Skip to content

Safety Extension Study Of Tanezumab When Administered By Subcutaneous Injection To Patients With Osteoarthritis

A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, LONG TERM STUDY OF THE SAFETY OF THE SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01127893
Enrollment
1
Registered
2010-05-21
Start date
2010-06-15
Completion date
2010-09-29
Last updated
2021-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Musculoskeletal Diseases, Joint Diseases, Arthritis, Rheumatic Diseases

Brief summary

An evaluation of the long term safety of tanezumab when administered by subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks for up to 64 weeks

Detailed description

This study was terminated on 29 September 2010 following a US FDA clinical hold for tanezumab osteoarthritis clinical studies which halted dosing and enrollment of patients on 23 June 2010 for potential safety issues.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALTanezumab

Tanezumab 10 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks for up to 7 injections

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must have participated in specific Phase 3 parent study

Exclusion criteria

* Failed screening for parent study, pregnant women, lactating mothers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug, up to early termination (Day 107) that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)Laboratory examination included blood chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Reported results were to include abnormal laboratory findings without regard to baseline abnormality.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)Following parameters were analyzed for ECG abnormality: PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB), QT interval corrected using Fredericia's formula (QTcF), RR interval and heart rate (HR).
Number of Participants With Neurologic Examination AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)Neurologic examination assessed the strength of groups of muscles of the head and neck, upper limbs and lower limbs, deep tendon reflexes and sensation (tactile, vibration, joint position sense and pin prick) of index fingers and great toes.
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Number of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsBaseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)Injection site reactions included: erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection has been administered.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Point in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisBaseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways your OA in your joint affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) Very Good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) Good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) Fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) Poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) Very Poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10; where higher scores indicated more stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in movement of the index joint.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis. WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher score indicated worse response.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64Participants answered: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64Participants answered: How much pain have you had when going up or down stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Analgesic Medication for Osteoarthritis TreatmentBaseline up to Day 107 (Early Termination)Permissible concomitant analgesic medications included Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (for example, hyaluronan) and were to be prescribed as per investigator's discretion.
Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage for Osteoarthritis TreatmentBaseline up to Week 64Permissible concomitant analgesic medications included Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (for example, hyaluronan) and were to be prescribed as per investigator's discretion.
Tanezumab Plasma ConcentrationPre-dose on Week 8, 24, 40; Week 56, 64
Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationPre-dose on Week 8, 24, 40; Week 56, 64Serum samples were analyzed for determining total NGF concentration. Total NGF was analyzed using a validated, sensitive, and specific immune-affinity enrichment liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric (IA/LC/MS/MS) method.
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of EfficacyBaseline up to Week 64
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis (OA) in your knee affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) Very Good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) Good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) Fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) Poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) Very Poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseBaseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64OMERACT-OARSI response: \>=50 percent (%) improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=2 units at Week of interest in WOMAC pain or physical function subscale, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: \>=20% improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=1 unit at Week of interest in 1) WOMAC pain subscale, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected). WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score: 0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).
Percentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale ScoreBaseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale ScoreBaseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants who had received tanezumab 2.5 milligram(mg) subcutaneously(SC) every 8 weeks, 5 mg SC every 8 weeks or 10 mg SC or intravenously every 8 weeks in parent Study A4091027 (NCT01089725) were to be assigned to same dose group and who received placebo in same parent study, were to be randomized to either tanezumab 2.5, 5 or 10 mg SC every 8 weeks in this study.

Pre-assignment details

Due to the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) imposed clinical hold, the study was terminated prematurely. Only 1 participant was enrolled and treated with tanezumab 2.5 mg treatment group and other planned treatments, tanezumab 5 or 10 mg, were not administered.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tanezumab 2.5 mg
Participants who had previously received tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 mg subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks in parent Study A4091027 (NCT01089725), received single dose of tanezumab 2.5 mg subcutaneous injection on Day 1.
1
Total1

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyStudy Termination by the Sponsor1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTanezumab 2.5 mg
Age, Continuous63 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug, up to early termination (Day 107) that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Time frame: Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, all planned analyses were not performed; data reported here is for baseline up to early termination (Day 107).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs0 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)

Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Time frame: Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, all planned analyses were not performed; data reported here is for baseline up to early termination (Day 107).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

Following parameters were analyzed for ECG abnormality: PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB), QT interval corrected using Fredericia's formula (QTcF), RR interval and heart rate (HR).

