Skip to content

Plasma Volume Replacement (PVR) Therapy With Colloid and Crystalloid Solutions

Prospective, Controlled, Double-blind, Randomized Multi-centric Study on the Efficacy and Safety of a Target Controlled PVR Therapy With a Hyperoncotic Balanced Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) Solution Versus an Isooncotic Balanced HES Solution Compared to a Balanced Electrolyte Solution in Elective Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01117649
Enrollment
63
Registered
2010-05-05
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2016-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plasma Volume Replacement, Surgery of the Pancreatic Head

Keywords

PVR, HES 130, pancreatic head, goal-directed, intraoperative PVR in elective surgery of the pancreatic head

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of target controlled fluid therapy with a hyper-oncotic balanced HES solution compared to an iso-oncotic HES solution in patients undergoing elective surgery of the pancreatic head. A third group receiving a balanced electrolyte solution (without colloidal volume replacement) will serve as a control for descriptive analysis.

Interventions

DRUGHES 10%

HES 10% dissolved in plasma adapted Ringer's solution (balanced solution).

DRUGHES 6%

HES 6% dissolved in plasma adapted Ringer's solution (balanced solution)

plasma adapted Ringer's solution

Sponsors

B. Braun Melsungen AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion: * patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery of the pancreatic head * patients who are willing to give of voluntary consent to participate in the study, following a full explanation of the nature and purpose of the study, by signing the informed consent form approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) prior to all evaluations. Exclusion: * patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class \> III * heart failure defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class\>2 * aneurysm of the ascending and thoracic aorta * patients with Zenker's diverticle * local oesophageal disease (oesophageal stricture, oesophageal varices, previous oesophageal surgery in past 6 months before study inclusion, pharyngeal pouch) * patients receiving haemodialysis * patients with known bleeding diatheses * any bleeding disorder known from patient's history * patients with a haematocrit \<= 25% despite pre-operative transfusion * renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 130 µmol/l or \>1.5 mg/dl) or oliguria or anuria * impaired hepatic function defined as Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) \> 10 or liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh B or C * additional contra-indications for investigational products

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First endpoint: Intraoperatively required amount of HES (10%, 6%) (ml)up to 8 hoursGoal-directed (stroke volume) plasma volume therapy
Second endpoint: Time until fully on oral (solid) diet (days)up to 15 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
haemodynamics, arterial blood gas analysis, laboratory data, postoperative nausea and vomiting, adverse events, nursing delirium screening scale, several injury scoresup to 7 days

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026