Skip to content

A Study to Compare Two Medications With an Inactive Medication and Look at the Effect on a Person's Mental Ability

A Study to Compare the Cognitive Effect of Solifenacin 5mg Once-daily and Oxybutynin 5mg Twice-daily After Chronic Dosing Versus Placebo in Subjects 75 Years and Over With Mild Cognitive Impairment - A Double-blind, Randomized, Multi-center Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01126424
Acronym
SENIOR
Enrollment
26
Registered
2010-05-19
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2012-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cognition

Keywords

Anti-muscarinics, Anti-cholinergics, Cognition, Solifenacin

Brief summary

The purpose is to compare solifenacin and oxybutynin with an inactive tablet and assess any potential effects on mental ability.

Detailed description

All subjects will receive each intervention during the course of the study. Subjects will complete a 21-day washout period between treatment periods and following last treatment period.

Interventions

DRUGSolifenacin

tablet

DRUGOxybutynin

capsule

DRUGPlacebo

tablet

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The subject has mild cognitive impairment as determined by mini-mental state examination (MMSE) ≥ grade 24 * The subject conforms to the Stockholm criteria for mild cognitive impairment as assessed by the investigator * The subject has a body mass index (BMI) between 18.0 to 30.0 kg/m2 inclusive * The subject is available to complete the study

Exclusion criteria

* The subject has moderate or severe cognitive impairment as determined by MMSE criteria at screening, ≤ grade 23 * The subject has depression as determined by Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) short form ≥ 5 at screening * The subject has a history of urinary retention, severe gastrointestinal obstruction (including paralytic ileus or intestinal atony or toxic megacolon or severe ulcerative colitis), myasthenia gravis, uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma or shallow anterior chamber or deemed to be at risk for these conditions * The subject is undergoing hemodialysis or has severe renal impairment or moderate hepatic impairment and who are on treatment with a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, e.g. Ketoconazole * The subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus * The subject has a positive pre-study hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody or HIV result at time of screening * The subject has a history of drug and / or alcohol abuse at time of screening * The subject has an average weekly alcohol intake of greater than 21 units (male) or 14 units (female) within ≤ 3 months prior to screening (1 unit is 270cc of beer, 40cc of spirits or 125cc of wine) * The subject has a history of smoking more than 10 cigarettes (or the equivalent amount of tobacco) per day within ≤ 3 months prior to screening * The subject has a history of known or suspected hypersensitivity to solifenacin succinate, oxybutynin hydrochloride, other anti-cholinergics or lactose, to any component of the dosage form * The subject has taken any unstable doses of prescribed medication within ≤ 1 month prior to screening or over-the-counter medicine (including vitamins and herbal remedies) within 48 hours prior to the first study day, which in the opinion of the Investigator, will interfere with the study procedures or compromise safety * The subject is currently dosing with medication(s) intended to treat overactive bladder symptoms or has history of non-drug treatment intended to treat overactive bladder symptoms within ≤ 3 months prior to screening * The subject has any clinically significant abnormality following Investigator review of the physical examination * The subject has any clinically significant abnormality following the Investigator's review of the ECG * The subject has mobility impairment that precludes the assessment of postural stability * The subject has any clinically significant abnormal heart rate or blood pressure measurements, at the screening visit (dBP \> 90mmHg, sBP \> 160mmHg or HR \< 40bpm or \> 100bpm) * The subject has any clinically significant abnormality following Investigator's review of the biochemistry & hematology results which, in the opinion of the Investigator, contraindicates their participation * The subject has donated blood or plasma within ≤ 3 months prior to screening or more than 500ml or 1 unit of blood or plasma within ≤ 6 months prior to screening * The subject, may find it difficult to adhere to the provisions of treatment and observation specified in the protocol * The subject has participated in any clinical study within ≤ 3 months prior to screening * The subject has any clinical condition, diagnosis, symptomatology or ongoing investigation, which, contraindicates their participation * The subject is an employee of Astellas Pharma, Cognitive Drug Research, and any other third party related to the study site

