Skip to content

XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System USA Post-Approval Study (XIENCE V® USA Long Term Follow-up Cohort)

XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (EECSS) USA Post-Approval Study (XIENCE V® USA Long Term Follow-up Cohort)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01120379
Acronym
XVU-LTF
Enrollment
5034
Registered
2010-05-10
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2015-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Coronary Occlusion, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenosis, Coronary Disease, Coronary Restenosis, Myocardial Ischemia, Vascular Disease

Keywords

drug eluting stents, Stents, Angioplasty, Stent thrombosis

Brief summary

XIENCE V USA is a prospective, multi-center, multi-cohort post-approval study. The objectives of this study are * To evaluate XIENCE V EECSS continued safety and effectiveness during commercial use in real world settings, and * To support the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) initiative. This initiative is designed to evaluate the composite of all death, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke (MACCE) and the survival of patients that are free from Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) and that have been treated with drug eluting stents (DES) and extended dual antiplatelet therapy.

Detailed description

Among patients enrolled in the XIENCE V USA who have completed Study Phase I, some will be eligible to participate in the XIENCE V USA Long Term Follow-up (LTF) Cohort. This LTF cohort is a prospective, open-label, multi-center, observational, single-arm study is designed to evaluate XIENCE V EECSS continued safety and effectiveness in real world settings from 1 year after the index procedure up to 5 years. The XIENCE V USA LTF cohort will consist of the following from the initial 5,000 patients: * The first 1,500 on-label patients who are treated in accordance with the XIENCE V EECSS Instruction for Use (IFU), and consecutively enrolled in the XIENCE V USA study * The remaining patients who do not participate in the HCRI-DAPT cohort * Data monitoring committee up to two years

Interventions

Single-arm study designed to evaluate XIENCE V® EECSS continued safety and effectiveness during commercial use in real world settings.

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient agrees to participate in this study by signing the Institutional Review Board approved informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* The inability to obtain an informed consent. * Age limit is determined by investigator. * There are no angiographic inclusion or

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stent Thrombosis (Definite and Probable) Rate as Defined by ARC (Academic Research Consortium)2 yearsStent thrombosis was defined by ARC criteria as definite (angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy), probable (any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause), and possible (any unexplained death from 30 days after intracoronary stenting until end of trial follow-up). Stent thrombosis was categorized as acute (0-24 hours post stent implantation), subacute (\>24 hours to 30 days post stent implantation), late (\>30 days to 1 year post stent implantation), or very late (\>1 year post stent implantation).
Stent Thrombosis (Definite and Probable) as Defined by ARC4 yearsStent thrombosis was defined by ARC criteria as definite (angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy), probable (any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause), and possible (any unexplained death from 30 days after intracoronary stenting until end of trial follow-up). Stent thrombosis was categorized as acute (0-24 hours post stent implantation), Subacute (\>24 hours to 30 days post stent implantation), late (\>30 days to 1 year post stent implantation), or very late (\>1 year post stent implantation).
Composite Rate of Cardiac Death and Any Myocardial Infarction [MI] (ARC Defined).2 years
Composite Rate of Cardiac Death and Any Myocardial Infarction (ARC Defined).3 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Death (Cardiac Death, Vascular Death, and Non-cardiovascular Death)2 years
Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)2 years
Revascularization (Target Lesion, Target Vessel [TVR], and Non-target Vessel) (PCI and CABG)2 years
Composite Rate of All Death and Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)2 years
Major Bleeding Complications (Site Reported)3 yearsMajor bleeding complications consisted of CEC-adjudicated TIMI major bleeding through 2-year follow-up and site reported major bleeding after 2 years.
Dual Antiplatelet Medication Usage2 yearsPatient is included if medications (both aspirin and thienopyridine) were taken for at least 1 day during the visit window. The visit window for 2-year visit is 688-772 days.
Major Bleeding Complications2 yearsMajor bleeding complications consisted of Clinical Events Committee (CEC)-adjudicated Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding through 2-year follow-up and site reported major bleeding after 2 years.
Composite Rate of All Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) and Any Repeat Revascularization (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [CABG]2 years
Composite Rate of Cardiac Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (PCI and CABG)2 years
Composite Rate of Cardiac Death and MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR) (PCI and CABG) (This Composite Endpoint is Also Denoted as TLF)2 years

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects are derived from the USA interventional cardiology population.

