Skip to content

HLA-Compatible Related or Unrelated Donors With CD34+ Enriched, T-cell Depleted Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Isolated by the CliniMACS System in the Treatment of Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

A Phase II Trial of Transplants From HLA-Compatible Related or Unrelated Donors With CD34+ Enriched, T-cell Depleted Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Isolated by the CliniMACS System in the Treatment of Patients With Hematologic Malignancies and Other Lethal Hematologic Disorders

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01119066
Enrollment
422
Registered
2010-05-07
Start date
2010-05-03
Completion date
2021-03-30
Last updated
2022-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Multiple Myeloma, Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Keywords

Leukemia, Multiple Myeloma, radiation, Thiotepa, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, Clofarabine, CliniMACS device, GCSF, 10-050

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find out the effects of using a system called CliniMACS to remove Tcells from blood stem cells. Removing T-cells may help stop a side effect called Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD). Some studies have been done with CliniMACS, but the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not yet approved it.

Interventions

RADIATIONtotal body irradiation

dose of 1375-1500 cGy

DRUGThiotepa

5 mg/kg/day x 2 or 10 mg/kg/day x 1

DRUGCyclophosphamide

60 mg/ kg/day x 2 (or fludarabine 25mg/m2 x 5 if cyclophosphamide is contraindicated).

DRUGBusulfan

0.8 mg/kg every 6 hours x 10 or 12 doses (depending on disease) with dose modified according to pharmacokinetics

DRUGMelphalan

70mg/m2/day x 2

DRUGFludarabine

25mg/m2/ day x 5

DRUGClofarabine

20mg/m2/ day x 5 (or, for children \<18 years of age, 30mg/m2/day x 5 if deemed suitable and with PI approval)

PROCEDURE(CliniMACS) T-cell depleted PBSC Transplant

Sponsors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Malignant conditions or other life threatening disorders correctable by transplant for which CD34+ selected, T-cell depleted allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is indicated such as: * AML in 1st remission - for patients whose AML does not have 'good risk' cytogenetic features (i.e. t 8;21, t15;17, inv 16). * Secondary AML in 1st remission * AML in 1st relapse or \> than or = to 2nd remission * ALL/CLL in 1st remission clinical or molecular features indicating a high risk for relapse; or ALL/CLL \> than or = to 2nd remission * CML failing to respond to or not tolerating Imatinib or dasatinib in first chronic phase of disease; CML in accelerated phase second chronic phase or in CR after accelerated phase or blast crisis. * Non-Hodgkins lymphoma with chemoresponsive disease in any of the following categories: 1. intermediate or high grade lymphomas who have failed to achieve a first CR or have relapsed following a 1st remission who are not candidates for autologous transplants. 2. any NHL in remission which is considered not curable with chemotherapy alone and not eligible/appropriate for autologous transplant. * Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS): RA//RARS/RCMD with high risk cytogenetic features or transfusion dependence as well as RAEB-1 and RAEB-2 and Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) evolved from MDS, who are not eligible for transplantation and/or unable to enroll onto protocol IRB 08-008. * Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: CMML-1 and CMML-2. * Multiple Myeloma with disease in the following categories: 1. Patients with relapsed multiple myeloma following autologous stem cell transplantation who have achieved at least partial response following additional chemotherapy. 2. Patients with high risk cytogenetics at diagnosis must have achieved a partial response following autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients must have complex karyotype, del17p, t4;14 and/or t14;16 by FISH and/or del13 by karyotyping. * Other rare lethal disorders of Hematopoiesis and Lymphopoiesis for which a T-cell depleted transplant is indicated (e.g. hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; refractory aplastic anemia or congenital cytopenias; non-SCID lethal genetic immunodeficiencies such as Wiskott Aldrich Syndrome, CD40 ligand deficiency, or ALPS, as well as refractory autoimmune cytopenias, PNH, metabolic storage diseases or heavily transfused congenital hemoglobinopathies). * Accrual to each treatment arm will include up to 30 standard risk and 30 poor risk patients (60 patients/treatment arm) except for Regimen D, which will include 30 patients/treatment arm, all of which will be poor risk by virtue of risks of relapse and/or transplant related mortality. * Standard risk patients will include eligible patients, as defined above, who are receiving transplants as treatment for MDS in RA//RARS/RCMD, AML in 1st or 2nd remission, ALL in 1st CR, NHL in 1st remission, MM in 1st remission, Very Good Partial Response, or 1st Partial Response or CML in the first chronic phase or 1st remission. * All other patients, including those with treatment related malignancies and/or those who have AML derived from MDS, will have received extensive prior chemo/radiotherapy and, therefore, will be considered to be at poor risk of conditioning and transplant related morbidities, and potentially transplant related mortality. Patients with life threatening non-malignant genetic and acquired disorders will also, by virtue of their history of, optional transfusions and/or infection be considered poor risk. Stopping rules for non-relapse related mortality in these heavily treated patients are, therefore, slightly less stringent than patients in the poor risk transplant groups. Stopping rules for the principal endpoints of graft failure and GvHD are the same for all groups. The following inclusion criteria are also required: * Patient's age includes from birth on to \< 70 years old. * Patients may be of either gender or any ethnic background. * Patients must have a Karnofsky (adult) or Lansky (pediatric) Performance Status \> or = to 70% * Patients must have adequate organ function measured by: Cardiac: asymptomatic or if symptomatic then LVEF at rest must be \> or = to 50% and must improve with exercise. Hepatic: \< 3x ULN AST and ≤ to 1.5 total serum bilirubin, unless there is congenital benign hyperbilirubinemia or if the hyperbilirubinemia is directly caused by the disease in which the patient is receiving a transplant (e.g. AML Chloroma obstructing the biliary tree). Patients with higher bilirubin levels due to causes other than active liver disease are also eligible with PI approval e.g. patients with PNH, Gilbert's disease or other hemolytic disorders. Renal: serum creatinine \< than or = to 1.2 mg/dl or if serum creatinine is outside the normal range, then CrCl \> 40 ml/min (measured or calculated/estimated) Pulmonary: asymptomatic or if symptomatic, DLCO \> or = to 50% of predicted (corrected for hemoglobin) * Each patient must be willing to participate as a research subject and must sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Female patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding * Active viral, bacterial or fungal infection * Patient seropositive for HIV-I/II; HTLV -I/II * Presence of leukemia in the CNS. Donor Inclusion Criteria: * Each donor must meet criteria outlined by institutional guidelines * Donor should agree to undergo general anesthesia and bone marrow harvest collection if PBSC yield is inadequate or otherwise not transplantable for whatever reason. Donor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.3 years
Number of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.3 yearsStandard BMT-CTN and IBMTR systems clinical criteria as defined by Rowlings, et al will be used to establish and grade acute GvHD. Chronic GvHD will be diagnosed and graded according to the criteria of Sullivan (CIBMTR).
Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.3 years
Survival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)at 6 months post transplant

