Skip to content

Electrical Stimulation for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

Electrical Stimulation for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01123382
Enrollment
25
Registered
2010-05-14
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2018-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Pain, Stroke

Keywords

Stroke, Shoulder pain, Electrical stimulation, Neuromuscular stimulation, Intramuscular stimulation

Brief summary

Post-stroke shoulder pain is a major rehabilitation problem affecting moderate to severely impaired stroke survivors. Surface electrical stimulation (ES) of muscles surrounding the hemiparetic shoulder has been demonstrated to be beneficial, but despite the evidence for therapeutic benefit, the clinical implementation of surface ES for poststroke shoulder pain has been difficult. In order to address the limitations of surface ES, the investigative team pioneered the development of percutaneous intramuscular (IM) ES for the treatment of post-stroke shoulder pain. However, prior to acceptance by the clinical community, additional gaps in the scientific and clinical knowledge need to be addressed. This study begins to do so. The primary objective is to estimate the relative pain reduction associated with IM ES vs. usual care. We hypothesize that the IM ES group will exhibit a larger effect size with respect to pain reduction compared to usual care. A secondary objective is to estimate the effect on health related QOL of IM ES vs. usual care. Demonstration of improvement in QOL will validate the clinical relevance of the intervention. We hypothesize that the IM ES group will exhibit greater improvement in health related QOL compared to usual care.

Interventions

DEVICEIntramuscular Electrical Stimulator

A sterile percutaneous IM electrode is implanted in the shoulder using a 20-gauge hypodermic needle and connected to an external cable. The exit site and electrode are covered by a bandage, but the cable extends out. After a one week stabilization period, the cable is connected to a stimulator. A self-adhesive surface electrode serves as the indifferent electrode. Stimulation intensity is set by the investigator. The prescription for daily stimulation treatment will be 6 hrs. The duty cycle and daily dose will remain constant throughout the treatment, but stimulus parameters may be adjusted by the research staff as deemed appropriate. The treatment period will be 3 weeks, after which the electrode will be removed. Total time of electrode implantation is no more than 29 days.

OTHEROutpatient Therapy

Subjects will receive 8 hrs of outpatient therapy over a four week period from a treating therapist, coupled with prescribed daily home exercises. The therapist will implement an individualized treatment plan consistent with the needs of the participant.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Case Western Reserve University
CollaboratorOTHER
MetroHealth Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* shoulder pain localized to the glenohumeral joint, subacromial area or deltoid insertion associated with any of the following conditions: a) rest; b) passive abduction or external rotation ROM; c) active abduction or external rotation ROM; or d) manual palpation * weakness of shoulder abductors (≤4/5 on MRC if isolated movement is present) * age ≥21-yrs * time from stroke ≥ 3-mo * shoulder pain onset after the most recent stroke * duration of shoulder pain ≥ 3-mo * severity of shoulder pain on BPI-SF 3 ≥4 * cognitive ability to fulfill study requirements \[a) exhibit 3 object immediate and 30 minute recall; b) ability to use a numeric rating scale (using a 0-10 numeric rating scale) by correctly ranking the tightness they feel on the unaffected arm of 3 low-pressure inflations with a standard sphygmomanometer cuff which follow a predetermined sequence (20, 40 and 0 mm Hg); and c) ability to follow 3-stage commands\] * availability of a reliable adult who can check the skin and assist the participant with the treatment protocol * willing and able to report severity of shoulder pain throughout the study period * willing to make all scheduled study visits post-implantation.