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionAssessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) for solifenacin (6 hours) and oxybutynin (2 hours). Power of attention is calculated from the sum of three cognitive function speed tests: Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time and the Speed of Detections in Digit Vigilance task. A low score reflects a fast reaction time and a high intensity of concentration. A positive change from baseline reflects impairment compared to the baseline assessment.
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionAssessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.Cognitive effects were assessed using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time of maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. For continuity of attention, the number of correct responses (out of 50) for choice reaction time was added to the total number of targets correctly identified (out of 45) digit vigilance minus the number of false alarms (total score of -45 to 95). A high score reflects someone able to keep his/her mind on a single task for a prolonged period. A negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline.
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryAssessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) for solifenacin (6 hours) and oxybutynin (2 hours). Quality of working memory is calculated from the sum of two cognitive function sensitivity tests: Numeric Working Memory Sensitivity and Spatial Working Memory Sensitivity, and ranges from -2 to 2. A higher score reflects a good working memory and a negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to the baseline assessment.
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryAssessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time of maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Quality of episodic secondary memory is calculated from the sum of 4 tests: Immediate and delayed word recall, and word and picture recognition, and ranges from -200 to 400. A high score reflects a good ability to store, hold and retrieve information of an episodic nature (i.e. an event or a name) and a negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline.
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryAssessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Speed of Memory was calculated from the sum of 4 cognitive function speed tests: numeric and spatial working memory and word and picture recognition. A low score reflects that a person is able to recall a name, a face or any other item fast from the episodic secondary memory; a positive change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Postural Stability TestAssessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.The postural stability test measures the ability to stand upright without moving, and was assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Using apparatus modeled on the Wright Ataxia-meter, a cord from the meter is attached to the patient who is required to stand as still as possible with feet apart and eyes closed for 1 minute. The amount of sway is expressed as the total angular movement, summed regardless of sign, in the antero-posterior plane and calibrated in units of one-third degree of angle of sway. Wright (1971) described a range of 20-30 units as a normal range for adults with eyes wide open, increasing by 50 to 100% with eyes shut.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Solifenacin / Oxybutynin / Placebo
Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 5 mg solifenacin, 10 mg oxybutynin, placebo. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period.
3
Solifenacin / Placebo / Oxybutynin
Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 5 mg solifenacin, placebo, 10 mg oxybutynin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period.
4
Oxybutynin / Placebo / Solifenacin
Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 10 mg oxybutynin, placebo, 5 mg solifenacin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period.
5
Oxybutynin / Solifenacin / Placebo
Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 10 mg oxybutynin, 5 mg solifenacin, placebo. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period.
6
Placebo / Solifenacin / Oxybutynin
Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: placebo, 5 mg solifenacin, 10 mg oxybutynin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period.
4
Placebo / Oxybutynin / Solifenacin
Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: placebo, 10 mg oxybutynin, 5 mg solifenacin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period.
4
Total26

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event000010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject001310

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSolifenacin / Oxybutynin / PlaceboSolifenacin / Placebo / OxybutyninOxybutynin / Placebo / SolifenacinOxybutynin / Solifenacin / PlaceboPlacebo / Solifenacin / OxybutyninPlacebo / Oxybutynin / SolifenacinTotal
Age Continuous79.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
78.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
80.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
76.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
79.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
79.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
78.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
3 participants4 participants5 participants6 participants4 participants4 participants26 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants14 Participants
Stockholm criteria for mild cognitive impairment
No
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Stockholm criteria for mild cognitive impairment
Yes
3 participants4 participants5 participants6 participants4 participants4 participants26 participants
Total Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) Score1.0 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73
1.0 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.82
1.4 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.67
1.0 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63
1.3 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
1.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26
1.2 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.11
Total Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score27.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.58
28.3 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26
28.0 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
27.3 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75
26.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
27.3 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.06
27.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.39

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 2314 / 256 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 231 / 250 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of Attention

Cognitive effects were assessed using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time of maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. For continuity of attention, the number of correct responses (out of 50) for choice reaction time was added to the total number of targets correctly identified (out of 45) digit vigilance minus the number of false alarms (total score of -45 to 95). A high score reflects someone able to keep his/her mind on a single task for a prolonged period. A negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline.

