Skip to content

Reducing Risk of Recurrence

Reducing Risk of Recurrences: Issues in Maintenance and Stability in Stroke (CDA 08-009)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01122394
Acronym
RRR
Enrollment
140
Registered
2010-05-13
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2016-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension, Stroke, TIA

Keywords

stroke, recurrence, blood pressure, prevention

Brief summary

Adults who have had a previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) remain at risk for having a second serious event, especially if they have uncontrolled blood pressure or cholesterol. However, many patients have difficulty following treatment recommendations for lowering blood pressure and cholesterol. The purpose of this research project is to evaluate the effect of 2 booster sessions of an educational counseling intervention on how well adults who have already participated in a 6-month clinical trial had a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are able to follow a treatment plan and control their blood pressure and cholesterol levels. We will also examine how effective this intervention is in improving adherence to diet, medication, and physical activity recommendations for adults who have had a prior stroke or TIA.

Detailed description

National recommendations state that patients with a history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke should receive hypertension treatment, including antihypertensive medication and lifestyle modification, with a goal of reducing blood pressure (BP) to \<120 mm Hg systolic BP and \<80 mm Hg diastolic BP. Statin treatment and lifestyle modification is also recommended for post-stroke and post-TIA patients with elevated cholesterol levels or a history of stroke or TIA with an atherosclerotic cause. Despite the clear benefits of secondary stroke prevention, there is a gap between evidence and implementation in clinical practice. We will determine whether a telephone-delivered behaviorally tailored intervention (TI) can lead to sustained change resulting in (a) BP and lipid control and (b) improved adherence to diet, medication, and exercise recommendations in veterans with a history of stroke or TIA compared to an attention placebo (AP) in veterans who have completed 6 months of a clinical trial. In this CDA project, we evaluate the long-term effectiveness of booster sessions in a randomized manner. One arm will receive 6 months of a tailored intervention (TI) followed by two booster TI sessions at 8 and 10 months, and one arm will receive 6 months of an attention placebo (AP) followed by two booster AP sessions at 8 and 10 months. BP (3 measures taken at least 5 min apart) and dietary sodium are the primary outcomes, while secondary outcomes will be total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein ratio, adherence to antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs, and exercise adherence.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTI

Tailored intervention based on the transtheoretical model

BEHAVIORALAP

Attention placebo

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Well-documented history of stroke or TIA that occurred at least 3 months prior to enrollment; * Age 21 years or older; * Continuity of care in the VAMC primary care or neurology clinics, defined as at least 1 visit in either clinic during the past 1 year; * On hypertensive and/or lipid-lowering agents; * A score of \>16 on the Mini-Mental Status Exam; * ability to exercise (assessed by 6-minute walk or timed get up and go).

Exclusion criteria

* Limited life expectancy due to a severe non-CVD related comorbid terminal illness such as cancer; * No telephone number at which patient can be reached; * Plans to relocate outside of the NYC area within the next 6 months; * Inability to communicate over the telephone due to severe cognitive impairment or aphasia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Systolic Blood Pressure6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exercise Adherence6 monthsMeasured by 7-day Physical Activity Recall
Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Ratio6 months
Dietary Sodium6 monthsself-reported stage of change for adherence to DASH (low-sodium) diet. Pre-action refers to participants reporting that they were in pre-contemplation (no plans to adhere to DASH diet in the next 6 months), contemplation (planning to adhere within the next 6 months) or preparation (planning to adhere within the next month), while action refers to participants reporting that they are in the action stage of change (became adherent to the DASH diet within the past 6 months) and maintenance refers to participants reporting that they are in the maintenance stage of change (became adherent to the DASH diet at least 6 months ago)
Antihypertensive/ Lipid-lowering Medication Adherence6 monthsMeasured by Morisky Medication taking questionnaire (self-reported). Scores range from 0-4, with 0 being least adherent and 4 being most adherent

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from a prior American Heart Association-funded study testing the effectiveness of a 6-mo TI vs. AP. Participants were recruited at completion of the AHA study to participate in the current study for an additional 6 months. They continued to receive the intervention to which they were originally assigned in the AHA study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tailored Intervention (TI)
Tailored phone intervention targeting diet, exercise, and medication adherence based on the transtheoretical model
66
Attention Placebo (AP)
General phone counseling about health topics unrelated to stroke risk factors (e.g., pain, colorectal cancer screening)
74
Total140

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTailored Intervention (TI)Attention Placebo (AP)Total
Age, Continuous66.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86
68.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
67.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.13
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American (non-Hispanic)
35 participants34 participants69 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
6 participants9 participants15 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants4 participants7 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Refused
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White (non-Hispanic)
21 participants27 participants48 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants74 Participants138 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 669 / 74
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 662 / 74

Outcome results

Primary

Systolic Blood Pressure

Time frame: 6 months

Population: restricted to only patients enrolled because they met criteria for high blood pressure at enrollment. Participants were not included if they were did not have elevated blood pressure at enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tailored Intervention (TI)Systolic Blood Pressure130.83 mm Hg
Attention Placebo (AP)Systolic Blood Pressure133.67 mm Hg
Comparison: Robust regressions were performedp-value: 0.29robust regression
Secondary

Antihypertensive/ Lipid-lowering Medication Adherence

Measured by Morisky Medication taking questionnaire (self-reported). Scores range from 0-4, with 0 being least adherent and 4 being most adherent

Time frame: 6 months

Population: One participant in TI did not answer all of the questions on this assessment, so his score could not be computed and therefore he is not included in this analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tailored Intervention (TI)Antihypertensive/ Lipid-lowering Medication Adherence3.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Attention Placebo (AP)Antihypertensive/ Lipid-lowering Medication Adherence3.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
p-value: 0.12Regression, Linear
Secondary

Dietary Sodium

self-reported stage of change for adherence to DASH (low-sodium) diet. Pre-action refers to participants reporting that they were in pre-contemplation (no plans to adhere to DASH diet in the next 6 months), contemplation (planning to adhere within the next 6 months) or preparation (planning to adhere within the next month), while action refers to participants reporting that they are in the action stage of change (became adherent to the DASH diet within the past 6 months) and maintenance refers to participants reporting that they are in the maintenance stage of change (became adherent to the DASH diet at least 6 months ago)

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tailored Intervention (TI)Dietary Sodiumpre-action11 participants
Tailored Intervention (TI)Dietary SodiumAction or Maintenance52 participants
Attention Placebo (AP)Dietary SodiumAction or Maintenance52 participants
Attention Placebo (AP)Dietary Sodiumpre-action18 participants
p-value: 0.25Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Exercise Adherence

Measured by 7-day Physical Activity Recall

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tailored Intervention (TI)Exercise Adherence2.50 hours per week of cardio
Attention Placebo (AP)Exercise Adherence2.75 hours per week of cardio
p-value: 0.81Regression, Linear
Secondary

Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Ratio

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Only participants who provided a blood sample for which cholesterol could be analyzed were included in this analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tailored Intervention (TI)Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Ratio3.47 ratio
Attention Placebo (AP)Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Ratio3.21 ratio
p-value: 0.11Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026