Neoplasms Malignant
Conditions
Keywords
neoplasm malignant, lymphoma, neuroblastoma, Crizotinib, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ALK
Brief summary
This is a Phase 1 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of crizotinib in patients with tumors except non-small cell lung cancer that are positive for ALK.
Interventions
Crizotinib tablets, 250 mg BID, will be administered orally on a continuous dosing schedule
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* histologically or cytologically proven diagnosis of malignancy other than NSCLC * positive for translocation or inversion event involving the ALK gene locus * positive for ALK amplification events * positive for ALK activating point mutations
Exclusion criteria
* mutations of amplifications involving the c-Met gene but not the ALK gene * concurrent treatment on another therapeutic clinical trial * prior therapy specifically directed against ALK
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks) | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care activity of daily living (ADL); Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE. |
| Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication.Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks) | Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks) | Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE. |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks) | Baseline assessment was defined as the last assessment performed on or prior to the date of the first dose of study treatment. Both hematology and clinical chemistry parameters were analyzed. Grades of severity were defined by CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1 = mild adverse event; Grade 2 = moderate adverse event; Grade 3= severe adverse event; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks) | Baseline assessment was defined as the last assessment performed on or prior to the date of the first dose of study treatment. Both hematology and chemistry laboratory assessments were analyzed. Grades of severity were defined by CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1 = mild adverse event; Grade 2 = moderate adverse event; Grade 3= severe adverse event; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Unplanned laboratory test results were also included. |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | From the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occured first (maximum 374 weeks) | Percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (1.1) as determined by the investigators. CR = disappearance of all target lesions. PR = greater than equal to (\>=) 30% decrease in sum of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters. ORR based on Cheson criteria was defined similarly however, confirmation of response was not required. If participant had tumor response assessed only by RECIST or Cheson, then ORR was based on the single result. If tumor response was assessed by both RECIST and Cheson, then ORR was reported based on tumor response by Cheson criteria unless the Cheson has indeterminate result, in which case the RECIST result was reported. Participant(s) who did not have tumor assessment results from either RECIST 1.1 or Cheson criteria reported at baseline were to be excluded from the analysis. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | From Screening 28 Days Prior to Dosing Up to End of Treatment/Withdrawal (Maximum Up to Approximately 11 Years) | Number of participants with ALK translocation/fusion, amplification, mutation and overexpression at baseline assessed by technologies including fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), ALK Fusion partners assessed by FISH or PCR; ALK gene amplification assessed by FISH or array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH), ALK Mutation assessed by PCR or direct sequencing were reported. |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessement | From the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occurs first (maximum 444 weeks) | PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression (at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study \[this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study\]). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered a sign of progression) or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. The median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Phosphorylation Status of ALK in the Tumor Samples From Surgery or Biopsy Pre and Post Treatment | From Screening 28 Days Prior to Dosing Up to End of Treatment/Withdrawal (Maximum Up to Approximately 11 Years) | Tumor sample was planned to be provided to the designated central laboratory for retrospective confirmation of ALK phosphorylation status by a Pfizer designated central laboratory. The molecular profiling results were planned to include ALK fusion/translocation, mutations, amplification and overexpression. |
| Duration of Response (DR) Based on Investigator Assessement | From the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum 374 weeks) | DR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target lesions \[TLs\]) or non-target lesions (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of diameters; DR (in weeks) was calculated as (first date of PD or death - first date of CR or PR +1)/7. The median DR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. |
| Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year | At 6 months and 1 year after first dose | The probability of survival at 6 months and 1 year, respectively, after the date of the first dose based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | From the first dose of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause (maximum 444 weeks) | OS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death - date of first dose +1)/30.42. For participants still alive at the time of the analysis, for those who were lost to follow-up, and those who withdrew consent for additional follow up, the OS was censored on the last date that participants were known to be alive. Participants lacking data beyond the first dose had their OS censored at the date of first dose. The median OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Predose within 1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection. |
| Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Predose within 1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection. |
| Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Predose within -1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection. The ratio is calculated as: (PF-06260182 concentration/464.33)/(Crizotinib concentration/450.34), where 464.33 is molecular weight for PF-06260182 and 450.33 is molecular weight for Crizotinib. |
Countries
China, Italy, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Taiwan, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 44 Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) genetic event positive participants were enrolled into the study and treated: 17 with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), 9 with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMT), and 18 with other tumors (ALK-positive malignancies excluding non-small cell lung cancer).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| ALCL Arm In ALK genetic event positive participants with ALCL, crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (BID) was administered orally at approximately the same time each day on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Crizotinib was allowed to be taken without regard to meals. Cycles were defined in 21 day periods. Participants could have continued treatment with crizotinib on this study as long as there was evidence of clinical benefit in the judgment of the Investigator. | 17 |
| IMT Arm In ALK genetic event positive participants with IMT, crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (BID) was administered orally at approximately the same time each day on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Crizotinib was allowed to be taken without regard to meals. Cycles were defined in 21 day periods. Participants could have continued treatment with crizotinib on this study as long as there was evidence of clinical benefit in the judgment of the Investigator. | 9 |
| Other Tumors In ALK genetic event positive participants with other tumors (excluding non-small cell lung cancer), crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (BID) was administered orally at approximately the same time each day on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Crizotinib was allowed to be taken without regard to meals. Cycles were defined in 21 day periods. Participants could have continued treatment with crizotinib on this study as long as there was evidence of clinical benefit in the judgment of the Investigator. | 18 |
| Total | 44 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 5 | 3 | 13 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Non-Specified Reasons | 9 | 4 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Participant Refused Further Followup | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | ALCL Arm | Total | Other Tumors | IMT Arm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous Overall Population | 25.0 Years | 32.0 Years | 49.0 Years | 32.0 Years |
