthma control. Questions are designed to be self-completed by the participant and include the following: In the past 4 weeks, How much of the time did your asthma keep you from getting as much done at work, school or at home?, How often have you had shortness of breath?, How often did your asthma symptoms wake you up at night or earlier than usual in the morning?, How often have you used your rescue inhaler or nebulizer medication (such as albuterol)? and How would you rate your asthma control? The ACT total score is defined as the sum of the scores from all 5 questions, provided all questions have been answered; thus, the total score ranges from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma). A score of 20 or higher indicates well-controlled asthma. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 and Week 24/Early Withdrawal minus the total score at Baseline.
Clinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1at Week 24Week 24FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. 12-hour post-dose FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Week 24 clinic visit. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded.
Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline up to Week 24/Withdrawal VisitAll unscheduled asthma-related visits to a physician's office, visits to urgent care, visits to the emergency department, and hospitalizations (ICU=intensive care unit; GW=general ward) associated with severe asthma exacerbations or other asthma-related healthcare issues were recorded.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24/Early WithdrawalAt the end of Week 4, Week 8, and Week 24/Early Withdrawal, the Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire that assesses changes in asthma symptoms (AS) and rescue medication use (RMU) was completed by the participants. The number of participants who chose the following answers to the questionnaire were determined: much better, somewhat better, a little better, the same, a little worse, somewhat worse, much worse (to assess the changes in asthma symptoms); much less often, somewhat less often, a little less often, the same, a little more often, somewhat more often, much more often (to assess the changes in the frequency of rescue medication use).
Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose at Week 24Baseline and Week 24FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at Baseline. Weighted mean was calculated using the 4-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 5 minutes prior to dosing) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the average Week 24 FEV1 value minus the Baseline value.
Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline up to Week 12 and Week 24PEF is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each morning and evening prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Trough PEF is the PEF measured approximately 24 hours after the last administration of study drug. Change from Baseline (defined as the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily trough AM/PM PEF over 12 weeks and 24 weeks of the 24-week Treatment Period (at Weeks 12 and 24) minus the Baseline value.
The Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 24-week Treatment PeriodFrom the first dose of the study medication up to Week 24/Early WithdrawalThe number of participants whose primary reason for withdrawal was lack of efficacy was analyzed.

Countries

Germany, Japan, Poland, Romania, Russia, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants (par.) meeting eligibility criteria at the Screening visit entered a 4-week Run-in Period for completion of Baseline (BL) safety evaluations and to obtain BL measures of asthma status. Par. were then randomized to a 24-week Treatment Period. 1206 par. were screened, 587 were randomized, and 586 received \>=1 dose of study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FF 200 µg OD
Participants received FF 200 µg inhalation powder via a Dry Powder Inhaler DPI OD in the evening plus placebo via the DISKUS/ACCUHALER BID, for 24 weeks. Additionally participants were provided with albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol to be used as rescue medication as needed.
194
FF/VI 200/25 µg OD
Participants received FF/VI 200/25 µg inhalation powder via a DPI OD in the evening plus placebo via the DISKUS/ACCUHALER BID, for 24 weeks. Additionally participants were provided with albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol to be used as rescue medication as needed.
197
FP 500 µg BID
Participants received FP 500 µg inhalation powder via the DISKUS/ACCUHALER BID plus placebo via a DPI OD in the evening, for 24 weeks. Additionally participants were provided albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol to be used as rescue medication as needed.
195
Total586

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event372
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy21618
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up201
Overall StudyPhysician Decision481
Overall StudyProtocol Violation535
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1347

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFF 200 µg ODFF/VI 200/25 µg ODFP 500 µg BIDTotal
Age, Continuous44.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.33
46.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.05
47.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.06
46.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.51
Gender
Female
113 Participants116 Participants116 Participants345 Participants
Gender
Male
81 Participants81 Participants79 Participants241 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage and White
1 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage (HER)
16 participants16 participants19 participants51 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Japanese/East Asian HER/South East Asian HER
12 participants15 participants13 participants40 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
165 participants165 participants162 participants492 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
66 / 19462 / 19773 / 195
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1946 / 1972 / 195

