Skip to content

Transdermal Methylphenidate for Cancer-Related Fatigue

Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Methylphenidate for Cancer-Related Fatigue

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01124500
Enrollment
0
Registered
2010-05-17
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2010-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer

Keywords

methylphenidate, transdermal patch, placebo, fatigue, 10-020

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects, good and/or bad, of the Methylphenidate patch and a placebo patch (a patch that contains no medicine) on patients and their fatigue caused by cancer or by cancer treatment. The Methylphenidate patch contains a medication that is known to increase alertness and wakefulness. Oral methylphenidate has been used in the past to treat cancer related fatigue and is often used to treat unusual sleepiness. But this is the first time that the patch form is offered to try treating cancer fatigue in patients who cannot always swallow tablets.

Interventions

DRUGmethylphenidate via transdermal patch compared to placebo

The participants will start with a 10mg MPH patch on day -4, the 1st day of the titration period. This will be increased up to 20mg over 4-day titration period as needed and tolerated, and continued on the optimal dose. Subjects will be seen on day 1 of the double-blind part of the study at a patient education room or the Dr.'s office and receive 10 identical patches including 5 MPH and 5 placebo patches that will be randomly assigned over the 10-day course. The patch will be placed at 9am and removed at 4pm daily for 10 days. During the 10 days, each subject will be monitored for continuous 240 hours by actigraphy based activity monitors to follow activity levels and energy expenditure.

Sponsors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of head and neck cancer who underwent combined modality treatment with curative intent * Has not undergone cancer treatment in the last 4 weeks * Is 21 years of age or older * Fatigue scale score of 4 or higher * Is able to understand English, through written and verbal communication * In the judgment of the consenting professional, is able to provide informed consent * Physically able to present for follow-up appointments at outpatient Radiation Oncology or Pain & Palliative Care clinics * Probable life expectancy of more than 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Pulmonary or cardiovascular failure, seizure disorder, sleep disorder, mental impairment, psychiatric disorder, or pregnancy * Has known sensitivity or allergies to methylphenidate * Receiving concurrent treatment with a psychostimulant * Hospitalized patients * Evidence of impaired hepatic or renal function (hyperbilirubinemia, greater than two fold elevation of transaminases; \>40mg/dl BUN or \>1.5mg/dl Cr ) * Anemia ( hemoglobin \<10mg/dl)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To investigate the efficacy of sustained-release, transdermal methylphenidate compared to a placebo.for 10 daysIn reducing fatigue, increasing activity levels, and sustaining steady wakefulness throughout the day. The outcome measure will be BFI and ESS based self-reporting of the reduction of numeric rating scale on fatigue level and sleepiness, combined with objective measurement of increased activity intensity scores monitored by actigraphy.
To evaluate the possible side effects of a methylphenidate patch.for 10 daysIn adult head and neck cancer patients with fatigue.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To evaluate the feasibility of accelerometry-based objective outcome measures to assess improved activity levels and energy expenditure of cancer patients.for 10 daysTo evaluate the feasibility of accelerometry-based objective outcome measures to assess improved activity levels and energy expenditure, will be evaluated by examining the patients' rating of their comfort while wearing the actigraphy device and of how willing they would be to wear the device for a future study.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026