Skip to content

Efficacy Study for the Symptomatic Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis With a 1 Year Safety Extension

A Phase III, Comparative Study for the Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine 20 mg Versus Cetirizine 10 mg and Placebo in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis During 4 Weeks, Followed by a Long-term Safety Extension With Bilastine 20 mg

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01127620
Enrollment
650
Registered
2010-05-21
Start date
2004-05-31
Completion date
2006-11-30
Last updated
2012-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perennial Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis, Persistent allergic rhinitis, Hay fever, Allergic Rhinitis, Sneezing, Nasal congestion, Rhinorrhea, Nasal itching, Ocular itching, Ocular tearing, Antihistamine

Brief summary

Double-blind phase: The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bilastine 20 mg, compared to Cetirizine and placebo for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. Open-label Phase: The objective of this extension was to evaluate the long-term safety of Bilastine 20 mg during one year in the symptomatic treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

Detailed description

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, international, multicenter study followed by an open label extension. Duration of the double-blind period was 28 days and the duration of the open label period was 12 additional months. The primary efficacy variable of the double-blind period was the area under curve (AUC) of total symptoms scale (TSS) from baseline (defined as the mean of 6 last points of the patients' diary before randomization) to D28 visit according to the patient's assessment on reflective symptoms. 650 patients were included in the study and 614 completed the double-blind phase. Out of the 614 patients who completed the double blind period, a total of 513 patients started the open label period with Bilastine 20 mg (83.6%)

Interventions

20 mg encapsulated tablets

DRUGCetirizine

10 mg encapsulated tablets

DRUGPlacebo

encapsulated tablets

Sponsors

Faes Farma, S.A.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of either sex aged from 12 to 70 years of age * Patients with a documented clinical history of PAR for at least 2 years prior to the study inclusion * Positive skin prick test for at least one of the following perennial allergens (house-dust mites, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus or D. farinae, animal danders, dogs or cats, molds, etc.) * Patients had to have a sum in the previous 6 assessments of the reflective nasal symptoms score equal to or greater than 30 (≥30 over 72). Additionally, at the time of randomization patients had to have positive symptomatology in instantaneous nasal symptoms equal or greater than 5 (≥5 over 12). * Women of childbearing potential had to have a negative pregnancy test and had to use an effective contraceptive method. * Provision of written informed consent to participate and willing to attend the required visits scheduled in the protocol * The criteria to continue with the open label period included previous participation in the double blind period, eligibility for a long-term symptomatic treatment according to the investigator assessment and patient willingness to follow the treatment for one year.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have non-allergic rhinitis (vasomotor, infectious, drug-induced, etc.). * Negative skin prick test (as defined in point 6.1.1.). * Patients with nasal polyps or a significant deviation of the nasal septum as judged by the investigator as well as nasal intervention in the previous 6 months. * Any other nasal illness that can interfere with the aim of the study. * Patients who have acute or chronic sinusitis as judged by the investigator. * Patients who are also diagnosed with SAR (seasonal allergic rhinitis), and the inclusion and follow-up during the double-blind phase in this study is concurrent with the pollen season. * Immunotherapy (6 months): In case of patients under immunotherapy the treatment had to have started more than 6 months prior to the start of the study, the doses could not be modified during the study, and any doses could not be administered 24 hours before any study visit.. * Patients who are taking or have taken specified medications prior to randomisation in the study and have not complied with the specified washout period * Severe concomitant disease that could interfere with treatment response (hepatic, renal, cardiovascular), electrocardiographic abnormalities, arrhythmia, recent acute myocardial infarction or neoplastic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Double-blind phase: AUC of TSS throughout the study28 daysArea under curve (AUC) of total symptoms scale (TSS) from baseline (defined as the mean of 6 last points of the patients' diary before randomization) to D28 visit according to the patient's assessment on reflective symptoms.
Open-label phase: Long-term safety12 monthsEvaluation of the long-term safety of Bilastine 20 mg during one year in the symptomatic treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. The tolerability of the study drug was assessed by means of: Adverse events (comparing the profiles throughout the course of the study), ECGs on M3, M6, M9 and M12 visits and routine laboratory analyses (haematology and biochemistry) performed at M3, M6, M9 and M12 visits.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Nasal Symptoms Score (NSS)Day 14 and day 28Change in Nasal Symptoms Score (NSS) on symptoms scale on D14 and D28 visits versus D0 visit according to the patient and investigator's assessment (at the moment of the visits)
Change in Non Nasal Symptoms Score (NNSS)Day 14 and day 28Change in Non Nasal Symptoms Score (NNSS) on symptom scale on D14 and D28 visits versus D0 visit according to the patient and investigator's assessment (at the moment of the visits)
Change in individual nasal and non nasal symptomsDay 14 and day 28Change in each of the NSS or NNSS on symptoms scale on D14 and D28 visits versus D0 visit according to the patient and investigator's assessments (at the moment of the visits)
AUC of NSS, NNSS and each individual nasal andn non nasal symptom28 daysAUC of NSS, NNSS and each of the nasal and non nasal symptoms scores on symptoms scale from baseline to D28, according to the patient's assessment on reflective symptoms
AUC of NSS, NNSS and each individual symptom according to patient's instantaneous assessment28 daysAUC of NSS, NNSS and each of the nasal and non nasal symptoms scores on symptoms scale from baseline to D28, according to the patient's assessment on instantaneous symptoms. Time to maximum relief of symptoms
AUC of TSS since baseline to D28 according to the patient's assessment on instantaneous symptoms.28 days
Investigator's clinical global impression28 days
Quality of Life change from baseline28 days
Responders rate28 daysResponders were classified based on their total symptom score decrease to baseline: \<25%, 25%-50%, 50%-75%, \>75% and were described by treatment group with their percentage and 95% confidence interval.
Time to maximum response48 hoursTime to maximum response was described using Kaplan-Meier estimates and was compared (Log-rank test) between treatment groups.
Safety and tolerability28 daysThe tolerability of the study drug was assessed by means of: Adverse events (comparing the profiles throughout the course of the study, ECGs on D0 and D28 visits and routine laboratory analyses (haematology and biochemistry) performed at D0 and D28 visits.
Overall assessment of discomfortDay 14 and day 28Overall assessment of discomfort caused by allergic rhinitis using a visual analog scale (VAS) on D14 and D28 visits
Change in the TSS on D14 and D28 visits versus D0 visit according to the patient and investigator's assessments (at the moment of the visits)Day 14 and day 28

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026