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at the End of the 24-week Treatment Period

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 is defined as the clinic visit (pre-bronchodilator and pre-dose) FEV1 measurement taken at the clinic visit while still on treatment. Pre-dose and pre-rescue albuterol/salbutamol trough FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry in the evening at the Baseline (BL) through Week 24 clinic visits. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. BL was the pre-dose value obtained at Visit 3. Change from BL was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with covariates of BL trough FEV1, country, sex, age, and treatment group.The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement at scheduled clinic visits was used to impute the missing measurements.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants randomized to treatment who received at least one dose of the study medication. Only those participants with non-missing covariates and a post-Baseline FEV1 measurement were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF 200 µg ODChange From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at the End of the 24-week Treatment Period0.201 LitersStandard Error 0.0303
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at the End of the 24-week Treatment Period0.394 LitersStandard Error 0.0302
FP 500 µg BIDChange From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at the End of the 24-week Treatment Period0.183 LitersStandard Error 0.03
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.108, 0.277]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.127, 0.294]ANCOVA
95% CI: [-0.066, 0.102]
Primary

Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Baseline and Week 24 clinic visits. Weighted mean was calculated using the 24-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 5 minutes prior to dosing) and the post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the average Week 24 FEV1 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Weighted mean serial FEV1 was calculated in the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 at Week 24 was performed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF 200 µg ODChange From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 240.328 LitersStandard Error 0.0493
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 240.464 LitersStandard Error 0.047
FP 500 µg BIDChange From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 240.258 LitersStandard Error 0.0483
p-value: 0.04895% CI: [0.001, 0.27]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [0.073, 0.339]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free and Symptom-free 24-hour Periods at the End of the 24-week Treatment Period

The number of inhalations of rescue bronchodilator, albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol, used during the day and night was recorded by the participants in a daily electronic diary (eDiary). Similarly, asthma symptoms were recorded in a daily eDairy by the participants every day in the morning and evening before taking any rescue or study medication and before the peak expiratory flow measurement. A 24-hour period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no use of rescue medication/symptoms was considered to be rescue free/symptom free. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 24-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF 200 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free and Symptom-free 24-hour Periods at the End of the 24-week Treatment PeriodRescue-free 24-hour periods26.6 Percentage of periodsStandard Error 2.45
FF 200 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free and Symptom-free 24-hour Periods at the End of the 24-week Treatment PeriodSymptom-free 24-hour periods21.0 Percentage of periodsStandard Error 2.32
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free and Symptom-free 24-hour Periods at the End of the 24-week Treatment PeriodRescue-free 24-hour periods38.2 Percentage of periodsStandard Error 2.42
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free and Symptom-free 24-hour Periods at the End of the 24-week Treatment PeriodSymptom-free 24-hour periods29.3 Percentage of periodsStandard Error 2.29
FP 500 µg BIDChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free and Symptom-free 24-hour Periods at the End of the 24-week Treatment PeriodRescue-free 24-hour periods31.9 Percentage of periodsStandard Error 2.45
FP 500 µg BIDChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free and Symptom-free 24-hour Periods at the End of the 24-week Treatment PeriodSymptom-free 24-hour periods24.5 Percentage of periodsStandard Error 2.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12 and Week 24/Early Withdrawal

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire used to evaluate the impact of asthma treatments on the quality of life of asthma sufferers. The AQLQ for 12 years and older (AQLQ \[+12\]) is a modified version of the AQLQ for use in asthma patients between the age of 12 and 70. The AQLQ contains 32 items in 4 domains: activity limitation (11 items), symptoms (12 items), emotional function (5 items), and environmental stimuli (4 items). For the 32 items on the questionnaire, the response format consists of a seven-point scale, where a value of 1 indicates total impairment and a value of 7 indicates no impairment. The AQLQ total score is defined as the average of the scores from all 32 questions; thus, the total score ranges from 1 (indicates total impairment) to 7 (indicates no impairment). Baseline was the total score obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Weeks 12 and 24 minus the total score at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF 200 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12 and Week 24/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, n=154, 180, 1630.66 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.061
FF 200 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12 and Week 24/Early WithdrawalWeek 24, n=140, 167, 1560.88 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12 and Week 24/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, n=154, 180, 1630.74 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.056
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12 and Week 24/Early WithdrawalWeek 24, n=140, 167, 1560.93 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.065
FP 500 µg BIDChange From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12 and Week 24/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, n=154, 180, 1630.74 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.059
FP 500 µg BIDChange From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12 and Week 24/Early WithdrawalWeek 24, n=140, 167, 1560.90 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.068
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Scores at Week 12 and Week 24