| Age, Continuous Pediatric Population | 15.0 Years | 16.0 Years | — | 16.5 Years |
| Age, Customized <18 | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Age, Customized >=65 years | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Age, Customized Between 18 and 65 years | 14 Participants | 35 Participants | 15 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asia | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 5 Participants | 21 Participants | 11 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 12 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Overall population Female | 5 Participants | 19 Participants | 10 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Overall population Male | 12 Participants | 25 Participants | 8 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Pediatric Population Female | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Pediatric Population Male | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 5 / 17 | 3 / 9 | 13 / 18 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 16 / 17 | 9 / 9 | 17 / 18 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 8 / 17 | 4 / 9 | 7 / 18 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication.Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks)
Population: Enrolled pediatric (\<18 years old) participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment | 2 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs | 3 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | SAEs | 2 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 3 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | Maximum Grade 5 AEs | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study) | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in dose reduction | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment | 2 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | Maximum Grade 5 AEs | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs | 2 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in dose reduction | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | SAEs | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study) | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care activity of daily living (ADL); Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks)
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs | 17 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs resulting in dose reduction | 4 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Maximum Grade 5 AEs | 2 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAEs | 8 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment | 8 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 13 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study) | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAEs | 4 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 7 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment | 6 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs | 9 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Maximum Grade 5 AEs | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study) | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs resulting in dose reduction | 1 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs | 17 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment | 10 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs resulting in dose reduction | 3 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study) | 3 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | SAEs | 7 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 8 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With All-Causality Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Maximum Grade 5 AEs | 4 Participants |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries)
Baseline assessment was defined as the last assessment performed on or prior to the date of the first dose of study treatment. Both hematology and clinical chemistry parameters were analyzed. Grades of severity were defined by CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1 = mild adverse event; Grade 2 = moderate adverse event; Grade 3= severe adverse event; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks)
Population: Number analyzed = Number of participants with a postbaseline value during the study treatment for this outcome measure for each specified row.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | White blood cell decreased | 3 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hemoglobin increased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Lymphocyte count decreased | 1 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Lymphocyte count increased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Neutrophil count decreased | 8 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Platelet count decreased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Anemia | 1 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 2 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Alkaline phosphatase increased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 4 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Blood bilirubin increased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Creatinine increased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypercalcemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hyperglycemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hyperkalemia | 2 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypermagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypernatremia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypoalbuminemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypocalcemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypoglycemia | 2 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypokalemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypomagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hyponatremia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypophosphatemia | 3 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypomagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Anemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypercalcemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypernatremia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hemoglobin increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Blood bilirubin increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypokalemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Lymphocyte count decreased | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hyperglycemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hyponatremia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Lymphocyte count increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypoalbuminemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Neutrophil count decreased | 3 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hyperkalemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Creatinine increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Platelet count decreased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Alkaline phosphatase increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypophosphatemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | White blood cell decreased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypermagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypocalcemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypoglycemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 2 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Alkaline phosphatase increased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 1 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Blood bilirubin increased | 1 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypoglycemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Creatinine increased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hyponatremia | 2 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypercalcemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hyperglycemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypokalemia | 2 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hyperkalemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypophosphatemia | 1 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypermagnesemia | 1 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Anemia | 5 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hemoglobin increased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypernatremia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Lymphocyte count decreased | 4 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypomagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Lymphocyte count increased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Neutrophil count decreased | 1 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypoalbuminemia | 2 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Platelet count decreased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | White blood cell decreased | 1 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) | Hypocalcemia | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population
