Skip to content

Role PET Imaging in Response Assessment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Role PET Imaging in Response Assessment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01116804
Enrollment
36
Registered
2010-05-05
Start date
2010-06-16
Completion date
2020-01-20
Last updated
2022-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Liver Cancer

Keywords

Primary liver cancer

Brief summary

Present imaging modalities for primary liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma or HCC) have several shortcomings. One important shortcoming is the time delay between successful treatment and radiological confirmation of this response. Often it takes several months for anatomical changes to occur and to be appreciated on morphological imaging such as CT or MRI (shrinkage of tumor, absence of contrast enhancement). Functional imaging by means of Fluor-18 deoxyglucose or Fluor-18 Choline (positron emitters, PET-scan) might be an early indicator of response. This early information might help to tailor treatment. For instance, if no response is induced, an early switch in therapy can be planned. The present study investigates whether the routine PET-tracer (Fluor-18 deoxyglucose) and the experimental PET-tracer, Fluor-18 Choline help to predict response if a patient with inoperable primary liver cancer is treated (radionuclide therapy, biologicals).

Interventions

PROCEDUREMRI of the liver before start of treatment

MRI of the liver as classic work out of patients (CT-scan if MRI is contra-indicated)

PROCEDUREMRI after treatment

MRI of the liver after 3 - 6 months of treatment (CT-scan if MRI is contra-indicated)

PROCEDUREPET-scan before treatment start

PET-scan with 2 tracers is performed before treatment start

PROCEDUREPET scan after treatment

PET-scan with 2 tracers is repeated 4 weeks following start of treatment

Sponsors

University Ghent
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Male and female are eligible -\>18years of age.No upper age limit. * not pregnant or breastfeeding * capable of understanding the study goals and protocol and to sign the informed consent. * Patients are diagnosed with primary liver cancer and referred for treatment with biologicals such as Sorafenib or treatment with radionuclides.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the efficacy of PET-imaging versus classic response assessment (MRI, CT-scam) in patients with inoperable liver cancer6 months after start of treatment

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026