The ACT is a 5-item questionnaire developed as a measure of the participant's asthma control. Questions are designed to be self-completed by the participant and include the following: In the past 4 weeks, How much of the time did your asthma keep you from getting as much done at work, school or at home?, How often have you had shortness of breath?, How often did your asthma symptoms wake you up at night or earlier than usual in the morning?, How often have you used your rescue inhaler or nebulizer medication (such as albuterol)? and How would you rate your asthma control? The ACT total score is defined as the sum of the scores from all 5 questions, provided all questions have been answered; thus, the total score ranges from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma). A score of 20 or higher indicates well-controlled asthma. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 and Week 24/Early Withdrawal minus the total score at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF 200 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Scores at Week 12 and Week 24Week 12, n=164, 183, 1693.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
FF 200 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Scores at Week 12 and Week 24Week 24, n=147, 170, 1625.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Scores at Week 12 and Week 24Week 12, n=164, 183, 1694.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Scores at Week 12 and Week 24Week 24, n=147, 170, 1625.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
FP 500 µg BIDChange From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Scores at Week 12 and Week 24Week 12, n=164, 183, 1693.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
FP 500 µg BIDChange From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Scores at Week 12 and Week 24Week 24, n=147, 170, 1624.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at Baseline. Weighted mean was calculated using the 4-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 5 minutes prior to dosing) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the average Week 24 FEV1 value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Weighted mean serial FEV1 was calculated in the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 at Week 24 was performed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FF 200 µg ODChange From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose at Week 240.363 LitersStandard Deviation 0.469
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose at Week 240.492 LitersStandard Deviation 0.5671
FP 500 µg BIDChange From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0 to 4 Hours Post-dose at Week 240.256 LitersStandard Deviation 0.4679
Other Pre-specified

Clinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. 12-hour post-dose FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Week 24 clinic visit. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT Population. 12-hour post-dose FEV1 was analyzed in the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 at Week 24 was performed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FF 200 µg ODClinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1at Week 242.611 LitersStandard Deviation 0.8437
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODClinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1at Week 242.683 LitersStandard Deviation 0.9758
FP 500 µg BIDClinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1at Week 242.262 LitersStandard Deviation 0.7786
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment Period

PEF is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each morning and evening prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Trough PEF is the PEF measured approximately 24 hours after the last administration of study drug. Change from Baseline (defined as the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily trough AM/PM PEF over 12 weeks and 24 weeks of the 24-week Treatment Period (at Weeks 12 and 24) minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 12 and Week 24

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF 200 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodAM PEF, Week 1 to 12, n=193, 197, 19515.1 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.82
FF 200 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodAM PEF, Week 1 to 24, n=193, 197, 19518.2 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.97
FF 200 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodPM PEF, Week 1 to 12, 192, 197, 1947.5 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.8
FF 200 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodPM PEF, Week 1 to 24, 192, 197, 1949.1 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.98
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodPM PEF, Week 1 to 24, 192, 197, 19439.8 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.93
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodAM PEF, Week 1 to 12, n=193, 197, 19548.1 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.78
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodPM PEF, Week 1 to 12, 192, 197, 19436.6 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.75
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodAM PEF, Week 1 to 24, n=193, 197, 19551.8 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.94
FP 500 µg BIDMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodPM PEF, Week 1 to 24, 192, 197, 19413.6 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.96
FP 500 µg BIDMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodAM PEF, Week 1 to 24, n=193, 197, 19518.8 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.95
FP 500 µg BIDMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodPM PEF, Week 1 to 12, 192, 197, 19412.6 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.78
FP 500 µg BIDMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning Trough (AM) and Evening (PM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the First 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks of the 24-week Treatment PeriodAM PEF, Week 1 to 12, n=193, 197, 19517.1 Liters/minute (L/min)Standard Error 2.8
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24

