Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Adult Chinese Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter, Efficacy and Safety Study of Adalimumab in Adult Chinese Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01114880
Enrollment
344
Registered
2010-05-03
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2011-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Keywords

ankylosing spondylitis, China

Brief summary

Study of the efficacy and safety of adalimumab compared with placebo in adult Chinese participants with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have had an inadequate response to or who are intolerant to one or more nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

Detailed description

Adults with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive treatment with adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow) or matching placebo, given subcutaneously (SC), in the 12-week double-blind (DB) phase. Randomized participants received one SC injection of the appropriate DB study medication (adalimumab 40 mg or matching placebo) at Week 0 and then eow until Week 10. Participants who completed the DB phase could enter the 12-week open-label (OL) phase, during which all participants received treatment with adalimumab 40 mg eow, starting at Weeks 12 through 22. No study drug was administered or injected at the final study visit (Week 24). A follow-up visit occurred 70 days after the last dose of study drug (in DB or OL phases) to obtain information on any ongoing or new adverse events (AEs).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALadalimumab

Prefilled syringe, 40 mg/0.8 mL administered subcutaneously every other week

OTHERplacebo

Prefilled syringe, matching placebo administered subcutaneously every other week

Sponsors

Abbott
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 through 65 years * Has a diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) based on the Modified New York Criteria * Has active AS, as defined by fulfillment of at least 2 of the following 3 conditions at both Screening and Baseline visits: * BASDAI score at least 4 cm * Total back pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) at least 40 mm * Morning stiffness at least 1 hr * Has inadequate response to or intolerance to one or more non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as defined by the Investigator

Exclusion criteria

* Has total spinal ankylosis (bamboo spine) * Has undergone spinal surgery or joint surgery involving joints assessed within 2 months prior to Baseline * Has extra-articular manifestations (i.e., psoriasis, uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease) that is not clinically stable, as defined by the Investigator's best clinical judgment, for at least 28 days prior to Baseline * Has received intra-articular joint injection(s), spinal or paraspinal injection(s) with corticosteroids within 28 days prior to Baseline * Has prior exposure to any biologic therapy with potential therapeutic impact on AS, including anti-TNF (tumor necrosis factor) therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Meeting the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) ASAS20 Response CriteriaWeek 12ASAS20 responder had improvement of 20% or more and absolute improvement of at least 10 units (on a scale of 0 \[least\] to 100 \[worst\]) from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 4 domains, with absence of deterioration (change for worse of at least 20% and net worsening of at least 10 units) in the potential remaining domain: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI); and Inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Meeting the ASAS40 Response CriteriaWeek 12An ASAS40 responder had improvement of 40% or more and absolute improvement of 20 units or more (on a scale of 0 \[least\] to 100 \[worst\]) from Baseline in at least 3 of the 4 domains identified above for the ASAS20. In addition, there must have been an absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain, where deterioration was defined as a net worsening of greater than 0 units (on a scale of 0 to 100).
Number of Participants Meeting the ASAS5/6 Response CriteriaWeek 12An ASAS5/6 responder had an improvement from Baseline of 20% or more in 5 of the following 6 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; pain as measured by the Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); function as measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI); inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores); spinal mobility (lateral lumbar flexion from Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index \[BASMI\]); and acute phase reactant (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein).
Number of Participants With ASAS Partial RemissionWeek 12Participants were classified as having achieved ASAS partial remission if they had a value of less than 20 on a scale from 0 (normal/none) to 100 (most severe) in each of 4 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; pain as measured by the Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); function as measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI); and inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores).
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease ActivityBaseline and Week 12Participants assessed their disease activity during the preceding week using a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale, with responses ranging from no activity (0) to severe activity (100).
Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain ScoreBaseline and Week 12Participants assessed their total back pain within the preceding week using a total back pain 100 mm visual analog scale, with responses ranging from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100).
Number of Participants Meeting the ASAS20 Response CriteriaWeek 24ASAS20 responder had improvement of 20% or more and absolute improvement of at least 10 units (on a scale of 0 \[least\] to 100 \[worst\]) from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 4 domains, with absence of deterioration (change for worse of at least 20% and net worsening of at least 10 units) in the potential remaining domain: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI); and Inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores).
Change From Baseline in Inflammation ScoreBaseline and Week 12The Inflammation score is the mean of the 10-cm visual analog scale scores from the 2 morning stiffness-related BASDAI questions: How would you describe the overall level of morning stiffness you have had from the time you wake up?, with response ranging from none to very severe; and How long does your morning stiffness last from the time you wake up?, with response ranging from 0 hours to 2 or more hours.
Number of Participants Meeting the Bath Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) BASDAI50 Response CriteriaWeek 12A BASDAI50 responder had at least a 50% improvement from Baseline in BASDAI score. In the BASDAI, participants use a 10-centimeter visual analog scale to answer 6 questions pertaining to symptoms experienced in the preceding week (e.g., How would you describe the overall level of fatigue/tiredness you have experienced? How long does your morning stiffness last from the time you wake up?) Responses range from none to very severe or from 0 hours to 2 or more hours for morning stiffness. The score is calculated as 0.2 (Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4 + Q5/2 + Q6/2).
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)Baseline and Week 12Elevation of hs-CRP is a nonspecific marker of inflammation. Values above 5 milligrams/liter (mg/L) were considered abnormally high. Decrease in level of hs-CRP indicates reduction in inflammation.
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Questionnaire Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary ScoreBaseline and Week 12The SF-36 questionnaire, version 2, consists of 36 general health questions with 2 components, physical and mental. For each component, a transformed summary score is calculated using 8 sub-domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better health state.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) ScoreBaseline and Week 12Participants assessed their ability to perform 10 selected activities (e.g., putting on socks or tights without help or aids, bending forward from the waist to pick up a pen from the floor without an aid) during the preceding week. Responses ranged from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible). The BASFI score is the average of the 10 responses and has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 100.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Adalimumab
Blinded adalimumab from Week 0 to Week 10, open-label adalimumab from Week 12 to Week 22
229
Placebo
Blinded placebo from Week 0 to Week 10, open-label adalimumab from Week 12 to Week 22
115
Total344