Exclusion criteria

* evidence of joint or overlying skin infection * insensate skin * \>1 opioid or nonopioid analgesics daily for shoulder pain * daily intake of pain medications for any other chronic pain * intra-articular or subacromial steroid injections to the shoulder in the previous 12-wks * botulinum toxin injection to the trapezius, pectoralis or subscapularis muscle in the previous 12-wks * receiving physical or occupational therapies for shoulder pain * physician-diagnosed shoulder pathology symptomatic within the 5 yrs prior to CVA * bleeding disorder * INR\>3.0 for those on warfarin \[INR\>3.0\] * poorly controlled diabetes \[HbA1c\>7.0\] * medical instability * pregnancy * uncontrolled seizures (\>1/mo for 6-mo) * uncompensated hemi-neglect * severely impaired communication * moderate to severe depression * other confounding conditions such as ipsilateral upper limb lower motorneuron lesion, Parkinson's Disease, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury or multiple sclerosis * other medical issues such as complex regional pain syndrome, bicipital tendonitis, myofacial pain syndrome, etc. * the following cardiac conditions: a) history of arrhythmia with hemodynamic instability, such as ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia and rapid ventricular response atrial fibrillation; b) any implantable stimulator such as demand pacemakers or defibrillators; and c) valvular heart disease including artificial valves (due to risk of infection and endocarditis) * likely non-compliance factors such as distance from the center, inadequate social support, or psychiatric/psychologic factors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brief Pain Inventory Short FormBaseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)The BPI is a pain questionnaire, which assesses both pain intensity (sensory dimension) and the interference (reactive dimension) of pain in daily activities. Pain intensity is measured on a 0 - 10 scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst possible.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SF-36 Bodily Pain ComponentBaseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)The SF-36v2 is a population-norm based health related quality of life measure, presented in T-scores where population average equals a score of 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Maximum is 100, with higher score indicating greater health realated quality of life.
Pain-free External ROM, DegreesBaseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)Passive pain-free Externa ROM is a motor recovery measure. The subject was supine with the shoulder adducted with hand resting on the abdomen, elbow flexed, and with the humerus supported by the mat. The axis of a universal goniometer was centered on the olecranon process of the ulna projecting through the humeral shaft toward the humeral head. The subject's shoulder was externally rotated passively to the pain threshold, defined as the start of any pain. Pain at rest was recorded as 0 degrees.
Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper ExtremityBaseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)The Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) is a motor recovery measure. Volitional movement of the upper limb (shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand) is examined in and out of synergies. Each item was graded on a 3-point ordinal scale and summed to provide a maximum score of 66, with higher scores indicating lower impairment.
ShoulderQ VGRS ScaleBaseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)The ShoulderQ Visual Graphics Rating Scale (VGRS) T is a structured questionnaire designed to assess severity of HSP at rest during the day, on movement, and at night on a 0-30 scale where higher numbers indicate greater pain.
Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to UnaffectedBaseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)A measure of isometric strength in response to audio cue. Isometric shoulder abduction moment was measured with a Biodex Biomechanical Measurement System (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY). The average moment during the last second of the audible tone was calculated for each trial and those values were averaged over the three trials. Subjects underwent testing of both shoulders, non-paretic side first, and the results are presented as the ratio of the paretic shoulder to the non-paretic shoulder to decrease the influence of intra-subject variability between measurements.
Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityBaseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)Electromyographic activity from the deltoid was also measured during the isometric abduction moment trials. Surface EMG recording electrodes (2 cm x 2 cm) were placed over the deltoid muscle and spaced approximately 4 cm apart. The EMG amplifier gain was adjusted to record as high-fidelity an EMG signal as possible during shoulder abduction. Delay of initiation (DOI) was defined as the duration between onset of the audibe tone and the onset of EMG signal. Raw EMG signals were analyzed visually to determine the earliest rise in EMG activity relative to steady state for delay of initiation. The mean DOI of the three trials were calculated, and the ratio of the paretic to non-paretic shoulder DOI were used as summary metrics.
Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityBaseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)Electromyographic activity from the deltoid was also measured during the isometric abduction moment trials. Surface EMG recording electrodes (2 cm x 2 cm) were placed over the deltoid muscle and spaced approximately 4 cm apart. The EMG amplifier gain was adjusted to record as high-fidelity an EMG signal as possible during shoulder abduction. Delay of termination (DOT) was defined as the duration between cessation of the audible tone and return of the EMG signal to baseline. Raw EMG signals were analyzed visually to determine the earliest rise in EMG activity relative to steady state for delay of initiation, and return to steady for delay of termination. The mean DOT of the three trials were calculated, and the ratio of the paretic to non-paretic shoulder DOT were used as summary metrics.
Pain Interference QuestionnaireBaseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)BPI-9 from Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form. Pain interference is on a 0 - 10 scale, with 0 being no interference, and 10 being complete interference.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)
The IM ES Group will receive electrical stimulation treatment for three weeks (6 hrs daily) with an Intramuscular Electrical Stimulator following a one week electrode stabilization period. Intramuscular Electrical Stimulator: A sterile percutaneous IM electrode is implanted in the shoulder using a 20-gauge hypodermic needle and connected to an external cable. The exit site and electrode are covered by a bandage, but the cable extends out. After a one week stabilization period, the cable is connected to a stimulator. A self-adhesive surface electrode serves as the indifferent electrode. Stimulation intensity is set by the investigator. The prescription for daily stimulation treatment will be 6 hrs. The duty cycle and daily dose will remain constant throughout the treatment, but stimulus parameters may be adjusted by the research staff as deemed appropriate. The treatment period will be 3 weeks, after which the electrode will be removed.
13
Usual Care (UC)
The Usual Care Group will receive outpatient therapy for four weeks, coupled with prescribed daily home exercises. Outpatient Therapy: Subjects will receive 8 hrs of outpatient therapy over a four week period from a treating therapist, coupled with prescribed daily home exercises. The therapist will implement an individualized treatment plan consistent with the needs of the participant.
12
Total25

