Skip to content

Uncovered Self-expandable Metal Stent Versus Double Layer Plastic Stent for Malignant Hilar Stricture

Uncovered Self-expandable Metal Stent Versus DoubleLayer Plastic Stent for Malignant Hilar Stricture: a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01125865
Enrollment
100
Registered
2010-05-19
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2011-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bile Duct Obstruction, Klatskin's Tumor

Keywords

Malignant hilar stricture

Brief summary

The overall median survival of nonresectable malignant hilar obstruction in most series has been less than 6 months. Most patients with malignant hilar obstruction present with advanced disease, making palliative endoscopic drainage the principal therapeutic option. However, the optimal endoscopic management strategy is contentious. Almost all of the published data comparing plastic and metallic stents relate to distal tumors (those of the pancreas, common bile duct and ampulla). Stent patency, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness have favored metallic stents when compared with plastic stents in patients with distal malignant obstruction expected to live at least 3 to 6 months. There are few comparative study as to whether self-expanding metallic or plastic stent, especially DLS (double layer plastic stent) are preferable in the technical success, stent patency, and cost-effectiveness for palliating malignant hilar obstruction. The study was designed to compare the the technical success, stent patency, and cost-effectiveness of self-expandable metal stent and DLS in patients with malignant hilar obstruction.

Interventions

DEVICESEMS insertion

Self-expandable metallic stent will be inserted for malignant hilar obstruction.

DEVICEDLS insertion

DoubleLayer plastic stent will be inserted for malignant hilar obstruction.

Sponsors

Soon Chun Hyang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient over 18 years old * Patient with malignant hilar obstruction

Exclusion criteria

* No written informed consent * Patient with uncorrectable severe coagulopathy * Indication for surgical operation * Karnofsky score \< 60%

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stent patencyUp to 2 yearsInterval time (d) from stent insertion to occlusion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All cause complicationsUp to 2 yearsEarly or Late complications * asymptomatic hyperamylasemia * pancreatitis (mild/moderate/severe) * cholecystitis * cholangitis * recurrent jaundice * Internal migration * external migration * occlusion
Cost-effectivenessUp to 2 yearsTotal Cost for SEMS and DLS group * ERCP cost * Total ERBD cost (DLS or metal) * Total hospitalization cost * Cost for session x No. of session * Total (DLS vs. metal)cost /session
MortalityUp to 2 years
Technical successwithin 24 hr after stent insertion* Successful insertion of bilateral or unilateral stent insertion. * Time to adequate expansion (70% of maximal expanded diameter was dilated state) in metal stent ≤ 24 hrs * No stent migration within 24 hrs

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactDo Hyun Park, MD
dhpark@amc.seoul.kr+82-2-3010-3180
Backup ContactTae Hoon Lee, MD
thlee9@lycos.co.kr+82-41-570-3662

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026