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1 (Week 0 to Week 12)Adverse Event40
Period 1 (Week 0 to Week 12)Lost to Follow-up01
Period 1 (Week 0 to Week 12)Poor subject compliance01
Period 1 (Week 0 to Week 12)Withdrawal by Subject10
Period 2 (Week 12 to Week 24)Adverse Event30
Period 2 (Week 12 to Week 24)Lost to Follow-up02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdalimumabPlaceboTotal
Age Continuous30.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.73
29.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.49
29.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.33
Region of Enrollment
China
229 participants115 participants344 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants20 Participants64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
185 Participants95 Participants280 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
55 / 22916 / 11532 / 22422 / 113
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 2291 / 1153 / 2241 / 113

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Meeting the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) ASAS20 Response Criteria

ASAS20 responder had improvement of 20% or more and absolute improvement of at least 10 units (on a scale of 0 \[least\] to 100 \[worst\]) from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 4 domains, with absence of deterioration (change for worse of at least 20% and net worsening of at least 10 units) in the potential remaining domain: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI); and Inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Analysis was performed on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analysis set, which included all subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug. A non-responder (NRI) imputation was used in which a missing response was imputed as non-response.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adalimumab/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) ASAS20 Response Criteria154 participants
Placebo/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) ASAS20 Response Criteria35 participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Questionnaire Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score

The SF-36 questionnaire, version 2, consists of 36 general health questions with 2 components, physical and mental. For each component, a transformed summary score is calculated using 8 sub-domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set, observed cases

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Questionnaire Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.43
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Questionnaire Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.31
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Questionnaire Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score

The SF-36 questionnaire, version 2, consists of 36 general health questions with 2 components, physical and mental. For each component, a transformed summary score is calculated using 8 sub-domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set, observed cases

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Questionnaire Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score8.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.44
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Questionnaire Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score9.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.25
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Score