At the end of Week 4, Week 8, and Week 24/Early Withdrawal, the Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire that assesses changes in asthma symptoms (AS) and rescue medication use (RMU) was completed by the participants. The number of participants who chose the following answers to the questionnaire were determined: much better, somewhat better, a little better, the same, a little worse, somewhat worse, much worse (to assess the changes in asthma symptoms); much less often, somewhat less often, a little less often, the same, a little more often, somewhat more often, much more often (to assess the changes in the frequency of rescue medication use).

Time frame: Week 4, Week 12, and Week 24/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed at different time points, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Somewhat less often, n=174, 191, 18029 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Much better, n=146, 168, 16264 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Somewhat better, n=146, 168, 16243 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: A little better, n=146, 168, 16222 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: A little less often, n=174, 191, 18042 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: The same, n=146, 168, 16211 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: A little worse, n=146, 168, 1623 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Somewhat worse, n=146, 168, 1622 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: The same, n=174, 191, 18034 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Much worse, n=146, 168, 1621 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Much less often, n=146, 168, 16268 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: The same, n=174, 191, 18035 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Somewhat less often, n=150, 187, 1833 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: A little more often, n=174, 191, 18014 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: A little less often, n=150, 187, 1829 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: The same, n=146, 168, 16212 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: A little more often, n= 142, 168, 161 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Somewhat more often, n=174, 191, 1805 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Somewhat more often, n=146, 168, 1623 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Much more often, n=146, 168, 1620 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Much more often, n=174, 191, 1801 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: A little worse, n=174, 191, 1808 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Much better, n=162, 183, 16560 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Somewhat better, n=162, 183, 16543 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Somewhat better, n=174, 191, 18047 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: A little better, n=162, 183, 16527 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Somewhat worse, n=174, 191, 1802 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: The same, n=162, 183, 16523 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: A little worse, n=162, 183, 1658 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Somewhat worse, n=162, 183, 1650 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Much worse, n=162, 183, 1651 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Much worse, n=174, 191, 1802 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Much less often, n=162, 183, 16466 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Somewhat less often, n=162, 183, 16431 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: A little less often, n=162, 183, 16428 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Much better, n=174, 191, 18037 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: The same, n=162, 183, 16426 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Much less often, n=174, 191, 18049 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: A little more often, n=162, 183, 1647 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Somewhat more often, n=162, 183, 1642 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: A little better, n=174, 191, 18043 participants
FF 200 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Much more often, n=162, 183, 1642 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Much less often, n=162, 183, 16490 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Somewhat worse, n=162, 183, 1651 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Much better, n=146, 168, 16289 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Somewhat less often, n=174, 191, 18048 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Much more often, n=174, 191, 1801 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Somewhat better, n=146, 168, 16237 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: A little better, n=174, 191, 18034 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: A little more often, n=162, 183, 1648 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: A little better, n=146, 168, 16223 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Much worse, n=162, 183, 1650 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Much better, n=162, 183, 16578 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: The same, n=146, 168, 16214 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: A little less often, n=174, 191, 18038 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: A little worse, n=174, 191, 1807 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: A little worse, n=146, 168, 1624 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Much better, n=174, 191, 18058 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Much less often, n=174, 191, 18071 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Somewhat worse, n=146, 168, 1621 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Somewhat better, n=162, 183, 16551 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: The same, n=162, 183, 16424 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Much worse, n=146, 168, 1620 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: The same, n=174, 191, 18027 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Much more often, n=162, 183, 1641 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Much less often, n=146, 168, 16287 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: A little better, n=162, 183, 16533 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Somewhat less often, n=162, 183, 16436 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Somewhat less often, n=150, 187, 1838 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Much worse, n=174, 191, 1800 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: The same, n=162, 183, 16515 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: A little less often, n=150, 187, 1822 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: A little more often, n=174, 191, 1804 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Somewhat worse, n=174, 191, 1802 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: The same, n=146, 168, 16216 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: The same, n=174, 191, 18025 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Somewhat more often, n=162, 183, 1640 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: A little more often, n= 142, 168, 163 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: A little worse, n=162, 183, 1655 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Somewhat better, n=174, 191, 18065 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Somewhat more often, n=146, 168, 1621 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Somewhat more often, n=174, 191, 1802 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: A little less often, n=162, 183, 16424 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Much more often, n=146, 168, 1621 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: A little more often, n=162, 183, 1646 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Much less often, n=162, 183, 16459 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Much more often, n=146, 168, 1622 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Much better, n=174, 191, 18035 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Somewhat better, n=174, 191, 18049 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: A little better, n=174, 191, 18040 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: The same, n=174, 191, 18044 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: A little worse, n=174, 191, 1806 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Somewhat worse, n=174, 191, 1803 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, AS: Much worse, n=174, 191, 1803 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Much less often, n=174, 191, 18042 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Somewhat less often, n=174, 191, 18041 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: A little less often, n=174, 191, 18045 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: The same, n=174, 191, 18037 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: A little more often, n=174, 191, 1809 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Somewhat more often, n=174, 191, 1803 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 4, RMU: Much more often, n=174, 191, 1803 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Much better, n=162, 183, 16554 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Somewhat better, n=162, 183, 16552 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: A little better, n=162, 183, 16534 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: The same, n=162, 183, 16516 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: A little worse, n=162, 183, 1656 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Much worse, n=162, 183, 1650 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Somewhat less often, n=162, 183, 16437 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: A little less often, n=162, 183, 16440 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: The same, n=162, 183, 16420 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, AS: Somewhat worse, n=162, 183, 1653 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Somewhat more often, n=162, 183, 1641 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 12, RMU: Much more often, n=162, 183, 1641 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Much better, n=146, 168, 16262 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Somewhat better, n=146, 168, 16252 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: A little better, n=146, 168, 16217 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: The same, n=146, 168, 16223 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: A little worse, n=146, 168, 1624 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Somewhat worse, n=146, 168, 1622 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, AS: Much worse, n=146, 168, 1622 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Much less often, n=146, 168, 16269 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Somewhat less often, n=150, 187, 1837 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: A little less often, n=150, 187, 1826 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: The same, n=146, 168, 16219 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: A little more often, n= 142, 168, 168 participants
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire Responses at Weeks 4, 12, and 24Week 24, RMU: Somewhat more often, n=146, 168, 1621 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period