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Usual Care (UC)Total
Age, Continuous54.0 years55.5 years55.0 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 Participants12 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Shoulder pain > 18 mos8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Time Since Stroke2.1 years2.3 years2.1 years

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 130 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 131 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Brief Pain Inventory Short Form

The BPI is a pain questionnaire, which assesses both pain intensity (sensory dimension) and the interference (reactive dimension) of pain in daily activities. Pain intensity is measured on a 0 - 10 scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst possible.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Brief Pain Inventory Short FormWeek 16.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Brief Pain Inventory Short FormWeek 103.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Brief Pain Inventory Short FormWeek 42.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Brief Pain Inventory Short FormWeek 163.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Brief Pain Inventory Short FormWeek 07.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Usual Care (UC)Brief Pain Inventory Short FormWeek 166.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Usual Care (UC)Brief Pain Inventory Short FormWeek 07.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Usual Care (UC)Brief Pain Inventory Short FormWeek 16.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Usual Care (UC)Brief Pain Inventory Short FormWeek 45.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Usual Care (UC)Brief Pain Inventory Short FormWeek 106.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Comparison: To detect a minimum clinically important difference of 2 points2 on the BPI-SF3 with an anticipated standard deviation for each mean of 2.5, estimated from a prior study, with an alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, for five waves of data, a sample size of 10 participants per group was necessary. With anticipated dropouts, a sample size of at least 12 participants per group was required.p-value: 0.04Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG Activity

Electromyographic activity from the deltoid was also measured during the isometric abduction moment trials. Surface EMG recording electrodes (2 cm x 2 cm) were placed over the deltoid muscle and spaced approximately 4 cm apart. The EMG amplifier gain was adjusted to record as high-fidelity an EMG signal as possible during shoulder abduction. Delay of initiation (DOI) was defined as the duration between onset of the audibe tone and the onset of EMG signal. Raw EMG signals were analyzed visually to determine the earliest rise in EMG activity relative to steady state for delay of initiation. The mean DOI of the three trials were calculated, and the ratio of the paretic to non-paretic shoulder DOI were used as summary metrics.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 11.3 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.2
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 101.2 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.2
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 41.2 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.2
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 161.4 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.2
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 01.4 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.2
Usual Care (UC)Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 161.2 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.3
Usual Care (UC)Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 01.6 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.2
Usual Care (UC)Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 11.3 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.3
Usual Care (UC)Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 41.4 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.3
Usual Care (UC)Delay in Initiation of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 101.2 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.3
p-value: 0.59Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG Activity

