Skip to content

Comparison of Nexium Versus Secretol in the Healing and Controlling of Symptoms in GERD Patients With Severe EE.

Comparison of Nexium Versus Secretol in the Healing and Controlling of Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(GERD)Patients With Severe Erosive Esophagitis(EE).

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01129713
Enrollment
40
Registered
2010-05-25
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2014-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Heartburn, Indigestion

Keywords

GERD, Acid Reflux, Heartburn, Regurgitation, Indigestion

Brief summary

To compare the complete healing of erosive esophagitis(EE) after 3 weeks of treatment with Secretol 80/80 versus Nexium 40 mg daily.

Detailed description

We hypothesize that Secretol 80/80 daily will demonstrate better efficacy than Nexium 40 mg daily in healing erosive esophagitis(EE)and controlling gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)related symptoms after 3 weeks of treatment.In addition, Secretol 80/80 daily will have a faster effect on the aforementioned clinical parameters but a similar safety profile.

Interventions

DRUGSecretol

Comparing 80/80 once daily to Nexium once daily in healing erosive esophagitis.

DRUGNexium

Comparing 40 mg Nexium once daily to 80/80 Secretol once daily in healing erosive esophagitis.

Sponsors

Southern Arizona VA Health Care System
CollaboratorFED
Effexus Pharmaceutical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or Female * Ages 18-75 * EE Los Angeles grades C or D * Heartburn and/or regurgitation at least 3 times a week during the 7 day run- in period prior to randomization. * Able to read, understand, and complete study questionnaires and record * Able to understand the study procedures and sign informed consent * Able to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with Barrett's esophagus, non-erosive reflux disease,EE grades A or B, or peptic stricture on endoscopy * Subjects with previous upper gastrointestinal surgery * Subjects with clinically significant underlying comorbidity * Helicobacter pylori positive * Clinically significant GI bleed within the last 3 months * Esophagitis not related to acid reflux * Bleeding disorder * Zollinger-Ellison, achalasia,esophageal varices, duodenal/gastric ulcer, upper gastrointestinal malignancy * Women pregnant or lactating * History of allergic reaction to any Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) * Patients can't be treated concurrently with warfarin or other anticoagulants,salicylates,steroids,NSAIDS \> 3 times/week * Any medication dependant on gastric acid for optimal absorption

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary objective is to evaluate the relationship between healing and study drug allotment.3 weeks of treatmentThe primary objective is to evaluate the relationship between healing and study drug allotment. The variables to be used are erosive esophagitis healing status after 3 weeks of treatment as assessed by EGD (upper endoscopy) comparing to base line EGD.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactRonnie Fass, MD
ronnie.fass@va.gov520-792-1450
Backup ContactMarcia R. Willis, BS,CCRC
marcia.willis@va.gov520-792-1450

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026