Skip to content

Gene Transfer for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, X-linked (SCID-X1) Using a Self-inactivating (SIN) Gammaretroviral Vector

Multi-site Phase I/II Trial Evaluating the Treatment of SCID-X1 Patients With Retrovirus-mediated Gene Transfer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01129544
Enrollment
8
Registered
2010-05-24
Start date
2010-04-01
Completion date
2023-03-01
Last updated
2026-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Keywords

Severe combined immunodeficiency, SCID, XSCID, SCID-X1

Brief summary

Researchers are working on ways to treat SCID patients who don't have a matched brother or sister. One of the goals is to avoid the problems that happen with stem cell transplant from parents and unrelated people, such as repeat transplants, incomplete cure of the immune system, exposure to chemotherapy, and graft versus host disease. The idea behind gene transfer is to replace the broken gene by putting a piece of genetic material (DNA) that has the normal gene into the child's cells. Gene transfer can only be done if we know which gene is missing or broken in the patient. For SCID-X1, gene transfer has been done in the laboratory and in two previous clinical trials by inserting the normal gene into stem cells from bone marrow. The bone marrow is the "factory" inside the bones that creates blood and immune cells. So fixing the gene in the bone marrow stem cells should fix the immune problem, without giving chemotherapy and without risk of graft versus host disease, because the child's own cells are used, rather than another person's. Out of the 20 subjects enrolled in the two previous trials, 18 are alive with better immune systems after gene transfer. Two of the surviving subjects received gene corrected cells over 10 years ago. Gene transfer is still research for two reasons. One is that not enough children have been studied to tell if the procedure is consistently successful. Of the 20 children enrolled in the previous two trials, one child did not have correction of the immune system, and died of complications after undergoing stem cell transplant. The second important reason why gene transfer is research is that we are still learning about the side effects of gene transfer and how to do gene transfer safely. In the last two trials, 5 children have experienced a serious side effect. These children developed leukemia related to the gene transfer itself. Leukemia is a cancer of the white blood cells, a condition where a few white blood cells grow out of control. Of these children, 4 of the 5 have received chemotherapy (medication to treat cancer) and are currently in remission (no leukemia can be found by sensitive testing), whereas one died of gene transfer-related leukemia.

Detailed description

Severe combined immunodeficiencies (SCID) are a heterogeneous group of inherited disorders characterized by a profound reduction or absence of T lymphocyte function. They arise from a variety of molecular defects which affect lymphocyte development and function. The most common form of SCID is an X-linked form (SCID-X1) which accounts for 40-50% of all cases. SCID-X1 is caused by defects in the common cytokine receptor chain, which was originally identified as a component of the high affinity interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2RG), but is now known to be an essential component of the IL-4, -7, -9 -15, and -21 cytokine receptor complexes. Classic SCID-X1 has an extremely poor prognosis without treatment. Death usually occurs in the first year of life from infectious complications unless definitive treatment can be administered. Until the recent advent of somatic gene therapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offered the only curative option for patients with any form of SCID. If a genotypically matched sibling donor is available, HSCT is a highly successful procedure. However a genotypically matched family donor is only available for approximately 30% of patients. For the remaining individuals, alternative donor transplants, principally from matched unrelated or haploidentical parental donors have been performed. These approaches are still problematic with toxicity from ablative therapy, graft-versus-host disease and incomplete lymphoid reconstitution. Recent gene transfer trials have documented the efficacy of gene transfer in this disease, albeit with toxicity related to insertional mutagenesis. A new generation of self-inactivating (SIN) vectors has been developed which lack all enhancer-promoter elements of the LTR U3 region and are also devoid of all gammaretroviral coding regions. A SIN vector expressing the IL-2RG gene, pSRS11.EFS.IL2RG.pre\* has been developed and has shown a reduction in mutagenic potential compared to LTR configuration in non-clinical studies. The current study is a phase I/II trial of somatic gene therapy for patients with SCID-X1.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALGene transfer

Three procedures: 1) Bone marrow harvest from the patient's posterior iliac crests. 2.) Chemotherapy conditioning with Busulfan 3)One time infusion of patient's transduced bone marrow cells.