Time frame: Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.

Population: The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]91.591 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2462
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionChange from Baseline at 2 hours0.545 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0637
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]91.228 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0454
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionChange from Baseline at 6 hours-0.318 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7143
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionChange from Baseline at 6 hours0.100 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7121
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]91.300 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5775
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]91.901 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.404
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionChange from Baseline at 2 hours0.150 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2653
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionChange from Baseline at 6 hours-0.045 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4566
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionChange from Baseline at 2 hours0.909 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6168
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]91.728 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6929
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of AttentionBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]91.364 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3409
Comparison: Comparison of solifenacin versus placebo change from Baseline at 6 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.568495% CI: [-2.293, 1.279]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of oxybutynin versus placebo change from Baseline at 2 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.234895% CI: [-2.122, 0.538]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of Attention

Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) for solifenacin (6 hours) and oxybutynin (2 hours). Power of attention is calculated from the sum of three cognitive function speed tests: Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time and the Speed of Detections in Digit Vigilance task. A low score reflects a fast reaction time and a high intensity of concentration. A positive change from baseline reflects impairment compared to the baseline assessment.

Time frame: Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.

Population: The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]1413.67 msecStandard Deviation 180.242
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionChange from Baseline at 2 hours-5.86 msecStandard Deviation 71.371
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]1421.80 msecStandard Deviation 191.303
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionChange from Baseline at 6 hours-14.80 msecStandard Deviation 87.918
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionChange from Baseline at 6 hours-0.74 msecStandard Deviation 62.65
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]1423.38 msecStandard Deviation 186.163
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]1405.41 msecStandard Deviation 182.929
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionChange from Baseline at 2 hours17.81 msecStandard Deviation 92.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionChange from Baseline at 6 hours11.77 msecStandard Deviation 93.655
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionChange from Baseline at 2 hours1.99 msecStandard Deviation 54.145
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]1393.98 msecStandard Deviation 189.128
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of AttentionBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]1401.21 msecStandard Deviation 177.194
Comparison: Comparison of solifenacin versus placebo change from Baseline at 6 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.377195% CI: [-68.58, 26.607]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of oxybutynin versus placebo change from Baseline at 2 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.448795% CI: [-28.854, 63.87]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary Memory

Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time of maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Quality of episodic secondary memory is calculated from the sum of 4 tests: Immediate and delayed word recall, and word and picture recognition, and ranges from -200 to 400. A high score reflects a good ability to store, hold and retrieve information of an episodic nature (i.e. an event or a name) and a negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline.

Time frame: Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.

Population: The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]111.893636 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 48.52511
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryChange from Baseline at 2 hours-3.788636 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.609118
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]101.363485 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.919411
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryChange from Baseline at 6 hours7.728182 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.836915
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryChange from Baseline at 6 hours-3.502000 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 48.822365
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]107.666333 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 55.168759
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]104.917167 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 50.380503
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryChange from Baseline at 2 hours-0.917833 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.198821
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryChange from Baseline at 6 hours1.589394 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.687431
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryChange from Baseline at 2 hours0.531515 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.576179
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]106.515000 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 45.147568
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary MemoryBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]110.000152 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 51.736947
Comparison: Comparison of solifenacin versus placebo change from Baseline at 6 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.631595% CI: [-14.858, 24.167]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of oxybutynin versus placebo change from Baseline at 2 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.86795% CI: [-18.976, 16.062]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working Memory

Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) for solifenacin (6 hours) and oxybutynin (2 hours). Quality of working memory is calculated from the sum of two cognitive function sensitivity tests: Numeric Working Memory Sensitivity and Spatial Working Memory Sensitivity, and ranges from -2 to 2. A higher score reflects a good working memory and a negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to the baseline assessment.