All unscheduled asthma-related visits to a physician's office, visits to urgent care, visits to the emergency department, and hospitalizations (ICU=intensive care unit; GW=general ward) associated with severe asthma exacerbations or other asthma-related healthcare issues were recorded.

Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 24/Withdrawal Visit

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FF 200 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Night)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF 200 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization Days (ICU)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF 200 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization (GW) Days0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.29
FF 200 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Urgent Care/Outpatient Clinic Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF 200 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Day)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.07
FF 200 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Physician Office/Practice Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.1
FF 200 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Emergency Room Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.07
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Urgent Care/Outpatient Clinic Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Emergency Room Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization Days (ICU)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Night)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Physician Office/Practice Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization (GW) Days0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Day)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization (GW) Days0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Day)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Night)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Physician Office/Practice Visits0.1 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.45
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Urgent Care/Outpatient Clinic Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Emergency Room Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FP 500 µg BIDNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization Days (ICU)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
Other Pre-specified

The Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 24-week Treatment Period

The number of participants whose primary reason for withdrawal was lack of efficacy was analyzed.

Time frame: From the first dose of the study medication up to Week 24/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FF 200 µg ODThe Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 24-week Treatment Period21 participants
FF/VI 200/25 µg ODThe Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 24-week Treatment Period6 participants
FP 500 µg BIDThe Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 24-week Treatment Period18 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026