Skip to content

High Dose Interleukin-2 Followed by Intermittent Low Dose Temozolomide in Patients With Melanoma

Phase II Trial of High Dose Interleukin-2 Followed by Intermittent Low Dose Temozolomide in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01124734
Enrollment
17
Registered
2010-05-17
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2018-07-01
Last updated
2019-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant Melanoma

Keywords

Metastatic melanoma

Brief summary

The investigators have observed that many patients who had received high dose Interleukin-2 (IL2) and failed to respond to it but who then go immediately to temozolomide seemed to enjoy extremely good responses which seem better quality and longer duration than typically observed for temozolomide alone. To date, the investigators have observed 5 sequentially treated patients with metastatic melanoma who had failed high dose IL-2 but who then went on to receive immediate temozolomide. Two of these patients had complete responses and 3 had very strong partial response. In a recent phase II study of extended low dose temozolomide alone given in the same manner as the post IL-2 patients noted above, the response rate was 12.5% and all of these were partial responses only. The responses that the investigators observed were at a much higher rate of response as well as much better quality than expected for temozolomide. The responses were also better than those observed when temozolomide was given first and then followed by high dose IL-2. The investigators concluded that perhaps the major benefit the investigators observed was a result of the prior high dose IL-2 therapy modulated by the temozolomide and that the sequence of treatment was clearly crucial for this response.

Detailed description

Metastatic malignant melanoma remains a disease with a very poor prognosis and median survival duration of less than one year. Durable remissions with conventional therapy are rare and therefore clinical trials remain a primary treatment modality for metastatic disease. There are 2 currently FDA-approved therapies for metastatic melanoma. Chemotherapy with single agent parenteral dacarbazine or its oral pro-drug, temozolomide, are capable of producing responses in 6.5 to 20% of patients. These responses are usually minor to partial at best and are not durable. Combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs has not been successful. The immune system also seems to play a role in malignant melanoma. High dose Interferon therapy is the current standard therapy for the adjuvant treatment of stage IIB, IIC and III melanoma after surgical resection in which it has shown to result in modest improvements in disease free survival and overall survival. In metastatic disease, various immunologic approaches have been employed as well. High dose IL-2 can produce a response rate of about 10-15% in patients with metastatic melanoma. About 5-10% of responses are complete and some of these complete responses are durable so that the lucky few patients who have a durable complete response are for all intents and purposes cured. Attempts to combine chemotherapy with immunotherapy, although improving response rates, has not impacted survival as summarized in recent meta-analysis.

Interventions

DRUGInterleukin-2

Participants will receive IL-2 up to a maximum of 14 doses at 600,000 IU/kg

DRUGTemozolomide

Participants receive temozolomide at 75 mg/m2 after completion of the second cycle of high dose IL-2. Participants take the medication at bedtime daily. Four weeks after Cycle 2 of a course, they would take it for 21 days.

Sponsors

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single group, open label study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pathologically confirmed metastatic malignant melanoma * Age \> 18 years * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 * Patients considered good candidate for conventional high dose IL-2 * No chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy or radiation therapy within 1 month of entry * Patients with a history or clinical evidence of brain metastasis must have completed radiation therapy or surgical treatment of brain lesions and have no evidence of central nervous system progression for at least 8 weeks at the time of enrollment. * Patients may have had prior high dose IL-2 or temozolomide but not together or with high dose IL-2 followed by temozolomide * Patients may have had prior high dose interferon as adjuvant treatment for high risk melanoma * Serum creatinine \< 2 mg/dL * Bilirubin \< 2 mg/dL

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent * Hypersensitivity to temozolomide or HD IL-2 * Active gastrointestinal disorder or cardiac disorders * Ejection fraction \< 50% by echocardiogram or corrected diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide \< 50% on diffusion capacity testing pulmonary function tests * platelets \< 100 K, neutrophils \< 1000 * Serum Creatinine \< 2 x the upper limits of normal * Chronic use of steroids other than for simple adrenal replacement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide2 yearsClinical response was measured using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria categorizing responses as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minor response (MR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD).
Duration of Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide8 yearsDuration of response is defined as the length (measured in days) from the date of best response to the date of progression (if any), or to the date of last follow-up (if no progression is observed). The duration of response is applicable for those CR/MR/PR/SD subjects only.
Safety and Toxicity of H-D IL-2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide2 yearsSafety and toxicity in this study population was evaluated using the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria. The unit of measure is the number of study participants with one or more unexpected and related (even remotely) SAE.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)2 yearsThe effect outcome is measured by the change in percentage of circulating lymphocyte cells (autoimmune biomarkers) that express the noted phenotype. This percentage change is determined by comparing the values obtained within 7 days of participant going off treatment against the baseline values.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a single center study conducted at Penn State Hershey Medical Center Cancer Institute. The study was carried out in the Cancer Institute outpatient clinic. Accrual was initiated 9/07/2011 and completed completed 04/28/2014. Participants remained on study for long term follow up. The study closed in July 2018.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were excluded if they received any chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, or radiation therapy within 1 month of entry to the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Course 1 Cycles 1 and 2
Course 1 Cycles of Part 1: Participants will be given High-Dose Interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) 600,000 IU/kg, up to 14 doses at 8 hour intervals. Interleukin-2: up to a maximum of 14 doses at 600,000 IU/kg Course 2: Patients will be given High-Dose Interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) 600,000 IU/kg, up to 14 doses at 8 hour intervals. On the day after discharge, patients will be given oral temozolomide at 75 mg/m2 daily for 21 days. Interleukin-2: up to a maximum of 14 doses at 600,000 IU/kg. Temozolomide: Patients would receive temozolomide at 75 mg/m2 after discharge from receipt of the second cycle of high dose IL-2. Patients would take the medication at bedtime daily. Four weeks after cycle 2 of a course, they would take it for 21 days.
17
Total17