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ Cells3 years
Correlation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With Engraftment3 years
Proportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD3+ (<1x10^5/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion of Patients Receiving CD3+ T-cell Doses > 1x10^5/kg.Up to 3 years

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

2 patients received 2 separate transplants on each Arm A and C

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and Cyclophosphamide
Hyperfractionated total body irradiation to a dose of 1375-1500 cGy (depending on age, stage of disease and requirement of general anesthesia) with lung shielding) Thiotepa (5 mg/kg/day x 2 or 10 mg/kg/day x 1) Cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/day x 2) (or fludarabine 25mg/m2 x 5 if cyclophosphamide is contraindicated) total body irradiation: dose of 1375-1500 cGy Thiotepa: 5 mg/kg/day x 2 or 10 mg/kg/day x 1 Cyclophosphamide: 60 mg/ kg/day x 2 (or fludarabine 25mg/m2 x 5 if cyclophosphamide is contraindicated). (CliniMACS) T-cell depleted PBSC Transplant
125
Busulfan, Melphalan and Fludarabine
Busulfan (0.8 mg/kg every 6 hours x 10 or 12 doses), (depending on disease) with dose modified according to pharmacokinetics Melphalan (70mg/m2/day x 2 ) Fludarabine (25mg/m2/ day x 5) Busulfan: 0.8 mg/kg every 6 hours x 10 or 12 doses (depending on disease) with dose modified according to pharmacokinetics Melphalan: 70mg/m2/day x 2 Fludarabine: 25mg/m2/ day x 5 (CliniMACS) T-cell depleted PBSC Transplant
213
Clofarabine, Melphalan and Thiotepa
Clofarabine (20mg/m2/ day x 5) (or, for children \<18 years of age, 30mg/m2/day x 5 if deemed suitable and with PI approval), Melphalan (70 mg/m2/day x 2) Thiotepa (5 mg/kg/day x 2 or 10mg/kg/day x1) Thiotepa: 5 mg/kg/day x 2 or 10 mg/kg/day x 1 Melphalan: 70mg/m2/day x 2 Clofarabine: 20mg/m2/ day x 5 (or, for children \<18 years of age, 30mg/m2/day x 5 if deemed suitable and with PI approval) (CliniMACS) T-cell depleted PBSC Transplant
52
Melphalan, Fludarabine and Thiotepa
Melphalan (70 mg/m2/day x 2) Fludarabine (25mg/m2/ day x 5 ) Thiotepa (5 mg/kg/day x 2 or 10mg/kg/day x1) Thiotepa: 5 mg/kg/day x 2 or 10 mg/kg/day x 1 Melphalan: 70mg/m2/day x 2 (CliniMACS) T-cell depleted PBSC Transplant
11
Total401

