Skip to content

Open-Label Study to Assess Lacosamide Safety as Add-on Therapy for Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Subjects With Epilepsy

An Open-Label Pilot Study to Assess the Safety of Oral Lacosamide as Adjunctive Therapy for Uncontrolled Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Subjects With Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01118949
Enrollment
49
Registered
2010-05-07
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2018-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Keywords

Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic (PGTC) Seizures, Absence Seizures, Myoclonic Seizures, Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy (IGE)

Brief summary

The purpose is to assess the safety of Lacosamide in subjects with uncontrolled Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic (PGTC) seizures with Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy.

Interventions

DRUGLacosamide

Lacosamide is supplied as 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, and 200 mg tablets. Subjects will begin a Dose-Titration Phase of Lacosamide at 100 mg/day (50 mg bid, approx. 12 hours apart, once in the morning and once in the evening) for 1 week. Three (3) weekly increases will follow until the subject reaches a dosage of 200 mg/day, 300 mg/day, or 400 mg/day, as deemed clinically appropriate. The final titration will be followed by a 6-week Maintenance Phase. Subjects who complete the Maintenance Phase have the opportunity to enroll in an open-label extension study; those who do not enroll will begin a 3-week End-of-Study Phase when Lacosamide will be tapered off gradually at a recommended rate of 200 mg/day/week.

Sponsors

UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has a diagnosis of uncontrolled epilepsy with primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures and idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Diagnosis should have been established by an electroencephalogram (EEG) with generalized spike-wave discharges within 5 years of the screening visit * Subject has ≥1 PGTC seizure within the 12 weeks prior to the screening visit * Subject has a stable dose regimen of 1 to 3 marketed antiepileptic drug(s) (AEDs) with or without additional concurrent stable Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS). The VNS must have been in place for at least 6 months prior to study entry with constant settings for at least 28 days prior to the screening visit and during the Baseline Phase. Benzodiazepines will be counted as an AED

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has a history of partial-onset seizures or EEG findings consistent with partial onset seizures * Subject has a history of status epilepticus within the 5-year Period prior to Visit 1 * Subject has a current or previous diagnosis of pseudoseizures, conversion disorders, or other non-epileptic ictal events * Subject has any medical or psychiatric condition * Subject has any history of alcohol or drug abuse * Subject is currently taking felbamate * Subject has ever taken vigabatrin and has no visual fields examination report available or if results of the examination are abnormal * Subject is on a ketogenic diet * Subject has a known sodium channelopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Number of Seizure Days With Absence Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance PhaseFrom Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13)During the study subjects kept a diary to record daily seizure activity from Visit 1 until the end of study participation. The following information has been recorded: * Seizure type * Seizure frequency A negative value in change of seizure days with absence seizures shows a decrease in seizure days with absence seizures.
Change in the Number of Seizure Days With Myoclonic Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance PhaseFrom Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13)During the study subjects kept a diary to record daily seizure activity from Visit 1 until the end of study participation. The following information has been recorded: * Seizure type * Seizure frequency A negative value in change of seizure days with myoclonic seizures shows a decrease in seizure days with myoclonic seizures.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Count of Generalized Spike-wave Discharges on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase)From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8)Subjects were asked to return to the clinic on the morning of the day prior to Visit 2 and Visit 6 to begin 24-hour ambulatory EEG recordings for evaluation of spike-wave discharges. Only subjects with an evaluable EEG measurement with \> 19 interpretable hours at Visit 2 and Visit 6 are included in this analysis. The general spike-wave discharges are calculated per interpretable hours.
Changes in Count of 3 Hertz (Hz) Spike-wave Discharges (During Waking Hours) on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase)From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8)Subjects were asked to return to the clinic on the morning of the day prior to Visit 2 and Visit 6 to begin 24-hour ambulatory EEG recordings for evaluation of spike-wave discharges. Only subjects with an evaluable EEG measurement with \> 19 interpretable hours at Visit 2 and Visit 6 are included in this analysis. The 3 Hertz (Hz) spike-wave discharges are calculated per awake hours.
Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment PeriodFrom Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13)An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Number of Subjects Withdrawn From the Study Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment PeriodFrom Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13)An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Safety Set (SS) includes all enrolled subjects who took at least 1 dose of Lacosamide (LCM).

