Skip to content

Variation In Success of Intravenous (IV) Placement With Observation Using New Techniques

The VISION STUDY: Variation In Success of Intravenous (IV) Placement With Observation Using New Techniques

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01133652
Acronym
VISION
Enrollment
399
Registered
2010-05-31
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2012-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Catheterization, Peripheral Phlebotomy

Keywords

Venipuncture, Randomized Controlled Trial, Intravenous access, Children, Pediatric Emergency Department, Peripheral intravenous catheterization, Catheterization, Peripheral Phlebotomy

Brief summary

Children fear having an intravenous (IV) needle placed because of the pain that they will experience. The more needle punctures that a child has to endure before the IV is successfully placed, the greater the pain experienced and anxiety suffered. In addition, false starts increase the demands on medical staff and can increase the length of the emergency department stay. Often, veins are difficult to see or feel, particularly in an unwell, dehydrated child or in young infants who have more fat below the skin surface. Also, the venous pattern below the skin surface naturally varies from person to person and therefore success in placing IVs leaves room for improvement. Technology may be able to play an important role is improving the rates of success. The investigators wish to investigate whether the use of either an Ultrasound machine or a VeinViewer machine can improve the rate of success of the initial attempt (skin puncture) at peripheral IV placement in comparison to the current standard approach.

Detailed description

Peripheral IV line placement is one of the most common and challenging painful procedures performed in the pediatric emergency department (PED). The lack of a clear visual guide for IV placement often leads to multiple painful attempts; delays in urgent treatment; increased use of human resources; increased costs; and increased anxiety in the patient, the parents and the staff. The research plan is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the use of two new technologies with the current standard method for vein location and IV placement in children.We would like to know if either of these technologies improve rates of successful IV placement on first attempt. Furthermore we would like to know if either technology leads to decreased time spent by staff on the procedure or decreased overall number of painful attempts. Information on nursing satisfaction, parental satisfaction and cost analysis will also be obtained.

Interventions

Veinviewer machine

DEVICEUltrasound

Ultrasound

Conventional IV placement by nurses

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children 0-16 presenting to the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) * Require IV as part of routine care * Knowledge of English language

Exclusion criteria

* Child in critical condition * Child requires urgent IV placement * Central line available

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success or failure of peripheral IV placement on first attempt.Within one hour of start of procedureThe time to placement of a successful intravenous catheter is variable but is generally completed within one hour. This is an estimated timeframe.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of attempts to successful IV placementWithin one hour of start of procedureThe time to placement of a successful intravenous catheter is variable but is generally completed within one hour. This is an estimated timeframe.
Time to successful placement of IVWithin one hourThe time to placement of a successful intravenous catheter is variable but is generally completed within one hour. This is an estimated timeframe.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026