Pre-assignment details

8000 patients (5034 patients in initial enrollment phase and 2998 patients in second enrollment phase) were enrolled in XIENCE V USA trial. Out of these 5034 patients, 14 patients were transferred to the HCRI DAPT cohort, leaving 5020 in the XIENCE V USA LTF cohort.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
XV-LTF Cohort
XIENCE V® EECSS : Single-arm study designed to evaluate XIENCE V® EECSS continued safety and effectiveness during commercial use in real world settings.
5,020
Total5,020

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Four Year TimepointAny other reason for early termination217
Four Year TimepointDeath131
Four Year TimepointLost to Follow-up10
Four Year TimepointPhysician Decision5
Four Year TimepointWithdrawal by Subject5
One Year TimepointAny other reason for early termination5
One Year TimepointDeath108
One Year TimepointLost to Follow-up115
One Year TimepointPhysician Decision9
One Year TimepointWithdrawal by Subject41
Three Year TimepointAny other reason for early termination17
Three Year TimepointDeath120
Three Year TimepointLost to Follow-up43
Three Year TimepointPhysician Decision9
Three Year TimepointWithdrawal by Subject25
Two Year TimepointAny other reason for early termination4
Two Year TimepointDeath123
Two Year TimepointLost to Follow-up87
Two Year TimepointPhysician Decision12
Two Year TimepointWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicXV-LTF Cohort
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2495 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2525 Participants
Age, Continuous64.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.07
Region of Enrollment
United States
5020 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1564 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3456 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
883 / 4,852
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2,730 / 4,852

Outcome results

Primary

Composite Rate of Cardiac Death and Any Myocardial Infarction (ARC Defined).

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of Cardiac Death and Any Myocardial Infarction (ARC Defined).14.9 percentage of participants
Primary

Composite Rate of Cardiac Death and Any Myocardial Infarction (ARC Defined).

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of Cardiac Death and Any Myocardial Infarction (ARC Defined).11.7 percentage of participants
Primary

Composite Rate of Cardiac Death and Any Myocardial Infarction [MI] (ARC Defined).

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of Cardiac Death and Any Myocardial Infarction [MI] (ARC Defined).9.5 percentage of participants
Primary

Stent Thrombosis (Definite and Probable) as Defined by ARC

Stent thrombosis was defined by ARC criteria as definite (angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy), probable (any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause), and possible (any unexplained death from 30 days after intracoronary stenting until end of trial follow-up). Stent thrombosis was categorized as acute (0-24 hours post stent implantation), Subacute (\>24 hours to 30 days post stent implantation), late (\>30 days to 1 year post stent implantation), or very late (\>1 year post stent implantation).

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortStent Thrombosis (Definite and Probable) as Defined by ARC1.56 percentage of participants
Primary

Stent Thrombosis (Definite and Probable) Rate as Defined by ARC (Academic Research Consortium)

Stent thrombosis was defined by ARC criteria as definite (angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy), probable (any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause), and possible (any unexplained death from 30 days after intracoronary stenting until end of trial follow-up). Stent thrombosis was categorized as acute (0-24 hours post stent implantation), subacute (\>24 hours to 30 days post stent implantation), late (\>30 days to 1 year post stent implantation), or very late (\>1 year post stent implantation).

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortStent Thrombosis (Definite and Probable) Rate as Defined by ARC (Academic Research Consortium)1.05 percentage of participants
Primary

Stent Thrombosis (Definite and Probable) Rate as Defined by ARC (Academic Research Consortium)

Stent thrombosis was defined by ARC criteria as definite (angiographic confirmation with at least one of the following: acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest, new ischemic ECG changes that suggest acute ischemia or typical rise and fall of cardiac biomarkers OR pathological confirmation at autopsy or via examination of tissue retrieved following thrombectomy), probable (any unexplained death within the first 30 days or, regardless of the time after the index procedure, any MI related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation and in the absence of any other obvious cause), and possible (any unexplained death from 30 days after intracoronary stenting until end of trial follow-up). Stent thrombosis was categorized as acute (0-24 hours post stent implantation), Subacute (\>24 hours to 30 days post stent implantation), late (\>30 days to 1 year post stent implantation), or very late (\>1 year post stent implantation).