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyConcern regarding adequacy of transplant cell dose2100
Overall StudyIntercurrent medication condition rendered patient ineligible0300
Overall StudyRelapse identified before transplant1000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4600

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideTotalMelphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaClofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaBusulfan, Melphalan and Fludarabine
Age, Continuous30.3 years48 years10 years28.1 years57.6 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants38 Participants4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
64 Participants244 Participants5 Participants30 Participants145 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
43 Participants119 Participants2 Participants16 Participants58 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
9 Participants29 Participants2 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
13 Participants33 Participants2 Participants1 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants21 Participants1 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
94 Participants317 Participants6 Participants41 Participants176 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
125 Participants401 Participants11 Participants52 Participants213 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants180 Participants5 Participants21 Participants91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
62 Participants221 Participants6 Participants31 Participants122 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
42 / 12071 / 21018 / 473 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 12531 / 2139 / 523 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 12530 / 2139 / 523 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Please note 13 participants were not evaluated in the data set as they received a second or third HCT on protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Dead (non-relapse mortality)16 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Dead (not non-relapse mortality)23 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Alive81 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Dead (non-relapse mortality)41 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Dead (not non-relapse mortality)24 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Alive145 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Alive30 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Dead (not non-relapse mortality)3 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Dead (non-relapse mortality)14 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Alive8 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Dead (non-relapse mortality)3 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality (Transplant-related Mortality) Following Each Cytoreduction Regimen and a Transplant Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.Dead (not non-relapse mortality)0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.

Standard BMT-CTN and IBMTR systems clinical criteria as defined by Rowlings, et al will be used to establish and grade acute GvHD. Chronic GvHD will be diagnosed and graded according to the criteria of Sullivan (CIBMTR).

Time frame: 3 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.aGVHD II-IV34 participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.cGVHD, Extensive8 participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.cGVHD, Limited2 participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.aGVHD II-IV60 participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.cGVHD, Extensive1 participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.cGVHD, Limited4 participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.cGVHD, Limited1 participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.aGVHD II-IV10 participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.cGVHD, Extensive1 participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.aGVHD II-IV2 participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.cGVHD, Extensive1 participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaNumber of Participants With Acute and Chronic GVHD Following T-cell Depleted, CD34+ Progenitor Cell Enriched Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System.cGVHD, Limited0 participants
Primary

Survival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)

Time frame: 2 years post transplant

Population: 2 patients received 2 separate transplants on each Arm A and C

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival68.7 % of pts at 2 years
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease Free Survival58.9 % of pts at 2 years
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease Free Survival62.1 % of pts at 2 years
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival72.1 % of pts at 2 years
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival63.8 % of pts at 2 years
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease Free Survival59.6 % of pts at 2 years
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival71.6 % of pts at 2 years
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease Free Survival62.3 % of pts at 2 years
Primary

Survival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)

Time frame: at 6 months post transplant

Population: 2 patients received 2 separate transplants on each Arm A and C

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival93.3 percentage of participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease Free Survival82.5 percentage of participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease Free Survival89.0 percentage of participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival92.4 percentage of participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival87.2 percentage of participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease Free Survival85.1 percentage of participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival90.9 percentage of participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease Free Survival90.9 percentage of participants
Primary

Survival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)

Time frame: 1 year post transplant

Population: 2 patients received 2 separate transplants on each Arm A and C

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival80.8 % of pts at 1 year post transplant
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease free survival68.3 % of pts at 1 year post transplant
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease free survival73.7 % of pts at 1 year post transplant
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival83.8 % of pts at 1 year post transplant
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival85.1 % of pts at 1 year post transplant
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease free survival83.0 % of pts at 1 year post transplant
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Survival81.8 % of pts at 1 year post transplant
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaSurvival and Disease-free Survival (DFS)Disease free survival72.7 % of pts at 1 year post transplant
Primary

The Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Please note 13 participants were not evaluated in the data set as they received a second or third HCT on protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Engrafted118 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Primary Graft Failure0 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Late graft failure1 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Not Evaluable Engraftment1 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Primary Graft Failure0 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Late graft failure5 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Not Evaluable Engraftment0 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Engrafted205 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Late graft failure2 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Primary Graft Failure0 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Not Evaluable Engraftment0 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Engrafted45 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Not Evaluable Engraftment0 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Primary Graft Failure0 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Engrafted10 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaThe Incidence of Durable Hematopoietic Engraftment for T-cell Depleted Transplants Fractionated by the CliniMACS System Administered After Each of the Four Disease Targeted Cytoreduction Regimens.Late graft failure1 Participants
Secondary

Correlation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With Engraftment

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Please note 13 participants were not evaluated in the data set as they received a second or third HCT on protocol.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Late Graft Failure0 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Late Graft Failure1 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Not Evaluable0 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Engrafted15 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Not Evaluable0 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Not Evaluable1 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Engrafted103 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Engrafted0 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Late Graft Failure0 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Engrafted1 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Not Evaluable0 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Engrafted40 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Not Evaluable0 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Not Evaluable0 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Late Graft Failure5 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Late Graft Failure0 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Engrafted163 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Late Graft Failure0 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Not Evaluable0 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Engrafted38 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Late Graft Failure1 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Not Evaluable0 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Engrafted0 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Late Graft Failure0 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Not Evaluable0 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Engrafted7 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Late Graft Failure1 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Engrafted11 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Engrafted0 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Engrafted0 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Not Evaluable0 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Not Evaluable0 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOther(2-5X106/kg), Late Graft Failure0 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentOptimal (> 5x106/kg), Late Graft Failure0 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Not Evaluable0 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaCorrelation of Doses of CD34+ Progenitors and CD3+ T Cells With EngraftmentSuboptimal(< 2x106/kg), Late Graft Failure0 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD3+ (<1x10^5/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion of Patients Receiving CD3+ T-cell Doses > 1x10^5/kg.

Time frame: Up to 3 years

Population: 2 patients received 2 separate transplants on each Arm A and C. Please note 13 participants were not evaluated in the data set as they received a second or third HCT on protocol.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD3+ (<1x10^5/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion of Patients Receiving CD3+ T-cell Doses > 1x10^5/kg.CD3 Optimal120 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD3+ (<1x10^5/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion of Patients Receiving CD3+ T-cell Doses > 1x10^5/kg.CD3 Suboptimal0 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD3+ (<1x10^5/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion of Patients Receiving CD3+ T-cell Doses > 1x10^5/kg.CD3 Suboptimal0 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD3+ (<1x10^5/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion of Patients Receiving CD3+ T-cell Doses > 1x10^5/kg.CD3 Optimal210 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD3+ (<1x10^5/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion of Patients Receiving CD3+ T-cell Doses > 1x10^5/kg.CD3 Optimal47 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD3+ (<1x10^5/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion of Patients Receiving CD3+ T-cell Doses > 1x10^5/kg.CD3 Suboptimal0 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD3+ (<1x10^5/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion of Patients Receiving CD3+ T-cell Doses > 1x10^5/kg.CD3 Optimal11 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD3+ (<1x10^5/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion of Patients Receiving CD3+ T-cell Doses > 1x10^5/kg.CD3 Suboptimal0 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ Cells

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Please note 13 participants were not evaluated in the data set as they received a second or third HCT on protocol.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsNone15 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsSuboptimal0 Participants
Total Body Irradiation, Thiotepa and CyclophosphamideProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsOptimal105 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsOptimal169 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsNone40 Participants
Busulfan, Melphalan and FludarabineProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsSuboptimal1 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsSuboptimal0 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsOptimal39 Participants
Clofarabine, Melphalan and ThiotepaProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsNone8 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsOptimal11 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsNone0 Participants
Melphalan, Fludarabine and ThiotepaProportion of Patients Receiving Optimal CD34+ (> 5x10^6/kg) Cell Doses the Proportion Recurring Suboptimal Doses (< 2x10^6/kg) CD34+ CellsSuboptimal0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026