Skip to content

Cross Over Convenience And Preference Study Of New Mark VII Compared To Genotropin Pen In Pediatric And Adult Subjects

A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Two Arm Cross Over Study Assessing Dyad (Subject and Caregiver) and Adult Subject Perception of Convenience and Preference of the Newly Developed Genotropin Mark VII Pen.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01112865
Acronym
CHOOSE
Enrollment
120
Registered
2010-04-28
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2012-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Growth Hormone Deficiency

Keywords

Growth Hormone Deficiency, Somatropin, Injection Pen, Medical Device, Cross Over Study, Preference, Convenience, Children, Dyads, Adults

Brief summary

Convenience and preference for the new Mark VII pen compared to the current Genotropin pen will be assessed using a questionaire. it is expected that the new pen will be preferred or at least no different to the current pen.

Interventions

DEVICEGenotropin Pen

Pen provided in 5, 5.3 and 12 mg doses, Dose based on body weight, subcutaneous injection daily for 2 months while in study.

DEVICEMARK VII pen

Pen provided in 5, 5.3 and 12mg doses, dose based on body weight, subcutaneous injection daily for 2 months while in study.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age greater than or equal to 8 years. * Subjects who are starting treatment with growth hormone (Genotropin) for the first time.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with Prader-Willi syndrome or chronic renal insufficiency. * Subjects and caregivers who, in the opinion of the investigator are not able to adequately participate in the study. * Subjects with chronic systemic disorders, such as diabetes and heart disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Dyads (Participant and Caregiver or Parent) and Adult Participants Reporting no Difference or Easier to Use for the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Compared to the Genotropin Pen®Month 4Participants were asked the following question from Section II of the Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) patient-reported outcome (PRO) tool, Thinking about the Genotropin pen and the new injection pen you used over the past few months, please compare both injection pens and choose which one is easier to use overall? Choices included: Genotropin Pen® easier to use, new injection pen easier to use, or no difference.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting no Preference or Preference for the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Compared to the Genotropin Pen®Month 4Participants were asked the following question from Section II of the IPAQ PRO tool, Thinking about both injection pens over the past few months, please choose which injection pen you prefer overall. Choices included: prefer Genotropin Pen®, prefer new injection pen, or no preference.
Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Easier to Use Compared to the Genotropin Pen®Month 4Participants were asked the following question from Section II of the IPAQ PRO tool, Thinking about the Genotropin pen and the new injection pen you used over the past few months, please compare both injection pens and choose which one is easier to use overall? Choices included: Genotropin Pen® easier to use, new injection pen easier to use, or no difference.
Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Preferable Compared to the Genotropin Pen®Month 4Participants were asked the following question from Section II of the IPAQ PRO tool, Thinking about both injection pens over the past few months, please choose which injection pen you prefer overall. Choices included: prefer Genotropin Pen®, prefer new injection pen, or no preference.
Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Who Would Choose the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen in Preference to the Genotropin® PenMonth 4Investigators were asked the following study treatment continuation question, Which device did the participant choose for continued treatment? Choices included the Genotropin® Pen or the new injection pen.
Ease of Use of Each Injection PenMonth 2 and Month 4Participants were asked the following question from Section I of the IPAQ PRO tool, Thinking about the injection pen you have been using for the past few months, how easy or difficult it is for you to use the injection pen overall? Responses were provided using a 5 point scale which ranged from very easy (5), somewhat easy (4), neither easy nor difficult (3), somewhat difficult (2), or very difficult (1).