Electromyographic activity from the deltoid was also measured during the isometric abduction moment trials. Surface EMG recording electrodes (2 cm x 2 cm) were placed over the deltoid muscle and spaced approximately 4 cm apart. The EMG amplifier gain was adjusted to record as high-fidelity an EMG signal as possible during shoulder abduction. Delay of termination (DOT) was defined as the duration between cessation of the audible tone and return of the EMG signal to baseline. Raw EMG signals were analyzed visually to determine the earliest rise in EMG activity relative to steady state for delay of initiation, and return to steady for delay of termination. The mean DOT of the three trials were calculated, and the ratio of the paretic to non-paretic shoulder DOT were used as summary metrics.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 12.6 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.6
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 101.9 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.7
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 41.7 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.6
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 161.7 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.5
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 02.3 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.5
Usual Care (UC)Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 162.6 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.7
Usual Care (UC)Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 01.3 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.6
Usual Care (UC)Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 13.7 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.6
Usual Care (UC)Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 42.0 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.7
Usual Care (UC)Delay in Termination of Shoulder Abduction EMG ActivityWeek 101.5 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.5
p-value: 0.69Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper Extremity

The Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) is a motor recovery measure. Volitional movement of the upper limb (shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand) is examined in and out of synergies. Each item was graded on a 3-point ordinal scale and summed to provide a maximum score of 66, with higher scores indicating lower impairment.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper ExtremityWeek 429.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.6
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper ExtremityWeek 1029.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.6
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper ExtremityWeek 127.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.6
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper ExtremityWeek 1629.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.6
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper ExtremityWeek 026.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.6
Usual Care (UC)Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper ExtremityWeek 1626.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.9
Usual Care (UC)Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper ExtremityWeek 023.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.9
Usual Care (UC)Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper ExtremityWeek 124.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.9
Usual Care (UC)Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper ExtremityWeek 1025.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.9
Usual Care (UC)Fugl-Myer Motor Assessment (FMA) - Upper ExtremityWeek 424.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.9
p-value: 0.61Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to Unaffected

A measure of isometric strength in response to audio cue. Isometric shoulder abduction moment was measured with a Biodex Biomechanical Measurement System (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY). The average moment during the last second of the audible tone was calculated for each trial and those values were averaged over the three trials. Subjects underwent testing of both shoulders, non-paretic side first, and the results are presented as the ratio of the paretic shoulder to the non-paretic shoulder to decrease the influence of intra-subject variability between measurements.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to UnaffectedWeek 10.4 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.1
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to UnaffectedWeek 100.5 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.1
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to UnaffectedWeek 40.4 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.1
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to UnaffectedWeek 160.5 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.1
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to UnaffectedWeek 00.3 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.1
Usual Care (UC)Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to UnaffectedWeek 160.4 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.1
Usual Care (UC)Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to UnaffectedWeek 00.3 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.1
Usual Care (UC)Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to UnaffectedWeek 10.3 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.1
Usual Care (UC)Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to UnaffectedWeek 40.3 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.1
Usual Care (UC)Isometric Shoulder Abduction Moment, Ratio Affected to UnaffectedWeek 100.3 ratio of affected to unaffected armStandard Error 0.1
p-value: 0.46Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Pain-free External ROM, Degrees