Pre-assignment details

Participant Flow and Baseline Characteristics refer to the Safety Set (SS).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lacosamide
Lacosamide is supplied as 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, and 200 mg tablets. Subjects will begin a Dose-Titration Phase of Lacosamide at 100 mg/day (50 mg bid, approx. 12 hours apart, once in the morning and once in the evening) for 1 week. Three (3) weekly increases will follow until the subject reaches a dosage of 200 mg/day, 300 mg/day, or 400 mg/day, as deemed clinically appropriate. The final titration will be followed by a 6-week Maintenance Phase. Subjects who complete the Maintenance Phase have the opportunity to enroll in an open-label extension study; those who do not enroll will begin a 3-week End-of-Study Phase when Lacosamide will be tapered off gradually at a recommended rate of 200 mg/day/week.
49
Total49

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event5
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLacosamide
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
3 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
46 Participants
Age, Continuous29.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Height168.08 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.32
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants
Weight77.90 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
39 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

Change in the Number of Seizure Days With Absence Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance Phase

During the study subjects kept a diary to record daily seizure activity from Visit 1 until the end of study participation. The following information has been recorded: * Seizure type * Seizure frequency A negative value in change of seizure days with absence seizures shows a decrease in seizure days with absence seizures.

Time frame: From Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13)

Population: Of the 49 subjects in the Safety Set (SS), 44 are included in this analysis. Data not available for 5 subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideChange in the Number of Seizure Days With Absence Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance Phase-0.37 number of seizure daysStandard Deviation 4.8
Primary

Change in the Number of Seizure Days With Myoclonic Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance Phase

During the study subjects kept a diary to record daily seizure activity from Visit 1 until the end of study participation. The following information has been recorded: * Seizure type * Seizure frequency A negative value in change of seizure days with myoclonic seizures shows a decrease in seizure days with myoclonic seizures.

Time frame: From Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13)

Population: Of the 49 subjects in the Safety Set (SS), 44 are included in this analysis. Data not available for 5 subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideChange in the Number of Seizure Days With Myoclonic Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance Phase-2.19 number of seizure daysStandard Deviation 5.8
Secondary

Changes in Count of 3 Hertz (Hz) Spike-wave Discharges (During Waking Hours) on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase)

Subjects were asked to return to the clinic on the morning of the day prior to Visit 2 and Visit 6 to begin 24-hour ambulatory EEG recordings for evaluation of spike-wave discharges. Only subjects with an evaluable EEG measurement with \> 19 interpretable hours at Visit 2 and Visit 6 are included in this analysis. The 3 Hertz (Hz) spike-wave discharges are calculated per awake hours.

Time frame: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8)

Population: Of the 49 subjects in the Safety Set (SS), 40 subjects are included in this analysis. Data not available for 9 subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideChanges in Count of 3 Hertz (Hz) Spike-wave Discharges (During Waking Hours) on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase)0.13 1/hourStandard Deviation 2.17
Secondary

Changes in Count of Generalized Spike-wave Discharges on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase)

Subjects were asked to return to the clinic on the morning of the day prior to Visit 2 and Visit 6 to begin 24-hour ambulatory EEG recordings for evaluation of spike-wave discharges. Only subjects with an evaluable EEG measurement with \> 19 interpretable hours at Visit 2 and Visit 6 are included in this analysis. The general spike-wave discharges are calculated per interpretable hours.

Time frame: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8)

Population: Of the 49 subjects in the Safety Set (SS), 40 subjects are included in this analysis. Data not available for 9 subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LacosamideChanges in Count of Generalized Spike-wave Discharges on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase)-3.47 1/hourStandard Deviation 55.85
Secondary

Number of Subjects Withdrawn From the Study Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment Period

An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Time frame: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13)

Population: All 49 subjects in the Safety Set (SS) are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LacosamideNumber of Subjects Withdrawn From the Study Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment Period5 participants
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment Period

An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Time frame: From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13)

Population: All 49 subjects in the Safety Set (SS) are included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LacosamideNumber of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment Period43 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026