Baseline assessment was defined as the last assessment performed on or prior to the date of the first dose of study treatment. Both hematology and chemistry laboratory assessments were analyzed. Grades of severity were defined by CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1 = mild adverse event; Grade 2 = moderate adverse event; Grade 3= severe adverse event; Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Unplanned laboratory test results were also included.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks)
Population: Enrolled pediatric (\<18 years old) participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had both baseline and post-baseline values.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Lymphocyte count increased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Anemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 1 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypophosphatemia | 1 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypermagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Blood bilirubin increased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypokalemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hyperkalemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Creatinine increased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Neutrophil count decreased | 2 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hyperglycemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypercalcemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hyponatremia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypoglycemia | 1 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Platelet count decreased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Lymphocyte count decreased | 1 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypocalcemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | White blood cell decreased | 2 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hemoglobin increased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypoalbuminemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypomagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypernatremia | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Alkaline phosphatase increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypermagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hemoglobin increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Lymphocyte count decreased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Lymphocyte count increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Neutrophil count decreased | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Platelet count decreased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | White blood cell decreased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Alkaline phosphatase increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Blood bilirubin increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Creatinine increased | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypercalcemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hyperglycemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hyperkalemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypernatremia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypoalbuminemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypocalcemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypoglycemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypokalemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypomagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hyponatremia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypophosphatemia | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Anemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Anemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypernatremia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | White blood cell decreased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypomagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypoalbuminemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Platelet count decreased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hemoglobin increased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypocalcemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Neutrophil count decreased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypophosphatemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypoglycemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Lymphocyte count increased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hyponatremia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypercalcemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Creatinine increased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypokalemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hyperglycemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Blood bilirubin increased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Lymphocyte count decreased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hyperkalemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Alkaline phosphatase increased | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Hypermagnesemia | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Results Shifted From Grade <=2 At Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 Postbaseline (Hematology and Chemistries) in the Pediatric Population | Alanine aminotransferase increased | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs
Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 444 weeks)
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | SAEs | 5 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 11 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study treatment) | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | Maximum Grade 5 AEs | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment | 6 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs | 16 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs resulting in dose reduction | 4 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study treatment) | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs | 8 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | SAEs | 3 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 5 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | Maximum Grade 5 AEs | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs resulting in dose reduction | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment | 4 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study treatment) | 2 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs | 15 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment | 6 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | AEs resulting in dose reduction | 3 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | SAEs | 2 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | Maximum Grade 5 AEs | 2 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs | Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 6 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population
Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsened in severity after the first dose of study medication. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death related to AE.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to 28 days after the last dose of study treatment (maximum 342 weeks)
Population: Enrolled pediatric (\<18 years old) participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 2 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study treatment) | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | SAEs | 2 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in dose reduction | 1 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | Maximum Grade 5 AEs | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment | 1 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs | 3 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in temporary discontinuation of study treatment | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs | 2 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | SAEs | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | Maximum Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | Maximum Grade 5 AEs | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in study treatment discontinuation (participant continued study treatment) | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs in the Pediatric Population | AEs resulting in dose reduction | 0 Participants |
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (1.1) as determined by the investigators. CR = disappearance of all target lesions. PR = greater than equal to (\>=) 30% decrease in sum of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum diameters. ORR based on Cheson criteria was defined similarly however, confirmation of response was not required. If participant had tumor response assessed only by RECIST or Cheson, then ORR was based on the single result. If tumor response was assessed by both RECIST and Cheson, then ORR was reported based on tumor response by Cheson criteria unless the Cheson has indeterminate result, in which case the RECIST result was reported. Participant(s) who did not have tumor assessment results from either RECIST 1.1 or Cheson criteria reported at baseline were to be excluded from the analysis.