Passive pain-free Externa ROM is a motor recovery measure. The subject was supine with the shoulder adducted with hand resting on the abdomen, elbow flexed, and with the humerus supported by the mat. The axis of a universal goniometer was centered on the olecranon process of the ulna projecting through the humeral shaft toward the humeral head. The subject's shoulder was externally rotated passively to the pain threshold, defined as the start of any pain. Pain at rest was recorded as 0 degrees.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Pain-free External ROM, DegreesWeek 156.2 degreesStandard Error 14.6
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Pain-free External ROM, DegreesWeek 1077.0 degreesStandard Error 14.6
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Pain-free External ROM, DegreesWeek 480.8 degreesStandard Error 14.6
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Pain-free External ROM, DegreesWeek 1676.9 degreesStandard Error 14.6
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Pain-free External ROM, DegreesWeek 050.5 degreesStandard Error 14.4
Usual Care (UC)Pain-free External ROM, DegreesWeek 1641.5 degreesStandard Error 15.9
Usual Care (UC)Pain-free External ROM, DegreesWeek 026.7 degreesStandard Error 15
Usual Care (UC)Pain-free External ROM, DegreesWeek 134.0 degreesStandard Error 15.2
Usual Care (UC)Pain-free External ROM, DegreesWeek 443.7 degreesStandard Error 15.9
Usual Care (UC)Pain-free External ROM, DegreesWeek 1037.4 degreesStandard Error 15.6
p-value: 0.33Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Pain Interference Questionnaire

BPI-9 from Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form. Pain interference is on a 0 - 10 scale, with 0 being no interference, and 10 being complete interference.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Pain Interference QuestionnaireWeek 12.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Pain Interference QuestionnaireWeek 100.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Pain Interference QuestionnaireWeek 40.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Pain Interference QuestionnaireWeek 161.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)Pain Interference QuestionnaireWeek 03.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Usual Care (UC)Pain Interference QuestionnaireWeek 163.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Usual Care (UC)Pain Interference QuestionnaireWeek 05.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Usual Care (UC)Pain Interference QuestionnaireWeek 14.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Usual Care (UC)Pain Interference QuestionnaireWeek 42.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Usual Care (UC)Pain Interference QuestionnaireWeek 103.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
p-value: 0.398Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

SF-36 Bodily Pain Component

The SF-36v2 is a population-norm based health related quality of life measure, presented in T-scores where population average equals a score of 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Maximum is 100, with higher score indicating greater health realated quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)SF-36 Bodily Pain ComponentWeek 141.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)SF-36 Bodily Pain ComponentWeek 1048.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)SF-36 Bodily Pain ComponentWeek 447.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)SF-36 Bodily Pain ComponentWeek 1649.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.3
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)SF-36 Bodily Pain ComponentWeek 036.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Usual Care (UC)SF-36 Bodily Pain ComponentWeek 1646.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
Usual Care (UC)SF-36 Bodily Pain ComponentWeek 036.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 2
Usual Care (UC)SF-36 Bodily Pain ComponentWeek 138.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Usual Care (UC)SF-36 Bodily Pain ComponentWeek 444.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
Usual Care (UC)SF-36 Bodily Pain ComponentWeek 1041.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.1
p-value: 0.543Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

ShoulderQ VGRS Scale

The ShoulderQ Visual Graphics Rating Scale (VGRS) T is a structured questionnaire designed to assess severity of HSP at rest during the day, on movement, and at night on a 0-30 scale where higher numbers indicate greater pain.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0); Start of Treatment (Week 1); End of Treatment (EOT, Week 4); EOT + 6 wks (Week 10); EOT + 12 wks (Week 16)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)ShoulderQ VGRS ScaleWeek 114.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)ShoulderQ VGRS ScaleWeek 106.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)ShoulderQ VGRS ScaleWeek 46.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)ShoulderQ VGRS ScaleWeek 167.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
IM Electrical Stimulation (IM ES)ShoulderQ VGRS ScaleWeek 016.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Usual Care (UC)ShoulderQ VGRS ScaleWeek 1613.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.6
Usual Care (UC)ShoulderQ VGRS ScaleWeek 016.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Usual Care (UC)ShoulderQ VGRS ScaleWeek 115.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Usual Care (UC)ShoulderQ VGRS ScaleWeek 411.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 2
Usual Care (UC)ShoulderQ VGRS ScaleWeek 1010.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
p-value: 0.059Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026