Skip to content

Patient and Provider Interventions for Managing Osteoarthritis in Primary Care

Patient and Provider Interventions for Managing Osteoarthritis in Primary Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01130740
Enrollment
300
Registered
2010-05-26
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2015-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Exercise, Diet, Coping Skills, Education, Medical

Brief summary

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common chronic conditions and a leading cause of disability among veterans. Many veterans with OA have significant pain and functional limitations, even though they receive some medical care for their OA. Efforts are needed to help veterans to improve OA-related outcomes. This study will examine a comprehensive approach to helping veterans manage their OA-related symptoms, in the context of a VA clinical setting. The study examines an intervention aimed at helping veterans with behaviors that are known to improve OA-related pain and function (such as exercise, weight management, and coping with pain), as well as helping providers to implement evidence-based recommendations for clinical care. The intervention is relatively low cost and easy to disseminate, with the patient component being telephone based. Therefore, if effective, this intervention could be implemented widely across the VA healthcare system.

Detailed description

Evidence-based guidelines emphasize that adequate management of osteoarthritis (OA) requires a combination of both medical and behavioral modalities. However, many of the recommended guidelines are not regularly incorporated into clinical practice, and the recommended behavioral strategies (e.g. exercise and weight management) are not practiced by most patients. The objective of this study is examine the effectiveness of a combined intervention for patients (involving exercise, weight management, and cognitive behavioral pain management) and providers (involving provision of patient-specific recommendations for care, based on evidence-based guidelines) for improving OA-related outcomes in a real-world VA clinical setting. To our knowledge this is will be the first study to intervene at a both the patient and provider levels for managing OA. This will be a randomized controlled trial of n=300 patients with symptomatic knee or hip OA, with equal assignment to 2 study arms: 1) Patient and Provider Intervention for OA and 2.) Usual Care Control. We will randomize 30 primary care providers at the Durham VAMC and affiliated community based outpatient clinics to either intervention or control groups. We will then enroll 10 patients from each provider (5 White, 5 Non-White). The patient component of the intervention will be a twelve-month program that includes the following elements: written educational materials (focused on exercise, weight management, and cognitive behavioral pain management), an exercise video tailored for patients with lower extremity OA, and telephone calls by a counselor to support behavior change. The provider component of the intervention will involve giving information on patients' OA symptoms and treatment, as well as patient-specific evidence-based recommendations for care. Providers will have access to this information, as well as facilitated referrals for patient-specific treatment recommendations (e.g. physical therapy, orthopedics), at the point of clinical care, via electronic medical records. The primary time point for outcome assessment will be at 12-months. We will also assess a limited set of outcomes via telephone at 6-months. The primary outcome will be the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcomes will include objective physical function (Short Physical Performance Test) and depressive symptoms (PHQ-8). The main study analyses will compare outcomes between the intervention and control groups. We will also assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOsteoarthritis Intervention

Primary care providers receive patient-specific osteoarthritis information and treatment recommendations two times (0 and 6 months); patients receive a 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls focusing on exercise, weight management, and cognitive behavioral pain management.

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* radiographic evidence of hip OA and / or radiographic of or meets clinical criteria for knee OA * current joint symptoms * BMI \>=25 * physically inactive