Time frame: From the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occured first (maximum 374 weeks)
Population: All participants who were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of study treatment, and had adequate baseline tumor assessment by either RECIST 1.1 or Cheson criteria.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 56.3 Percentage of participants |
| IMT Arm | Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Other Tumors | Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 16.7 Percentage of participants |
Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5
Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection. The ratio is calculated as: (PF-06260182 concentration/464.33)/(Crizotinib concentration/450.34), where 464.33 is molecular weight for PF-06260182 and 450.33 is molecular weight for Crizotinib.
Time frame: Predose within -1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5
Population: Number of Participants Analyzed = participants who were enrolled and treated, had at least 1 PK blood sample collected, and were evaluable for steady-state Ctrough analysis. Number Analyzed = participants evaluable for this OM and had Ctrough data on the specific day.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 0.314 Ratio | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26 |
| ALCL Arm | Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 0.323 Ratio | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.2 |
| ALCL Arm | Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 0.326 Ratio | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.3 |
| IMT Arm | Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 0.226 Ratio | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.4 |
| IMT Arm | Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 0.249 Ratio | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25 |
| IMT Arm | Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 0.270 Ratio | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 27.7 |
| Other Tumors | Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 0.190 Ratio | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.7 |
| Other Tumors | Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 0.243 Ratio | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28 |
| Other Tumors | Ctrough Ratios of PF-06260182 to Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 0.126 Ratio | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 108 |
Duration of Response (DR) Based on Investigator Assessement
DR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. CR: disappearance of all lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (target lesions \[TLs\]) or non-target lesions (non-TLs) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm; normalization of tumor marker level for non-TLs; PR: \>=30% decrease in sum of diameter of all TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of diameters; DR (in weeks) was calculated as (first date of PD or death - first date of CR or PR +1)/7. The median DR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: From the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum 374 weeks)
Population: Participants enrolled and treated who had baseline tumor assessment result and had confirmed CR or PR.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Duration of Response (DR) Based on Investigator Assessement | NA Weeks |
| IMT Arm | Duration of Response (DR) Based on Investigator Assessement | NA Weeks |
| Other Tumors | Duration of Response (DR) Based on Investigator Assessement | NA Weeks |
Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events
Number of participants with ALK translocation/fusion, amplification, mutation and overexpression at baseline assessed by technologies including fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), ALK Fusion partners assessed by FISH or PCR; ALK gene amplification assessed by FISH or array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH), ALK Mutation assessed by PCR or direct sequencing were reported.
Time frame: From Screening 28 Days Prior to Dosing Up to End of Treatment/Withdrawal (Maximum Up to Approximately 11 Years)
Population: The analysis planned to include all participant who had at least one dose of study treatment and at least one data of molecular profiling. Number Analyzed = participants who were enrolled and evaluable for this OM that had ALK genetic events at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK FISH | 2 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK Fusion Partner | 1 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK RT-PCR | 4 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK Gene Amplification | 0 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK IHC | 15 Participants |
| ALCL Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK Mutation | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK Mutation | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK FISH | 9 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK Gene Amplification | 0 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK IHC | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK Fusion Partner | 1 Participants |
| IMT Arm | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK RT-PCR | 0 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK Fusion Partner | 2 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK RT-PCR | 2 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK Mutation | 4 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK Gene Amplification | 3 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK FISH | 12 Participants |
| Other Tumors | Number of Participants With ALK Genetic Events | ALK IHC | 3 Participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of death due to any cause. OS (in months) was calculated as (date of death - date of first dose +1)/30.42. For participants still alive at the time of the analysis, for those who were lost to follow-up, and those who withdrew consent for additional follow up, the OS was censored on the last date that participants were known to be alive. Participants lacking data beyond the first dose had their OS censored at the date of first dose. The median OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause (maximum 444 weeks)
Population: Enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Overall Survival (OS) | NA Months |
| IMT Arm | Overall Survival (OS) | NA Months |
| Other Tumors | Overall Survival (OS) | 12.6 Months |
Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year
The probability of survival at 6 months and 1 year, respectively, after the date of the first dose based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate.