Time frame: Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.

Population: The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]1.7921 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24313
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryChange from Baseline at 2 hours-0.0867 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39254
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]1.6666 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35805
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryChange from Baseline at 6 hours0.0580 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46462
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryChange from Baseline at 6 hours0.0633 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46684
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]1.7251 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31582
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]1.6441 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34113
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryChange from Baseline at 2 hours-0.0043 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35428
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryChange from Baseline at 6 hours0.0047 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41656
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryChange from Baseline at 2 hours0.0492 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37776
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]1.7548 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35808
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working MemoryBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]1.7087 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24215
Comparison: Comparison of solifenacin versus placebo change from Baseline at 6 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.627595% CI: [-0.208, 0.127]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of oxybutynin versus placebo change from Baseline at 2 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.536195% CI: [-0.194, 0.103]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of Memory

Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Speed of Memory was calculated from the sum of 4 cognitive function speed tests: numeric and spatial working memory and word and picture recognition. A low score reflects that a person is able to recall a name, a face or any other item fast from the episodic secondary memory; a positive change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline.

Time frame: Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.

Population: The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]4505.96 msecStandard Deviation 957.434
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryChange from Baseline at 2 hours24.09 msecStandard Deviation 762.881
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]4496.65 msecStandard Deviation 653.186
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryChange from Baseline at 6 hours-149.79 msecStandard Deviation 494.835
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryChange from Baseline at 6 hours-118.14 msecStandard Deviation 471.318
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]4545.75 msecStandard Deviation 789.173
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]4606.51 msecStandard Deviation 846.669
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryChange from Baseline at 2 hours-11.56 msecStandard Deviation 571.131
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryChange from Baseline at 6 hours-126.04 msecStandard Deviation 728.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryChange from Baseline at 2 hours-240.62 msecStandard Deviation 471.516
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]4655.29 msecStandard Deviation 923.39
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of MemoryBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]4741.30 msecStandard Deviation 820.101
Comparison: Comparison of solifenacin versus placebo change from Baseline at 6 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.595395% CI: [-372.814, 216.976]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of oxybutynin versus placebo change from Baseline at 2 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.352695% CI: [-182.015, 497.581]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Postural Stability Test

The postural stability test measures the ability to stand upright without moving, and was assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Using apparatus modeled on the Wright Ataxia-meter, a cord from the meter is attached to the patient who is required to stand as still as possible with feet apart and eyes closed for 1 minute. The amount of sway is expressed as the total angular movement, summed regardless of sign, in the antero-posterior plane and calibrated in units of one-third degree of angle of sway. Wright (1971) described a range of 20-30 units as a normal range for adults with eyes wide open, increasing by 50 to 100% with eyes shut.

Time frame: Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose.

Population: The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]37.7 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 23.35
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestChange from Baseline at 2 hours5.2 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 9.65
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]37.7 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 19.42
SolifenacinChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestChange from Baseline at 6 hours9.9 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 16.14
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestChange from Baseline at 6 hours0.7 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 17.6
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]36.2 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 20.05
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]38.9 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 23.59
OxybutyninChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestChange from Baseline at 2 hours2.7 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 17.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestChange from Baseline at 6 hours-0.1 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 10.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestChange from Baseline at 2 hours0.4 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 16.81
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestBaseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax]40.0 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 26.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Postural Stability TestBaseline at 2 hours [Oxybutynin Tmax]37.5 1/3 degree of angle of swayStandard Deviation 20.04
Comparison: Comparison of solifenacin versus placebo change from Baseline at 6 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.050595% CI: [-0.023, 18.326]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of oxybutynin versus placebo change from Baseline at 2 hours~The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments.p-value: 0.675395% CI: [-7.02, 10.713]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026