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortStent Thrombosis (Definite and Probable) Rate as Defined by ARC (Academic Research Consortium)1.18 percentage of participants
Secondary

Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortAny MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)7.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortAny MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)9.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortAny MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)11.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of All Death and Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of All Death and Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)19.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of All Death and Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of All Death and Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)15.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of All Death and Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of All Death and Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave)11.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of All Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) and Any Repeat Revascularization (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [CABG]

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of All Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) and Any Repeat Revascularization (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [CABG]34.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of All Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) and Any Repeat Revascularization (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [CABG]

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of All Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) and Any Repeat Revascularization (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [CABG]27.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of All Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) and Any Repeat Revascularization (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [CABG]

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of All Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) and Any Repeat Revascularization (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [CABG]22.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of Cardiac Death and MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR) (PCI and CABG) (This Composite Endpoint is Also Denoted as TLF)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of Cardiac Death and MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR) (PCI and CABG) (This Composite Endpoint is Also Denoted as TLF)13.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of Cardiac Death and MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR) (PCI and CABG) (This Composite Endpoint is Also Denoted as TLF)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of Cardiac Death and MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR) (PCI and CABG) (This Composite Endpoint is Also Denoted as TLF)15.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of Cardiac Death and MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR) (PCI and CABG) (This Composite Endpoint is Also Denoted as TLF)

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of Cardiac Death and MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization (CI-TLR) (PCI and CABG) (This Composite Endpoint is Also Denoted as TLF)19.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of Cardiac Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (PCI and CABG)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of Cardiac Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (PCI and CABG)16.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of Cardiac Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (PCI and CABG)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of Cardiac Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (PCI and CABG)13.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Composite Rate of Cardiac Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (PCI and CABG)

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortComposite Rate of Cardiac Death, Any MI (Q-wave and Non Q-wave) Attributed to the Target Vessel, and Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) (PCI and CABG)19.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Death (Cardiac Death, Vascular Death, and Non-cardiovascular Death)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortDeath (Cardiac Death, Vascular Death, and Non-cardiovascular Death)5.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Death (Cardiac Death, Vascular Death, and Non-cardiovascular Death)

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortDeath (Cardiac Death, Vascular Death, and Non-cardiovascular Death)10.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Death (Cardiac Death, Vascular Death, and Non-cardiovascular Death)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortDeath (Cardiac Death, Vascular Death, and Non-cardiovascular Death)7.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Dual Antiplatelet Medication Usage

Patient is included if medications (both aspirin and thienopyridine) were taken for at least 1 day during the visit window. The visit window for 4-year visit is 1502 days.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortDual Antiplatelet Medication Usage42.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Dual Antiplatelet Medication Usage

Patient is included if medications (both aspirin and thienopyridine) were taken for at least 1 day during the visit window. The visit window for 3-year visit is 1053-1137 days.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortDual Antiplatelet Medication Usage53.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Dual Antiplatelet Medication Usage

Patient is included if medications (both aspirin and thienopyridine) were taken for at least 1 day during the visit window. The visit window for 2-year visit is 688-772 days.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortDual Antiplatelet Medication Usage61.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Major Bleeding Complications

Major bleeding complications consisted of Clinical Events Committee (CEC)-adjudicated Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding through 2-year follow-up and site reported major bleeding after 2 years.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortMajor Bleeding Complications4.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Major Bleeding Complications

Major bleeding complications consisted of CEC-adjudicated TIMI major bleeding through 2-year follow-up and site reported major bleeding after 2 years.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortMajor Bleeding Complications8.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Major Bleeding Complications (Site Reported)

Major bleeding complications consisted of CEC-adjudicated TIMI major bleeding through 2-year follow-up and site reported major bleeding after 2 years.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortMajor Bleeding Complications (Site Reported)7.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Revascularization (Target Lesion, Target Vessel [TVR], and Non-target Vessel) (PCI and CABG)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortRevascularization (Target Lesion, Target Vessel [TVR], and Non-target Vessel) (PCI and CABG)18.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Revascularization (Target Lesion, Target Vessel [TVR], and Non-target Vessel) (PCI and CABG)

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortRevascularization (Target Lesion, Target Vessel [TVR], and Non-target Vessel) (PCI and CABG)22.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Revascularization (Target Lesion, Target Vessel [TVR], and Non-target Vessel) (PCI and CABG)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Number of participants analyzed excludes patients who are truly lost-to-follow-up, defined as patients who are lost to follow-up through given timepoint without any ARC Defined Patient-Oriented Endpoint (all death, all MI, all revascularization, respectively). Number of participants analyzed includes patients with valid data at the given timepoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
XV-LTF CohortRevascularization (Target Lesion, Target Vessel [TVR], and Non-target Vessel) (PCI and CABG)14.7 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026