Skip to content

Prospective Multicenter Trial to Compare Preformed vs Non Preformed Orbital Implants

A Prospective Multicenter Study to Compare the Accuracy of Posttraumatic Orbital Reconstruction of the Medial Orbital Wall and/or the Orbital Floor With Preoperatively Preformed Versus Non-preformed Orbital Plates

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01121159
Acronym
Orbita 3
Enrollment
185
Registered
2010-05-12
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2020-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Medial Orbital Wall Fracture, Orbital Floor Fracture

Brief summary

Accuracy of posttraumatic orbital reconstruction of the medial orbital wall and/or floor is better with preoperatively preformed orbital implants than with non-preformed orbital implants.

Interventions

PROCEDUREorbital fracture repair

All patients will receive orbital fracture repair with one of the 4 specified implants

Sponsors

AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients ≥ 18 years 2. Fracture (not older than 14 days) of the medial orbital wall and/or the orbital floor 3. Scheduled for reconstruction surgery with one of the following implants: * MatrixMIDFACE Preformed Orbital Plate * Custom-made orbital implant * Orbital Floor Mesh Plate * SynPOR Titanium Reinforced Fan Sheet 4. At least partial sight in both eyes before the accident 5. Willingness and ability to participate in the study follow-up according to the protocol 6. Ability to understand and read local language at elementary level 7. Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Bilateral orbital fracture 2. Fractures of the orbital roof 3. Comminuted zygoma fracture 4. More than one piece fracture of the intraorbital bone lateral to the inferior orbital fissure 5. Previous dislocated orbital fractures on either side 6. Vision or diplopia not assessable 7. Injury of the globe 8. Neurological diseases with influence on eye motility or sight 9. Legal incompetence 10. Active malignancy 11. Life-threatening condition 12. Alcohol and drug abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
shape and volume assessing softwareup to 3 days after surgeryA post-op CT or CBCT scan will be analyzed with specially developed software that can compare shape and volume of the reconstruced orbit to the uninjured orbit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
shape and volume assessing softwareup to 3 days after surgery6 specific points and regions in the orbit will be compared between the reconstructed and the non-affected orbit
Clinical tests to assess visionup to 3 days after surgery, 1 week after surgery, 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgeryGlobe position, visual acuity, bulbus motility and diplopia will be assessed with clinical tests
Rate of complicationsup to 3 days after surgery, 1 week after surgery, 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgeryComplications will be documented at every follow-up

Countries

Germany, Singapore, Spain, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026