Skip to content

Studying An Investigational Drug Crizotinib (PF-02341066) In Non Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors That Are Positive For Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)

PHASE 1B OPEN-LABEL STUDY OF THE SAFETY AND CLINICAL ACTIVITY OF CRIZOTINIB (PF-02341066) IN TUMORS WITH GENETIC EVENTS INVOLVING THE ANAPLASTIC LYMPHOMA KINASE (ALK ) GENE LOCUS

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01121588
Enrollment
44
Registered
2010-05-12
Start date
2011-03-22
Completion date
2023-09-07
Last updated
2025-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms Malignant

Keywords

neoplasm malignant, lymphoma, neuroblastoma, Crizotinib, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ALK

Brief summary

This is a Phase 1 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of crizotinib in patients with tumors except non-small cell lung cancer that are positive for ALK.

Interventions

DRUGCrizotinib

Crizotinib tablets, 250 mg BID, will be administered orally on a continuous dosing schedule

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* histologically or cytologically proven diagnosis of malignancy other than NSCLC * positive for translocation or inversion event involving the ALK gene locus * positive for ALK amplification events * positive for ALK activating point mutations

Exclusion criteria

* mutations of amplifications involving the c-Met gene but not the ALK gene * concurrent treatment on another therapeutic clinical trial * prior therapy specifically directed against ALK

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks)An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care activity of daily living (ADL); Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.
Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationFrom the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication.Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsFrom the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks)Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationFrom the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks)Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks)Baseline assessment was defined as the last assessment performed on or prior to the date of the first dose of study treatment. Both hematology and clinical chemistry parameters were analyzed. Grades of severity were defined by CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1 = mild adverse event; Grade 2 = moderate adverse event; Grade 3= severe adverse event; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationFrom the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks)Baseline assessment was defined as the last assessment performed on or prior to the date of the first dose of study treatment. Both hematology and chemistry laboratory assessments were analyzed. Grades of severity were defined by CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1 = mild adverse event; Grade 2 = moderate adverse event; Grade 3= severe adverse event; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Unplanned laboratory test results were also included.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective ResponseFrom the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occured first (maximum 374 weeks)Percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (1.1) as determined by the investigators. CR = disappearance of all target lesions. PR = greater than equal to (\>=) 30% decrease in sum of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters. ORR based on Cheson criteria was defined similarly however, confirmation of response was not required. If participant had tumor response assessed only by RECIST or Cheson, then ORR was based on the single result. If tumor response was assessed by both RECIST and Cheson, then ORR was reported based on tumor response by Cheson criteria unless the Cheson has indeterminate result, in which case the RECIST result was reported. Participant(s) who did not have tumor assessment results from either RECIST 1.1 or Cheson criteria reported at baseline were to be excluded from the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsFrom Screening 28 Days Prior to Dosing Up to End of Treatment/Withdrawal (Maximum Up to Approximately 11 Years)Number of participants with ALK translocation/fusion, amplification, mutation and overexpression at baseline assessed by technologies including fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), ALK Fusion partners assessed by FISH or PCR; ALK gene amplification assessed by FISH or array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH), ALK Mutation assessed by PCR or direct sequencing were reported.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator AssessementFrom the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occurs first (maximum 444 weeks)PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression (at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study \[this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study\]). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered a sign of progression) or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. The median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Phosphorylation Status of ALK in the Tumor Samples From Surgery or Biopsy Pre and Post TreatmentFrom Screening 28 Days Prior to Dosing Up to End of Treatment/Withdrawal (Maximum Up to Approximately 11 Years)Tumor sample was planned to be provided to the designated central laboratory for retrospective confirmation of ALK phosphorylation status by a Pfizer designated central laboratory. The molecular profiling results were planned to include ALK fusion/translocation, mutations, amplification and overexpression.
Duration of Response (DR) Based on Investigator AssessementFrom the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum 374 weeks)DR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target lesions \[TLs\]) or non-target lesions (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of diameters; DR (in weeks) was calculated as (first date of PD or death - first date of CR or PR +1)/7. The median DR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 YearAt 6 months and 1 year after first doseThe probability of survival at 6 months and 1 year, respectively, after the date of the first dose based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Overall Survival (OS)From the first dose of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause (maximum 444 weeks)OS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death - date of first dose +1)/30.42. For participants still alive at the time of the analysis, for those who were lost to follow-up, and those who withdrew consent for additional follow up, the OS was censored on the last date that participants were known to be alive. Participants lacking data beyond the first dose had their OS censored at the date of first dose. The median OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Predose within 1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection.
Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Predose within 1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection.
Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Predose within -1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection. The ratio is calculated as: (PF-06260182 concentration/464.33)/(Crizotinib concentration/450.34), where 464.33 is molecular weight for PF-06260182 and 450.33 is molecular weight for Crizotinib.

