Skip to content

Airway Management Study to Evaluate the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope as an Alternative to the Direct Laryngoscopy

Evaluation of the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope After Failed Direct Laryngoscopy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01122433
Enrollment
50
Registered
2010-05-13
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2010-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unexpected Difficult Airway

Keywords

difficult airway, indirect laryngoscopy, C-MAC video laryngoscope

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the C-MAC video laryngoscope in difficult airway situations.

Detailed description

Unanticipated difficulties during tracheal intubation and failure to intubate are among the leading causes of anaesthesia related morbidity and mortality. Using the technique of video laryngoscopy, the alignment of the oral and pharyngeal axis to facilitate endotracheal intubation is obsolete. In this study we evaluate the C-MAC video laryngoscope (STORZ, Tuttlingen, Germany) for endotracheal intubation in difficult intubation situations (Cormack & Lehane (CL) grade 3 and 4) validated by Macintosh laryngoscope. We hypothesize that endotracheal intubation is possible using the C-MAC in patients after failed direct laryngoscopy. We also examine whether visualisation of the glottis is improved with this device compared to direct laryngoscopy and possible complications such as soft tissue injury.

Interventions

DEVICEEndotracheal intubation using the C-MAC video laryngoscope

Using the C-MAC video laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation after failed direct laryngoscopy

Sponsors

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unexpected difficult airway

Exclusion criteria

* History of difficult or impossible mask ventilation * Age \< 18 years * ASA grade \> 3 * Emergency surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success rate of endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC video laryngoscopeThe investigators evaluate the C-MAC as an alternative after failed direct laryngoscopy. Primary outcome measure is the success rate using the C-MAC video laryngoscope in unexpected difficult airways.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
- improved glottic viewAccording to the Cormacl-Lehane classification the improved glottis view using the C-MAC is documented.
- complicationsPossible complications are supra glottic trauma, tooth damage, soft tissure bleeding,...
- numbers of intubation attemptsNecessary intubation attempts using the C-MAC video laryngoscope to secutre the airway.
- size of blade (C-MAC)Different blades are available for the C-MAC. We evaluate with which blade securing the airway was possible.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026