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyDisease progression13
Overall StudyElected for alternative treatment2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCourse 1 Cycles 1 and 2
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 179 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 1717 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 171 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide

Clinical response was measured using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria categorizing responses as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minor response (MR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD).

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Course 1 Cycle 1Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose TemozolomidePartial Response0 Participants
Course 1 Cycle 1Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose TemozolomideMinor Response0 Participants
Course 1 Cycle 1Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose TemozolomideProgressive Disease0 Participants
Course 1 Cycle 1Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose TemozolomideComplete Response0 Participants
Course 1 Cycle 1Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose TemozolomideStable Disease17 Participants
Course 1 Cycle 2Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose TemozolomideComplete Response2 Participants
Course 1 Cycle 2Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose TemozolomideStable Disease4 Participants
Course 1 Cycle 2Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose TemozolomidePartial Response1 Participants
Course 1 Cycle 2Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose TemozolomideProgressive Disease9 Participants
Course 1 Cycle 2Clinical Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose TemozolomideMinor Response1 Participants
Primary

Duration of Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide

Duration of response is defined as the length (measured in days) from the date of best response to the date of progression (if any), or to the date of last follow-up (if no progression is observed). The duration of response is applicable for those CR/MR/PR/SD subjects only.

Time frame: 8 years

Population: Duration of response is applicable for those CR/MR/PR/SD subjects only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Course 1 Cycle 1Duration of Response to High-Dose Interleukin-2 (H-D IL-2) Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide432.88 Days
Primary

Safety and Toxicity of H-D IL-2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide

Safety and toxicity in this study population was evaluated using the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria. The unit of measure is the number of study participants with one or more unexpected and related (even remotely) SAE.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Course 1 Cycle 1Safety and Toxicity of H-D IL-2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide0 Participants
Course 1 Cycle 2Safety and Toxicity of H-D IL-2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide0 Participants
Secondary

Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)

The effect outcome is measured by the change in percentage of circulating lymphocyte cells (autoimmune biomarkers) that express the noted phenotype. This percentage change is determined by comparing the values obtained within 7 days of participant going off treatment against the baseline values.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Of the 17 qualifying participants, 9 underwent baseline (pre-Course 1) testing. Eleven participants consented to and underwent this POST off- treatment testing. Two of the participants tested at Post treatment did not have baseline testing done.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Course 1 Cycle 1Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)%CCR7- CD45RO+ of CD8+ Effector Memory.31 Percentage of CellsStandard Deviation 0.1
Course 1 Cycle 1Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)%CCR7- CD45RO- of CD8+ Effector Memory RA+.46 Percentage of CellsStandard Deviation 0.18
Course 1 Cycle 1Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)%CCR7- CD45RO- of CD4+ Effector Memory RA+.09 Percentage of CellsStandard Deviation 0.08
Course 1 Cycle 1Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)%CD25+FoxP3+ of CD4+ (Tregs).10 Percentage of CellsStandard Deviation 0.05
Course 1 Cycle 1Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)%CCR7- CD45RO+ of CD4+ Effector Memory.36 Percentage of CellsStandard Deviation 0.1
Course 1 Cycle 2Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)%CD25+FoxP3+ of CD4+ (Tregs).09 Percentage of CellsStandard Deviation 0.05
Course 1 Cycle 2Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)%CCR7- CD45RO+ of CD4+ Effector Memory.36 Percentage of CellsStandard Deviation 0.1
Course 1 Cycle 2Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)%CCR7- CD45RO+ of CD8+ Effector Memory.34 Percentage of CellsStandard Deviation 0.16
Course 1 Cycle 2Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)%CCR7- CD45RO- of CD4+ Effector Memory RA+.08 Percentage of CellsStandard Deviation 0.07
Course 1 Cycle 2Effect of High Dose IL2 Followed by Low Dose Temozolomide on Lymphocyte Subsets (Autoimmune Biomarkers)%CCR7- CD45RO- of CD8+ Effector Memory RA+.40 Percentage of CellsStandard Deviation 0.15

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026