Countries

China, Italy, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 44 Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) genetic event positive participants were enrolled into the study and treated: 17 with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), 9 with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMT), and 18 with other tumors (ALK-positive malignancies excluding non-small cell lung cancer).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ALCL Arm
In ALK genetic event positive participants with ALCL, crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (BID) was administered orally at approximately the same time each day on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Crizotinib was allowed to be taken without regard to meals. Cycles were defined in 21 day periods. Participants could have continued treatment with crizotinib on this study as long as there was evidence of clinical benefit in the judgment of the Investigator.
17
IMT Arm
In ALK genetic event positive participants with IMT, crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (BID) was administered orally at approximately the same time each day on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Crizotinib was allowed to be taken without regard to meals. Cycles were defined in 21 day periods. Participants could have continued treatment with crizotinib on this study as long as there was evidence of clinical benefit in the judgment of the Investigator.
9
Other Tumors
In ALK genetic event positive participants with other tumors (excluding non-small cell lung cancer), crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (BID) was administered orally at approximately the same time each day on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Crizotinib was allowed to be taken without regard to meals. Cycles were defined in 21 day periods. Participants could have continued treatment with crizotinib on this study as long as there was evidence of clinical benefit in the judgment of the Investigator.
18
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath5313
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up011
Overall StudyNon-Specified Reasons942
Overall StudyParticipant Refused Further Followup202
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicALCL ArmTotalOther TumorsIMT Arm
Age, Continuous
Overall Population
25.0 Years32.0 Years49.0 Years32.0 Years
Age, Continuous
Pediatric Population
15.0 Years16.0 Years16.5 Years
Age, Customized
<18
3 Participants5 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
0 Participants4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants35 Participants15 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asia
2 Participants4 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 Participants21 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
12 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Overall population
Female
5 Participants19 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Overall population
Male
12 Participants25 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Pediatric Population
Female
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Pediatric Population
Male
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 173 / 913 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 179 / 917 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 174 / 97 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication.Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks)

Population: Enrolled pediatric (\<18 years old) participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment2 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs3 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationSAEs2 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationMaximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs3 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationMaximum Grade 5 AEs0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study)0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in dose reduction1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment2 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationMaximum Grade 5 AEs0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs2 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in dose reduction0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationSAEs1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study)0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationMaximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care activity of daily living (ADL); Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs17 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs resulting in dose reduction4 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Maximum Grade 5 AEs2 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAEs8 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment8 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs13 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study)1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAEs4 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs7 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment6 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs9 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Maximum Grade 5 AEs0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study)0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs resulting in dose reduction1 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs17 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment10 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs resulting in dose reduction3 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study)3 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)SAEs7 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs8 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Maximum Grade 5 AEs4 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)

Baseline assessment was defined as the last assessment performed on or prior to the date of the first dose of study treatment. Both hematology and clinical chemistry parameters were analyzed. Grades of severity were defined by CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1 = mild adverse event; Grade 2 = moderate adverse event; Grade 3= severe adverse event; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks)