Countries

Czechia, Germany, Netherlands, Slovakia, Sweden, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Entire Study Population
Includes participants randomized to first use the Mark VII pen (subcutaneous injections daily for 2 months) and participants randomized to first use the current Genotropin® pen (subcutaneous injections daily 2 months). Both pens provided in 5, 5.3, and 12 mg doses of Genotropin (somatropin \[rDNA origin\]); doses received by participants based on body weight.
120
Total120

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEntire Study Population
Age, Customized
≥65 years
2 participants
Age, Customized
≤7 years
28 participants
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 44 years
18 participants
Age, Customized
Between 45 and 64 years
22 participants
Age, Customized
Between 8 and 17 years
50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
69 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
48 / 120
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 120

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Dyads (Participant and Caregiver or Parent) and Adult Participants Reporting no Difference or Easier to Use for the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Compared to the Genotropin Pen®

Participants were asked the following question from Section II of the Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire (IPAQ) patient-reported outcome (PRO) tool, Thinking about the Genotropin pen and the new injection pen you used over the past few months, please compare both injection pens and choose which one is easier to use overall? Choices included: Genotropin Pen® easier to use, new injection pen easier to use, or no difference.

Time frame: Month 4

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): randomized participants who used a study pen at least once to administer somatropin; Number of participants analyzed (N)= participants with evaluable data. Dyad defined as the participant (child being treated) and adult partner (parent or caregiver).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Entire Study PopulationPercentage of Dyads (Participant and Caregiver or Parent) and Adult Participants Reporting no Difference or Easier to Use for the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Compared to the Genotropin Pen®67.23 percentage of dyads, adult participants
Secondary

Ease of Use of Each Injection Pen

Participants were asked the following question from Section I of the IPAQ PRO tool, Thinking about the injection pen you have been using for the past few months, how easy or difficult it is for you to use the injection pen overall? Responses were provided using a 5 point scale which ranged from very easy (5), somewhat easy (4), neither easy nor difficult (3), somewhat difficult (2), or very difficult (1).

Time frame: Month 2 and Month 4

Population: FAS; Number of participants analyzed (N) = participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Entire Study PopulationEase of Use of Each Injection Pen4.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Genotropin® PenEase of Use of Each Injection Pen4.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Secondary

Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting no Preference or Preference for the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Compared to the Genotropin Pen®

Participants were asked the following question from Section II of the IPAQ PRO tool, Thinking about both injection pens over the past few months, please choose which injection pen you prefer overall. Choices included: prefer Genotropin Pen®, prefer new injection pen, or no preference.

Time frame: Month 4

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Entire Study PopulationPercentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting no Preference or Preference for the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Compared to the Genotropin Pen®64.17 percentage of dyads, adult participants
Secondary

Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Easier to Use Compared to the Genotropin Pen®

Participants were asked the following question from Section II of the IPAQ PRO tool, Thinking about the Genotropin pen and the new injection pen you used over the past few months, please compare both injection pens and choose which one is easier to use overall? Choices included: Genotropin Pen® easier to use, new injection pen easier to use, or no difference.

Time frame: Month 4

Population: FAS; Number of participants analyzed (N)= participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Entire Study PopulationPercentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Easier to Use Compared to the Genotropin Pen®51.26 percentage of dyads, adult participants
Secondary

Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Preferable Compared to the Genotropin Pen®

Participants were asked the following question from Section II of the IPAQ PRO tool, Thinking about both injection pens over the past few months, please choose which injection pen you prefer overall. Choices included: prefer Genotropin Pen®, prefer new injection pen, or no preference.

Time frame: Month 4

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Entire Study PopulationPercentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Reporting the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen Preferable Compared to the Genotropin Pen®54.17 percentage of dyads, adult participants
Secondary

Percentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Who Would Choose the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen in Preference to the Genotropin® Pen

Investigators were asked the following study treatment continuation question, Which device did the participant choose for continued treatment? Choices included the Genotropin® Pen or the new injection pen.

Time frame: Month 4

Population: FAS subset of participants located in areas where the new device was available.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Entire Study PopulationPercentage of Dyads and Adult Participants Who Would Choose the New Genotropin Mark VII Injection Pen in Preference to the Genotropin® Pen47.27 percentage of dyads, adult participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis: percentage of participants preferring Genotropin Mark VII injection pen = 50%p-value: 0.6858binomial test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026