Time frame: Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, all planned analyses were not performed; data reported here is for baseline up to early termination (Day 107).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities

Laboratory examination included blood chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Reported results were to include abnormal laboratory findings without regard to baseline abnormality.

Time frame: Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, all planned analyses were not performed; data reported here is for baseline up to early termination (Day 107).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions

Injection site reactions included: erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection has been administered.

Time frame: Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, all planned analyses were not performed; data reported here is for baseline up to early termination (Day 107).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Injection Site Reactions0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Neurologic Examination Abnormalities

Neurologic examination assessed the strength of groups of muscles of the head and neck, upper limbs and lower limbs, deep tendon reflexes and sensation (tactile, vibration, joint position sense and pin prick) of index fingers and great toes.

Time frame: Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, all planned analyses were not performed; data reported here is for baseline up to early termination (Day 107).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Neurologic Examination Abnormalities0 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64

PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis (OA) in your knee affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) Very Good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) Good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) Fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) Poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) Very Poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, only 1 participant was enrolled and the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, planned analyses for Week 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64 were not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline3.0 units on a scale
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Change at Week 40.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis. WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher score indicated worse response.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, only 1 participant was enrolled and the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, planned analyses for Week 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64 were not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline6.2 units on a scale
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Change at Week 4-0.1 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, only 1 participant was enrolled and the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, planned analyses for Week 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64 were not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline5.8 units on a scale
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Change at Week 40.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64

The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, only 1 participant was enrolled and the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, planned analyses for Week 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64 were not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline6.2 units on a scale
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Change at Week 4-0.1 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64

The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10; where higher scores indicated more stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in movement of the index joint.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, only 1 participant was enrolled and the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, planned analyses for Week 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64 were not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline6.5 units on a scale
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Change at Week 40.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64

Participants answered: How much pain have you had when going up or down stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, only 1 participant was enrolled and the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, planned analyses for Week 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64 were not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Change at Week 40.0 units on a scale
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline7.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64

Participants answered: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, only 1 participant was enrolled and the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, planned analyses for Week 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64 were not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Baseline5.0 units on a scale
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64Change at Week 40.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage for Osteoarthritis Treatment

Permissible concomitant analgesic medications included Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (for example, hyaluronan) and were to be prescribed as per investigator's discretion.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 64

Population: Data not analyzed since no participant received concomitant analgesic medication.

Secondary

Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration

Serum samples were analyzed for determining total NGF concentration. Total NGF was analyzed using a validated, sensitive, and specific immune-affinity enrichment liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric (IA/LC/MS/MS) method.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Week 8, 24, 40; Week 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, the study was terminated prematurely (Day 107). Consequently, planned analyses for Week 24, 40, 56 and 64 were not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationWeek 81138 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum ConcentrationEarly Termination (Day 107)208.9 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Analgesic Medication for Osteoarthritis Treatment

Permissible concomitant analgesic medications included Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (for example, hyaluronan) and were to be prescribed as per investigator's discretion.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 107 (Early Termination)

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, all planned analyses were not performed; data reported here is for baseline up to early termination (Day 107).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants Who Received Concomitant Analgesic Medication for Osteoarthritis Treatment0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

Population: Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, only 1 participant was enrolled and the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, planned efficacy analysis was not performed.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

Population: Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, only 1 participant was enrolled and the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, planned efficacy analysis was not performed.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Point in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis

PGA: Participants answered the following question: Considering all the ways your OA in your joint affects you, how are you doing today? Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) Very Good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) Good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) Fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) Poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) Very Poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

Population: Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, only 1 participant was enrolled and the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, planned efficacy analysis was not performed.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response

OMERACT-OARSI response: \>=50 percent (%) improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=2 units at Week of interest in WOMAC pain or physical function subscale, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: \>=20% improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of \>=1 unit at Week of interest in 1) WOMAC pain subscale, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected). WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score: 0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

Population: Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, only 1 participant was enrolled and the study was terminated prematurely. Consequently, planned efficacy analysis was not performed.

Secondary

Tanezumab Plasma Concentration

Time frame: Pre-dose on Week 8, 24, 40; Week 56, 64

Population: ITT analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Due to the US FDA imposed clinical hold, the study was terminated prematurely (Day 107). Consequently, planned analyses for Week 24, 40, 56 and 64 were not performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgTanezumab Plasma ConcentrationWeek 863.7 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgTanezumab Plasma ConcentrationEarly Termination (Day 107)NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Secondary

Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 64

Population: Data not analyzed since no participant discontinued the study due to lack of efficacy.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026