Population: Number analyzed = Number of participants with a postbaseline value during the study treatment for this outcome measure for each specified row.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)White blood cell decreased3 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hemoglobin increased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Lymphocyte count decreased1 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Lymphocyte count increased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Neutrophil count decreased8 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Platelet count decreased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Anemia1 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Alanine aminotransferase increased2 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Alkaline phosphatase increased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Aspartate aminotransferase increased4 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Blood bilirubin increased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Creatinine increased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypercalcemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hyperglycemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hyperkalemia2 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypermagnesemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypernatremia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypoalbuminemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypocalcemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypoglycemia2 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypokalemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypomagnesemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hyponatremia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypophosphatemia3 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypomagnesemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Anemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypercalcemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypernatremia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hemoglobin increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Blood bilirubin increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypokalemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Lymphocyte count decreased1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hyperglycemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hyponatremia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Lymphocyte count increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Aspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypoalbuminemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Neutrophil count decreased3 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hyperkalemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Creatinine increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Platelet count decreased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Alkaline phosphatase increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypophosphatemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)White blood cell decreased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypermagnesemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypocalcemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Alanine aminotransferase increased1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypoglycemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Alanine aminotransferase increased2 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Alkaline phosphatase increased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Aspartate aminotransferase increased1 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Blood bilirubin increased1 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypoglycemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Creatinine increased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hyponatremia2 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypercalcemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hyperglycemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypokalemia2 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hyperkalemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypophosphatemia1 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypermagnesemia1 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Anemia5 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hemoglobin increased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypernatremia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Lymphocyte count decreased4 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypomagnesemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Lymphocyte count increased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Neutrophil count decreased1 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypoalbuminemia2 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Platelet count decreased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)White blood cell decreased1 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)Hypocalcemia0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population

Baseline assessment was defined as the last assessment performed on or prior to the date of the first dose of study treatment. Both hematology and chemistry laboratory assessments were analyzed. Grades of severity were defined by CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1 = mild adverse event; Grade 2 = moderate adverse event; Grade 3= severe adverse event; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Unplanned laboratory test results were also included.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks)

Population: Enrolled pediatric (\<18 years old) participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had both baseline and post-baseline values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationLymphocyte count increased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAnemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAspartate aminotransferase increased1 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypophosphatemia1 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypermagnesemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationBlood bilirubin increased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypokalemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHyperkalemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationCreatinine increased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationNeutrophil count decreased2 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHyperglycemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypercalcemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHyponatremia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypoglycemia1 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationPlatelet count decreased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationLymphocyte count decreased1 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypocalcemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationWhite blood cell decreased2 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHemoglobin increased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypoalbuminemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAlanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypomagnesemia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypernatremia0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAlkaline phosphatase increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypermagnesemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHemoglobin increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationLymphocyte count decreased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationLymphocyte count increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationNeutrophil count decreased1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationPlatelet count decreased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationWhite blood cell decreased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAlanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAlkaline phosphatase increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationBlood bilirubin increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationCreatinine increased0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypercalcemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHyperglycemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHyperkalemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypernatremia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypoalbuminemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypocalcemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypoglycemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypokalemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypomagnesemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHyponatremia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypophosphatemia0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAnemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAnemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypernatremia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationWhite blood cell decreased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypomagnesemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypoalbuminemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationPlatelet count decreased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHemoglobin increased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypocalcemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationNeutrophil count decreased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypophosphatemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypoglycemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationLymphocyte count increased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHyponatremia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypercalcemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationCreatinine increased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypokalemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHyperglycemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationBlood bilirubin increased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationLymphocyte count decreased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHyperkalemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAlkaline phosphatase increased0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationHypermagnesemia0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric PopulationAlanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs

Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsSAEs5 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsMaximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs11 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study treatment)0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsMaximum Grade 5 AEs0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment6 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs16 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs resulting in dose reduction4 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study treatment)0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs8 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsSAEs3 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsMaximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs5 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsMaximum Grade 5 AEs0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs resulting in dose reduction1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment4 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study treatment)2 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs15 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment6 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsAEs resulting in dose reduction3 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsSAEs2 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsMaximum Grade 5 AEs2 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEsMaximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs6 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population

Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks)

Population: Enrolled pediatric (\<18 years old) participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationMaximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs2 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study treatment)0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationSAEs2 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in dose reduction1 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationMaximum Grade 5 AEs0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment1 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs3 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs2 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationSAEs1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationMaximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationMaximum Grade 5 AEs0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study treatment)0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric PopulationAEs resulting in dose reduction0 Participants
Primary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (1.1) as determined by the investigators. CR = disappearance of all target lesions. PR = greater than equal to (\>=) 30% decrease in sum of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters. ORR based on Cheson criteria was defined similarly however, confirmation of response was not required. If participant had tumor response assessed only by RECIST or Cheson, then ORR was based on the single result. If tumor response was assessed by both RECIST and Cheson, then ORR was reported based on tumor response by Cheson criteria unless the Cheson has indeterminate result, in which case the RECIST result was reported. Participant(s) who did not have tumor assessment results from either RECIST 1.1 or Cheson criteria reported at baseline were to be excluded from the analysis.

Time frame: From the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occured first (maximum 374 weeks)

Population: All participants who were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of study treatment, and had adequate baseline tumor assessment by either RECIST 1.1 or Cheson criteria.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ALCL ArmObjective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response56.3 Percentage of participants
IMT ArmObjective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response66.7 Percentage of participants
Other TumorsObjective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response16.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5

Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection. The ratio is calculated as: (PF-06260182 concentration/464.33)/(Crizotinib concentration/450.34), where 464.33 is molecular weight for PF-06260182 and 450.33 is molecular weight for Crizotinib.

Time frame: Predose within -1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5

Population: Number of Participants Analyzed = participants who were enrolled and treated, had at least 1 PK blood sample collected, and were evaluable for steady-state Ctrough analysis. Number Analyzed = participants evaluable for this OM and had Ctrough data on the specific day.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
ALCL ArmCtrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 3 Day 10.314 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26
ALCL ArmCtrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 2 Day 10.323 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.2
ALCL ArmCtrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 5 Day 10.326 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.3
IMT ArmCtrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 3 Day 10.226 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.4
IMT ArmCtrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 2 Day 10.249 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25
IMT ArmCtrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 5 Day 10.270 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.7
Other TumorsCtrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 2 Day 10.190 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 32.7
Other TumorsCtrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 5 Day 10.243 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28
Other TumorsCtrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 3 Day 10.126 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 108
Secondary

Duration of Response (DR) Based on Investigator Assessement

DR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target lesions \[TLs\]) or non-target lesions (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of diameters; DR (in weeks) was calculated as (first date of PD or death - first date of CR or PR +1)/7. The median DR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Time frame: From the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum 374 weeks)

Population: Participants enrolled and treated who had baseline tumor assessment result and had confirmed CR or PR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ALCL ArmDuration of Response (DR) Based on Investigator AssessementNA Weeks
IMT ArmDuration of Response (DR) Based on Investigator AssessementNA Weeks
Other TumorsDuration of Response (DR) Based on Investigator AssessementNA Weeks
Secondary

Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events

Number of participants with ALK translocation/fusion, amplification, mutation and overexpression at baseline assessed by technologies including fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), ALK Fusion partners assessed by FISH or PCR; ALK gene amplification assessed by FISH or array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH), ALK Mutation assessed by PCR or direct sequencing were reported.