Time frame: At 6 months and 1 year after first dose
Population: Enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year | 6 Months | 76.5 Percentage of participants |
| ALCL Arm | Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year | 1 Year | 70.6 Percentage of participants |
| IMT Arm | Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year | 6 Months | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| IMT Arm | Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year | 1 Year | 100.0 Percentage of participants |
| Other Tumors | Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year | 6 Months | 52.9 Percentage of participants |
| Other Tumors | Percentage of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 1 Year | 1 Year | 52.9 Percentage of participants |
Phosphorylation Status of ALK in the Tumor Samples From Surgery or Biopsy Pre and Post Treatment
Tumor sample was planned to be provided to the designated central laboratory for retrospective confirmation of ALK phosphorylation status by a Pfizer designated central laboratory. The molecular profiling results were planned to include ALK fusion/translocation, mutations, amplification and overexpression.
Time frame: From Screening 28 Days Prior to Dosing Up to End of Treatment/Withdrawal (Maximum Up to Approximately 11 Years)
Population: Analysis population included all participant who had at least one dose of study treatment and at least one data of molecular profiling at baseline and at end of treatment. Data were not collected due to that post-treatment tumor sample collection was optional per protocol and no participant had the post-treatment sample taken.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessement
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression (at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study \[this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study\]). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered a sign of progression) or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. The median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death on treatment due to any cause, whichever occurs first (maximum 444 weeks)
Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessement | NA Months |
| IMT Arm | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessement | NA Months |
| Other Tumors | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessement | 1.4 Months |
Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5
Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection.
Time frame: Predose within 1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5
Population: Number of Participants Analyzed = participants who were enrolled and treated, had at least 1 PK blood sample collected, and were evaluable for steady-state Ctrough analysis. Number Analyzed = participants evaluable for this OM and had Ctrough data on the specific day.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 85.4 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 88.2 |
| ALCL Arm | Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 79.7 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 64.6 |
| ALCL Arm | Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 81.7 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 96.8 |
| IMT Arm | Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 41.7 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 147 |
| IMT Arm | Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 68.2 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 56.4 |
| IMT Arm | Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 71.9 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 48.2 |
| Other Tumors | Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 54.6 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 123 |
| Other Tumors | Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 91.7 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68.7 |
| Other Tumors | Steady-State Ctrough for PF-06260182 on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 50.5 ng/mL | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 566 |
Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5
Ctrough is defined as the drug concentration observed at the last planned timepoint prior to dosing. Steady state is defined as the participant receiving at least 90% of Crizotinib 500 mg daily dosing 14 days prior to the PK sample collection.
Time frame: Predose within 1.2 hours before dosing on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5
Population: Number of Participants Analyzed = participants who were enrolled and treated, had at least 1 PK blood sample collected, and were evaluable for steady-state Ctrough analysis. Number Analyzed = participants evaluable for this OM and had Ctrough data on the specific day.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALCL Arm | Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 316 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.4 |
| ALCL Arm | Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 270 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.2 |
| ALCL Arm | Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 244 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80 |
| IMT Arm | Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 179 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 92.1 |
| IMT Arm | Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 266 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42 |
| IMT Arm | Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 257 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.1 |
| Other Tumors | Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 233 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 101 |
| Other Tumors | Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 347 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 63.1 |
| Other Tumors | Steady-State Pre-dose Concentration (Ctrough) for Crizotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3 and 5 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 187 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 224 |