Participants assessed their ability to perform 10 selected activities (e.g., putting on socks or tights without help or aids, bending forward from the waist to pick up a pen from the floor without an aid) during the preceding week. Responses ranged from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible). The BASFI score is the average of the 10 responses and has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 100.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Score-17.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.18
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Score-4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Score

Participants assessed their ability to perform 10 selected activities (e.g., putting on socks or tights without help or aids, bending forward from the waist to pick up a pen from the floor without an aid) during the preceding week. Responses ranged from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible). The BASFI score is the average of the 10 responses and has a possible minimum value of 0 and a possible maximum value of 100.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Score-23.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.03
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Score-20.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.51
Secondary

Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)

Elevation of hs-CRP is a nonspecific marker of inflammation. Values above 5 milligrams/liter (mg/L) were considered abnormally high. Decrease in level of hs-CRP indicates reduction in inflammation.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)-17.8 milligrams/literStandard Deviation 23.76
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)-4.2 milligrams/literStandard Deviation 21.23
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)

Elevation of hs-CRP is a nonspecific marker of inflammation. Values above 5 milligrams/liter (mg/L) were considered abnormally high. Decrease in level of hs-CRP indicates reduction in inflammation.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)-18.2 milligrams/literStandard Deviation 24.27
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)-20.1 milligrams/literStandard Deviation 30.63
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Inflammation Score

The Inflammation score is the mean of the 10-cm visual analog scale scores from the 2 morning stiffness-related BASDAI questions: How would you describe the overall level of morning stiffness you have had from the time you wake up?, with response ranging from none to very severe; and How long does your morning stiffness last from the time you wake up?, with response ranging from 0 hours to 2 or more hours.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Inflammation Score-3.6 centimetersStandard Deviation 2.21
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Inflammation Score-3.6 centimetersStandard Deviation 2.24
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Inflammation Score

The Inflammation score is the mean of the 10-cm visual analog scale scores from the 2 morning stiffness-related BASDAI questions: How would you describe the overall level of morning stiffness you have had from the time you wake up?, with response ranging from none to very severe; and How long does your morning stiffness last from the time you wake up?, with response ranging from 0 hours to 2 or more hours.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Inflammation Score-2.9 centimetersStandard Deviation 2.01
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Inflammation Score-1.5 centimetersStandard Deviation 2.16
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity

Participants assessed their disease activity during the preceding week using a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale, with responses ranging from no activity (0) to severe activity (100).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set, missing data imputed by last observation carried forward (LOCF)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity-37.8 millimetersStandard Deviation 24.47
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity-35.5 millimetersStandard Deviation 25.03
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity

Participants assessed their disease activity during the preceding week using a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale, with responses ranging from no activity (0) to severe activity (100).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set, missing data imputed by last observation carried forward (LOCF)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity-28.8 millimetersStandard Deviation 24.16
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity-11.7 millimetersStandard Deviation 21.77
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain Score

Participants assessed their total back pain within the preceding week using a total back pain 100 mm visual analog scale, with responses ranging from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Total Back Pain Score-42.1 millimetersStandard Deviation 23.29
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Total Back Pain Score-37.8 millimetersStandard Deviation 24.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Back Pain Score

Participants assessed their total back pain within the preceding week using a total back pain 100 mm visual analog scale, with responses ranging from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set, LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Adalimumab/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Total Back Pain Score-32.0 millimetersStandard Deviation 23.55
Placebo/AdalimumabChange From Baseline in Total Back Pain Score-13.7 millimetersStandard Deviation 22.88
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared, Corrected
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting the ASAS20 Response Criteria

ASAS20 responder had improvement of 20% or more and absolute improvement of at least 10 units (on a scale of 0 \[least\] to 100 \[worst\]) from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 4 domains, with absence of deterioration (change for worse of at least 20% and net worsening of at least 10 units) in the potential remaining domain: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI); and Inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set, missing data imputed by NRI

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adalimumab/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the ASAS20 Response Criteria180 participants
Placebo/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the ASAS20 Response Criteria85 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting the ASAS40 Response Criteria

