Skip to content

FAME II - Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Plus Optimal Medical Treatment (OMT) Verses OMT

Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plus Optimal Medical Treatment Versus Optimal Medical Treatment Alone in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01132495
Enrollment
1170
Registered
2010-05-28
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2019-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Stable angina, angina pectoris, PCI, FAME, FAME II, FFR, Fractional Flow Reserve, Pressure wire

Brief summary

The overall purpose of the FAME II trial is to compare the clinical outcomes, safety and cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI plus optimal medical treatment (OMT) versus OMT alone in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Detailed description

Prospective, multi-center, multi-national, multi-continental, randomized clinical trial.

Interventions

OTHERStenting plus OMT

FFR guided PCI, plus OMT

OTHEROMT

OMT alone

OTHERStandard of care

FFR \> 0.80; treatment according to local practice

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with * stable angina or, * stabilized angina pectoris or, * atypical chest pain or no chest pain but with documented silent ischemia 2. at least one stenosis is present of at least 50% in one major native epicardial coronary artery and supplying viable myocardium 3. Eligible for PCI 4. Signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients in whom the preferred treatment is CABG 2. Patients with left main coronary artery disease requiring revascularization 3. Patients with a recent STEMI or Non-STEMI 4. Prior CABG 5. Contra-indication to dual antiplatelet therapy 6. LVEF \< 30% 7. Severe LV hypertrophy 8. Planned need for concomitant cardiac surgery 9. Extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries precluding FFR measurements 10. A life expectancy of less than 2 years 11. Age under 21

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)24 MonthMACE: A composite of all cause death, documented MI, unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall MACE3 yearsIndividual components of the primary end point, cardiac death, and nonurgent revascularization

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Serbia, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized to Cohort A if at least one stenoses had an FFR value of \<=0.80. Participants with FFR \>0.80 were treated according to local practice and were randomized to study follow-up / no study follow-up in Cohort B. Therefore, participants are either in cohort A or cohort B (not both).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMT
PCI plus optimal medical treatment Stenting plus OMT: FFR guided PCI, plus OMT
447
Cohort A - OMT Alone
Optimal medical treatment alone Standard of care: OMT alone
441
Cohort B - Follow-up
Observation with treatment based on physician preference
166
Cohort B - No Follow-up Re-consented
Observation with treatment based on physician preference, initially randomized to no follow-up, re-consented per safety data.
116
Total1,170

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyVarious reasons40382012

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort A - PCI Plus OMTCohort A - OMT AloneCohort B - Follow-upCohort B - No Follow-up Re-consentedTotal
Age, Continuous63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
64.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
93 Participants103 Participants53 Participants37 Participants286 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
354 Participants338 Participants113 Participants79 Participants884 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
137 / 447324 / 44155 / 16628 / 116

Outcome results

Primary

Major Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)

MACE: A composite of all cause death, documented MI, unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization.

Time frame: 24 Month

Population: The primary outcome analysis was designed for Cohort A only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Death or Myocardial Infarction9.4 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Death3.6 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Myocardial Infarction6.7 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Cerebrovascular Event2.2 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Non Urgent Revascularization6.7 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Other Serious Adverse Event (SAE)0.2 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Unplanned Hospitalizations with urgent revasc1.8 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - OMT AloneMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Other Serious Adverse Event (SAE)0.7 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - OMT AloneMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Non Urgent Revascularization32.7 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - OMT AloneMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Myocardial Infarction9.3 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - OMT AloneMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Unplanned Hospitalizations with urgent revasc13.4 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - OMT AloneMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Death3.9 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - OMT AloneMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Cerebrovascular Event1.4 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Cohort A - OMT AloneMajor Adverse Cardiac Event Rate (MACE)Death or Myocardial Infarction12.2 percentage of subjects with SAEs
Secondary

Overall MACE

Individual components of the primary end point, cardiac death, and nonurgent revascularization

Time frame: 3 years

Population: For registry cohort B, 50% of the patients with an FFR \>0.80 across all lesions were followed up in a registry, and therefore, cohort B group for 'No Follow-up Re-consented' arm had no follow-up result and was not included in the endpoint analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTOverall MACENonurgent revascularization6.3 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTOverall MACEOverall MACE10.1 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTOverall MACEDeath from any cause2.7 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTOverall MACEMyocardial infarction6.3 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTOverall MACEUrgent revascularization4.3 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTOverall MACEAny revascularization10.3 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - PCI Plus OMTOverall MACECardiac death1.1 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - OMT AloneOverall MACEDeath from any cause3.6 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - OMT AloneOverall MACEMyocardial infarction7.7 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - OMT AloneOverall MACENonurgent revascularization30.2 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - OMT AloneOverall MACEUrgent revascularization17.2 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - OMT AloneOverall MACECardiac death1.1 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - OMT AloneOverall MACEOverall MACE22 percentage of subjects
Cohort A - OMT AloneOverall MACEAny revascularization44.2 percentage of subjects
Cohort B: Registry CohortOverall MACEUrgent revascularization6.6 percentage of subjects
Cohort B: Registry CohortOverall MACEDeath from any cause3.0 percentage of subjects
Cohort B: Registry CohortOverall MACEAny revascularization14.5 percentage of subjects
Cohort B: Registry CohortOverall MACEOverall MACE12.7 percentage of subjects
Cohort B: Registry CohortOverall MACEMyocardial infarction6.6 percentage of subjects
Cohort B: Registry CohortOverall MACENonurgent revascularization9.0 percentage of subjects
Cohort B: Registry CohortOverall MACECardiac death1.8 percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026