Skip to content

Supplementary Angiographic Embolization for Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

Supplementary Angiographic Embolization for Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01125852
Enrollment
105
Registered
2010-05-19
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2013-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage

Keywords

Peptic ulcer hemorrhage, Peptic ulcer bleeding, Angiographic embolization, Arterial embolization, Angiography

Brief summary

Peptic ulcer bleeding is a common disorder. Despite optimal endoscopic and medical treatment, there is a high risk of rebleeding and high mortality. In this study the investigators examine whether combined endoscopic haemostasis and angiographic embolization resolves in a better outcome than the traditional use of endoscopic haemostasis alone. The study is a randomised controlled trail.

Interventions

Patients in the intervention arm receive supplementary angiographic embolization within 24 hours from the therapeutic endoscopy.

PROCEDURETherapeutic endoscopy

Patients are treated with standard therapeutic upper endoscopy including endoscopic combination therapy.

Sponsors

Odense University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical signs of upper GI-bleeding * Endoscopic verified high-risk ulcer (Forrest I-IIb) * Primary haemostasis achieved

Exclusion criteria

* Expected lifetime \< 1 month * Upper GI-cancer found at endoscopy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite EndpointMeassured after a week from primary therapeutic endoscopyPatients are classified into groups depending on the worst outcome: 1. No clinical signs of rebleeding and requirement of two or less blood transfusions after circulatory stabilization and obtained hemoglobin \> 5,9mmol/L. 2. No clinical signs of rebleeding and requirement of more than two blood transfusions after circulatory stabilization and obtained hemoglobin \> 5,9mmol/L. 3. Rebleeding and achieved secondary haemostasis by endoscopy or angiographic embolization. 4. Rebleeding requiring surgery. 5. Patients who have died. Results are compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rebleeding1 monthRebleeding from ulcer confirmed by endoscopy, angiography or surgery within a month from therapeutic endoscopy.
Blood transfusion1 monthAmount of received blood transfusions after circulatory stabilization and obtained hemoglobin \> 5,9mmol/L. Patients will only receive blood transfusion if hemoglobin \< 6,0mmol/L
Surgical haemostasis1 monthRebleeding requiring surgical haemostasis within a month from therapeutic endoscopy.
Mortality1 monthPatients who have died within af month from therapeutic endoscopy.
Duration of hospitalizationEstimated 4 daysTime from hospitalization to discharge.
Thromboembolic complications1 monthOccurence of thromboembolic complications due to angiographic embolization, surgery or therapeutic endoscopy.
Endoscopic/other haemostatic retreatment1 monthRebleeding confirmed by endoscopy or angiography and achieved secondary haemostasis by endoscopy or angiographic embolization.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026