Time frame: From Screening 28 Days Prior to Dosing Up to End of Treatment/Withdrawal (Maximum Up to Approximately 11 Years)

Population: The analysis planned to include all participant who had at least one dose of study treatment and at least one data of molecular profiling. Number Analyzed = participants who were enrolled and evaluable for this OM that had ALK genetic events at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK FISH2 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK Fusion Partner1 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK RT-PCR4 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK Gene Amplification0 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK IHC15 Participants
ALCL ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK Mutation0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK Mutation0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK FISH9 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK Gene Amplification0 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK IHC1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK Fusion Partner1 Participants
IMT ArmNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK RT-PCR0 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK Fusion Partner2 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK RT-PCR2 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK Mutation4 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK Gene Amplification3 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK FISH12 Participants
Other TumorsNumber of Participants With ALK Genetic EventsALK IHC3 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death - date of first dose +1)/30.42. For participants still alive at the time of the analysis, for those who were lost to follow-up, and those who withdrew consent for additional follow up, the OS was censored on the last date that participants were known to be alive. Participants lacking data beyond the first dose had their OS censored at the date of first dose. The median OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause (maximum 444 weeks)

Population: Enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ALCL ArmOverall Survival (OS)NA Months
IMT ArmOverall Survival (OS)NA Months
Other TumorsOverall Survival (OS)12.6 Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year

The probability of survival at 6 months and 1 year, respectively, after the date of the first dose based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate.

Time frame: At 6 months and 1 year after first dose

Population: Enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ALCL ArmPercentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year6 Months76.5 Percentage of participants
ALCL ArmPercentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year1 Year70.6 Percentage of participants
IMT ArmPercentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year6 Months100.0 Percentage of participants
IMT ArmPercentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year1 Year100.0 Percentage of participants
Other TumorsPercentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year6 Months52.9 Percentage of participants
Other TumorsPercentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year1 Year52.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Phosphorylation Status of ALK in the Tumor Samples From Surgery or Biopsy Pre and Post Treatment

Tumor sample was planned to be provided to the designated central laboratory for retrospective confirmation of ALK phosphorylation status by a Pfizer designated central laboratory. The molecular profiling results were planned to include ALK fusion/translocation, mutations, amplification and overexpression.

Time frame: From Screening 28 Days Prior to Dosing Up to End of Treatment/Withdrawal (Maximum Up to Approximately 11 Years)

Population: Analysis population included all participant who had at least one dose of study treatment and at least one data of molecular profiling at baseline and at end of treatment. Data were not collected due to that post-treatment tumor sample collection was optional per protocol and no participant had the post-treatment sample taken.

Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessement

PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression (at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study \[this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study\]). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered a sign of progression) or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. The median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occurs first (maximum 444 weeks)

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ALCL ArmProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator AssessementNA Months
IMT ArmProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator AssessementNA Months
Other TumorsProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessement1.4 Months
Secondary

Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5

Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection.

Time frame: Predose within 1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5

Population: Number of Participants Analyzed = participants who were enrolled and treated, had at least 1 PK blood sample collected, and were evaluable for steady-state Ctrough analysis. Number Analyzed = participants evaluable for this OM and had Ctrough data on the specific day.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
ALCL ArmSteady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 3 Day 185.4 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 88.2
ALCL ArmSteady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 2 Day 179.7 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 64.6
ALCL ArmSteady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 5 Day 181.7 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 96.8
IMT ArmSteady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 3 Day 141.7 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 147
IMT ArmSteady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 2 Day 168.2 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.4
IMT ArmSteady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 5 Day 171.9 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.2
Other TumorsSteady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 2 Day 154.6 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 123
Other TumorsSteady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 5 Day 191.7 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 68.7
Other TumorsSteady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 3 Day 150.5 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 566
Secondary

Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5

Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection.

Time frame: Predose within 1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5

Population: Number of Participants Analyzed = participants who were enrolled and treated, had at least 1 PK blood sample collected, and were evaluable for steady-state Ctrough analysis. Number Analyzed = participants evaluable for this OM and had Ctrough data on the specific day.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
ALCL ArmSteady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 3 Day 1316 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.4
ALCL ArmSteady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 2 Day 1270 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.2
ALCL ArmSteady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 5 Day 1244 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80
IMT ArmSteady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 3 Day 1179 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 92.1
IMT ArmSteady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 2 Day 1266 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42
IMT ArmSteady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 5 Day 1257 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.1
Other TumorsSteady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 2 Day 1233 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 101
Other TumorsSteady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 5 Day 1347 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 63.1
Other TumorsSteady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5Cycle 3 Day 1187 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 224

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026