Sponsors

David Williams
Lead SponsorOTHER
Boston Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, Los Angeles
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of SCID-X1 based on immunophenotype (\<200 CD3+ autologous T cells, and confirmed by DNA sequencing) AND 2. Lack an HLA identical (A, B, C, DR, DQ) related donor AND either one of the following: 1\. Patients in good clinical condition who do not have a readily available HLA identical (A,B,C,DR,DQ) unrelated donor (readily available defined as: a donor confirmed within 6 weeks of searching, with ability to transplant within 3 months of diagnosis). 2\. Patients with an active, therapy-resistant infection or other medical conditions that significantly increase the risk of allogeneic transplant. Examples of "therapy-resistant infections that significantly increase the risk of allogeneic transplant" include but are not limited to: 1. interstitial pneumonia due to adenovirus or parainfluenzae virus. 2. protracted diarrhea requiring total parenteral nutrition. 3. disseminated BCG infection. 4. virus-induced lymphoproliferative disease. 5. any active opportunistic infection (eg, due to Pneumocystis jiroveci, cytomegalovirus,cryptosporidium) that does not improve on medical management. 6. active and progressive pulmonary disease requiring mechanic ventilation. Inclusion of patients with disease-related organ dysfunction is justified by the known poor outcome with standard treatment and the potential life-saving nature of the treatment proposed. Patients who are on high-dose steroids or other immunosuppressive agents will also be considered eligible, because use of these drugs is common in patients with SCID and maternal T cell engraftment or who present with severe interstitial lung disease. Use of immunosuppressive drugs does not affect efficacy of hematopoietic cell transplantation, and therefore should not affect efficacy of gene transfer.

Exclusion criteria

1. No available molecular diagnosis confirming SCID-X1. 2. Patients who have an available HLA-identical related donor. 3. Diagnosis of active malignant disease other than EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disease 4. Patients with evidence of infection with HIV-1 5. Previous gene transfer 6. Major (life-threatening) congenital anomalies. Examples of "major (life-threatening) congenital anomalies" include, but are not limited to: unrepaired cyanotic heart disease, hypoplastic lungs, anencephaly or other major CNS malformations, other severe non-repairable malformations of the gastrointestinal or genitourinary tracts that significantly impair organ function. 7. Other conditions which in the opinion of the P.I. or co-investigators, contra-indicate collection and/or infusion of transduced cells or indicate patient's inability to follow the protocol. These may include for example clinical ineligibility to receive anesthesia, severe deterioration of clinical condition of the patient after collection of bone marrow but before infusion of transduced cells, or documented refusal or inability of the family to return for scheduled visits. There may be other unforeseen rare circumstances that would result in exclusion of the patient, such as sudden loss of legal guardianship. Although the presentation of the disease may be variable in type, the severity of the immunodeficiency is uniform. The gene transfer protocol will be instituted in the place of haploidentical transplant for those patients who do not have a matched family donor or in whom an unrelated donor transplant is not indicated for the reasons specified above. Apart from the gene transfer protocol, the patients will not undergo additional procedures that would not form part of an equivalent haploidentical transplantation regimen, and will not receive conditioning chemotherapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CD3 Cell Count Post Infusion6 Months Post Gene TransferImmunological reconstitution defined as absolute CD3 cells of \>300/μl and PHA stimulation index \>15 at 6 months post infusion
Incidence of Life Threatening Adverse Reactions Related to the Gene Therapy Procedure4.5-12 years post infusion of the gene therapy productFollow up time for each of the 8 enrolled patients is as follows: Patient #1 -12 yrs, Patient#2 -11 yrs, Patient #6- 9 yrs, Patient #7- 8 yrs, Patient #8 - 4.5 yrs. Patient #3 \& #5 failed primary endpoint and had allo transplant, Patient #4 retreated with Gene therapy and is 6 years post 2nd infusion.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJennifer Whangbo, MD

Boston Children's Hospital

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 8

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 22, 2026