Skip to content

A Prospective, Multi-centric Observational Study to Determine the Mono-bifollicular Development in Infertile Women Subjected to Ovulation Induction With Follitropin α

Prospective Multi-centre Observational Study to Determine the Mono-bifollicular Development in Infertile Women Subjected to Ovulation Induction With Follitropin α

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01111084
Acronym
P450
Enrollment
410
Registered
2010-04-27
Start date
2004-03-31
Completion date
2005-06-30
Last updated
2014-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ovulation Induction

Keywords

Ovulation induction, Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, Pregnancy, Fertility

Brief summary

This is a prospective and multicentric observational study to determine the real mono-bifollicular development rate that is obtained under normal care conditions following ovulation induction (OI) treatment with follitropin-alpha filled by mass prescribed in accordance with standard practice.

Detailed description

In women with infertility due to anovulation, the main purpose of ovulation induction (OI) consists in inducing the mono or bifollicular and the subsequent ovulation in order to achieve pregnancy. The availability of recombinant gonadotropins obtained using genetically engineered techniques has meant a decisive and clear pharmacological advancement. Use of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) offers a greater effectiveness (greater number of follicles/ ovocytes and a higher pregnancy rate) and efficiency (fewer number of blisters, fewer stimulation days; fewer number of cancellations and complications) in programmed coitus and artificial insemination like in-vitro fertilisation (IVF)/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) techniques. Further advances in obtaining better products for ovarian stimulation has led to production of a recombinant FSH (follitropin alpha) filled by mass preparation. This hormone becomes the most consistent and precise gonadotropin due to improvements in its quantification process. Today, despite having accurate and modern tools for ovulation induction, in daily practice, doctors continue to fight against two old problems of assisted reproduction: multiple pregnancies and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Application of assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) and the use of medication that induce ovulation, risk producing gestations and multiple births with a higher frequency than those observed in spontaneous gestations. One of the facts that result in the appearance of such problems is the high incidence of polycystic ovarian syndrome among the population of women who are infertile due to anovulation. These subjects are especially sensitive to ovarian stimulation, which leads to multiple follicular development, a higher risk of hyperstimulation and higher rates of multiple pregnancies. Therefore, it seems clear that the search for developing mono or bifollicular cycles is important in ovarian induction cycles, for the purpose of preventing the above mentioned multiple pregnancy problems and the risk of OHSS. The intent of this study was to figure out the real mono-bifollicular development rate that is obtained under normal care conditions following OI treatment with follitropin alpha filled by mass prescribed in accordance with standard practice. Therefore, a measure of the efficiency of the product for achieving the development of one or two follicles. Data was collected from 56 centres of the Autonomous Communities that accepted this observational study, until achieving a total of 410 ovulation induction cycles. OBJECTIVES Primary objective: * To find the real proportion of cycles with mono-bifollicular development during the provision of care involving OI with follitropin alpha filled by mass Secondary objectives: * To evaluate if the use of follitropin alpha filled by mass has other clinical benefits such as a reduction in the number of cancelled cycles, of the dosage and time required and adverse effects

Interventions

DRUGFollitropin alpha (r-FSH)

The dosage and administration of follitropin alpha was according to each centre's protocol and within technical specification recommendations.

Sponsors

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Premenopausal women with infertility caused by anovulation, who wished to conceive and were included in an ovulation induction (OI) treatment protocol for intrauterine insemination or for programmed coitus

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with hypersensitivity to follitropin alpha, to FSH or to any of the excipients * Subjects with hypothalamic or pituitary tumours * Subjects with increase in the size of the ovaries or cysts that were not due to polycystic ovary disease * Subjects with gynaecologic haemorrhages of unknown aetiology * Subjects with ovarian, uterine or mammary carcinoma * Subjects with primary ovarian failure * Subjects with malformations of sex organs that were not compatible with pregnancy * Subjects with uterine fibroid tumours that were not compatible with pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Follicular developmentFirst 10 months from the inclusion of the subjectsNumber and size of follicles as determined through transvaginal ultrasound

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary efficacy assessmentsFrom baseline until the pregnancy or menstruation confirmationDuration of ovulation induction; total accumulated dosage of follitropin alpha; cycles cancelled due to insufficient response or due to risk of ovarian hyperstimulation; proportion of pregnancies
Safety assessmentsFirst 10 months from the inclusion of the subjectsIncidence of adverse occurrences, in particular OHSS; proportion of multiple pregnancies and local reaction at the injection point.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026