An ASAS40 responder had improvement of 40% or more and absolute improvement of 20 units or more (on a scale of 0 \[least\] to 100 \[worst\]) from Baseline in at least 3 of the 4 domains identified above for the ASAS20. In addition, there must have been an absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain, where deterioration was defined as a net worsening of greater than 0 units (on a scale of 0 to 100).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set, missing data imputed by NRI

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adalimumab/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the ASAS40 Response Criteria134 participants
Placebo/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the ASAS40 Response Criteria63 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting the ASAS40 Response Criteria

An ASAS40 responder had improvement of 40% or more and absolute improvement of 20 units or more (on a scale of 0 \[least\] to 100 \[worst\]) from Baseline in at least 3 of the 4 domains identified above for the ASAS20. In addition, there must have been an absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain, where deterioration was defined as a net worsening of greater than 0 units (on a scale of 0 to 100).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set, missing data imputed by NRI

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adalimumab/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the ASAS40 Response Criteria102 participants
Placebo/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the ASAS40 Response Criteria11 participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting the ASAS5/6 Response Criteria

An ASAS5/6 responder had an improvement from Baseline of 20% or more in 5 of the following 6 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; pain as measured by the Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); function as measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI); inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores); spinal mobility (lateral lumbar flexion from Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index \[BASMI\]); and acute phase reactant (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set, missing data imputed by NRI

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adalimumab/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the ASAS5/6 Response Criteria128 participants
Placebo/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the ASAS5/6 Response Criteria14 participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting the ASAS5/6 Response Criteria

An ASAS5/6 responder had an improvement from Baseline of 20% or more in 5 of the following 6 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; pain as measured by the Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); function as measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI); inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores); spinal mobility (lateral lumbar flexion from Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index \[BASMI\]); and acute phase reactant (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set, missing data imputed by NRI

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adalimumab/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the ASAS5/6 Response Criteria150 participants
Placebo/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the ASAS5/6 Response Criteria69 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting the Bath Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) BASDAI50 Response Criteria

A BASDAI50 responder had at least a 50% improvement from Baseline in BASDAI score. In the BASDAI, participants use a 10-centimeter visual analog scale to answer 6 questions pertaining to symptoms experienced in the preceding week (e.g., How would you describe the overall level of fatigue/tiredness you have experienced? How long does your morning stiffness last from the time you wake up?) Responses range from none to very severe or from 0 hours to 2 or more hours for morning stiffness. The score is calculated as 0.2 (Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4 + Q5/2 + Q6/2).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set, missing data imputed by NRI

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adalimumab/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the Bath Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) BASDAI50 Response Criteria114 participants
Placebo/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the Bath Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) BASDAI50 Response Criteria19 participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting the Bath Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) BASDAI50 Response Criteria

A BASDAI50 responder had at least a 50% improvement from Baseline in BASDAI score. In the BASDAI, participants use a 10-centimeter visual analog scale to answer 6 questions pertaining to symptoms experienced in the preceding week (e.g., How would you describe the overall level of fatigue/tiredness you have experienced? How long does your morning stiffness last from the time you wake up?) Responses range from none to very severe or from 0 hours to 2 or more hours for morning stiffness. The score is calculated as 0.2 (Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4 + Q5/2 + Q6/2).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set, missing data imputed by NRI

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adalimumab/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the Bath Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) BASDAI50 Response Criteria156 participants
Placebo/AdalimumabNumber of Participants Meeting the Bath Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) BASDAI50 Response Criteria71 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission

Participants were classified as having achieved ASAS partial remission if they had a value of less than 20 on a scale from 0 (normal/none) to 100 (most severe) in each of 4 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; pain as measured by the Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); function as measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI); and inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores).

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT analysis set, missing data imputed by NRI

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adalimumab/AdalimumabNumber of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission85 participants
Placebo/AdalimumabNumber of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission33 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission

Participants were classified as having achieved ASAS partial remission if they had a value of less than 20 on a scale from 0 (normal/none) to 100 (most severe) in each of 4 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; pain as measured by the Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); function as measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI); and inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT analysis set, missing data imputed by NRI

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Adalimumab/AdalimumabNumber of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission50 participants
Placebo/AdalimumabNumber of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission4 participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026