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, or other systemic rheumatic disease * Hospitalized for a stroke, myocardial infarction or coronary artery revascularization in the past 3 months * Active diagnosis of psychosis or serious personality disorder * On waiting list for / planning arthroplasty * Severely impaired hearing or speech (patients must be able to respond to phone calls) * Unable to speak English * No access to a telephone * Participating in another OA intervention or other lifestyle change study * Dementia or other memory loss condition * Current, uncontrolled substance abuse disorder * Motor neuron diseases, Parkinson's Disease, multiple sclerosis * Quadriplegic or paraplegic * Serious / terminal illness as indicated by referral to hospice or palliative care * Other self-reported health problem that would prohibit participation in the study * Nursing home resident * Other health conditions or personal issues judged by a study team member or primary care physician to make the patient inappropriate for the study * Female participants: pregnant or planning to become pregnant * Metastatic Cancer * History of gout in knee or hip * Total joint replacement (knee or hip) surgery, other knee or hip surgery, meniscus tear (verified by MRI), or ACL tear in the past 6 months * Have not seen their VA-assigned primary health care provider for more than a year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)12-monthsSelf-report measure of lower extremity pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and function (17 items) in the past two weeks. All items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from none (0) to severe / extreme (4), for a total of range of 0-96. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms and poorer function. The Mixed Models Analysis described below utilizes a common baseline mean rather than means for the individual arms. This common baseline mean is presented here, and the raw baseline measures per group are presented in the baseline information section.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short Physical Performance Test Protocol12-monthsThis is a series of 5 tests covering the domains of balance (3 tests), gait speed (8 foot walk) and time to rise from a chair and return to the seated position five times. The total score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). The Mixed Models Analysis described below utilizes a common baseline mean rather than means for the individual arms. This common baseline mean is presented here, and the raw baseline measures per group are presented in the baseline information section.
PHQ-812-monthsThis is an 8-item self-report scale, all items are rated on a score of 0-3, for a total range of 0-24. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. The Mixed Models Analysis described below utilizes a common baseline mean rather than means for the individual arms. This common baseline mean is presented here, and the raw baseline measures per group are presented in the baseline information section.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Primary care providers in the Durham VA Ambulatory Care Service and their patients were recrutied from this study. Recruitment began on August 4, 2011 and was completed on December 30, 2012.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care
Participants received no intervention durnig the study period but continued with any other usual care for osteoarthritis.
149
Osteoarthritis Intervention
Osteoarthritis Intervention - Primary care providers receive patient-specific osteoarthritis information and treatment recommendations approximately one week prior to the patient's first post-enrollment routine appointment with PCP; patients receive a 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls focusing on exercise, weight management, and cognitive behavioral pain management. Osteoarthritis Intervention: Primary care providers receive patient-specific osteoarthritis information and treatment recommendations two times (0 and 6 months); patients receive a 12-month intervention consisting of monthly phone calls focusing on exercise, weight management, and cognitive behavioral pain management.
151
Total300

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual CareOsteoarthritis InterventionTotal
Age, Continuous61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8)6.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.13
7.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.57
6.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.36
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
65 Participants69 Participants134 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
8 Participants12 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
73 Participants67 Participants140 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants20 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
141 Participants131 Participants272 Participants
Short Performance Physical Test8.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.48
8.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.63
8.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)47.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4
48.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.6
48.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 14944 / 151
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 14925 / 151

Outcome results

Primary

Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

Self-report measure of lower extremity pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and function (17 items) in the past two weeks. All items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from none (0) to severe / extreme (4), for a total of range of 0-96. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms and poorer function. The Mixed Models Analysis described below utilizes a common baseline mean rather than means for the individual arms. This common baseline mean is presented here, and the raw baseline measures per group are presented in the baseline information section.

Time frame: 12-months

Population: All enrolled participants were analyzed, on an intent to treat basis. One enrolled participants in the Usual Care grouped changed clinical care to an enrolled OA Intervention provider after randomization, so that participant was analyzed with the OA intervention group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareWestern Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)Common Baseline48.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
Usual CareWestern Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)6-Month43.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Usual CareWestern Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)12-Month48.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.38
Osteoarthritis InterventionWestern Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)6-Month41.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.47
Osteoarthritis InterventionWestern Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)Common Baseline48.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
Osteoarthritis InterventionWestern Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)12-Month44.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
Comparison: This is a comparison of 6-month outcomes between the two study groups. (Primary comparison is for 12 months.)p-value: 0.158Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: This is the 12-month comparison between the 2 study groups, which is the primary study analysis.p-value: 0.008Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

PHQ-8

This is an 8-item self-report scale, all items are rated on a score of 0-3, for a total range of 0-24. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. The Mixed Models Analysis described below utilizes a common baseline mean rather than means for the individual arms. This common baseline mean is presented here, and the raw baseline measures per group are presented in the baseline information section.

Time frame: 12-months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CarePHQ-8Common Baseline6.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Usual CarePHQ-812 Months6.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Osteoarthritis InterventionPHQ-8Common Baseline6.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Osteoarthritis InterventionPHQ-812 Months6.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
p-value: 0.177Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Short Physical Performance Test Protocol

This is a series of 5 tests covering the domains of balance (3 tests), gait speed (8 foot walk) and time to rise from a chair and return to the seated position five times. The total score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). The Mixed Models Analysis described below utilizes a common baseline mean rather than means for the individual arms. This common baseline mean is presented here, and the raw baseline measures per group are presented in the baseline information section.

Time frame: 12-months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareShort Physical Performance Test ProtocolCommon Baseline8.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.149
Usual CareShort Physical Performance Test Protocol12 Months7.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.233
Osteoarthritis InterventionShort Physical Performance Test ProtocolCommon Baseline8.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.149
Osteoarthritis InterventionShort Physical Performance Test Protocol12 Months7.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.237
Comparison: This is the between-group 12-month comparison.p-value: 0.274Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026