Skip to content

Preconditioning for Aneurismal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning to Ameliorate Delayed Ischemic Neurological Deficit After Aneurismal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01110239
Enrollment
34
Registered
2010-04-26
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2010-07-31
Last updated
2017-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Keywords

limb preconditioning, remote preconditioning, ischemic preconditioning

Brief summary

In remote preconditioning, ischemia in one organ protects distant organs from ischemic insults. e.g. brief induced limb ischemia protects the brain from an otherwise more severe stroke. The objective of this study is to determine if remote ischemic preconditioning can be safely and effectively instituted in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, who are at high risk for developing disabling cerebral ischemia. The investigators will also preliminarily assess if there is evidence for neuroprotection. This will be a Phase 1b study. Additional objectives are: 1. to determine if remote ischemic preconditioning can be safely and effectively instituted in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, who are at high risk for developing disabling cerebral ischemia. 2. analogously to a dose-escalation study the investigators propose to study the safety and tolerability of increasing durations of limb ischemia until a target time of 10 minutes of limb ischemia has been reached.

Detailed description

The investigators propose to study patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, who generally have a high risk of ischemic stroke in the 2 weeks following the initial bleed, and patients with clipped or coiled aneurysm. The investigators will apply a blood pressure cuff around leg and use it to interrupt the circulation for 5-10 minutes. The investigators will repeat this for a total of 3 times every 24 to 48 hours up to 14 days. The cuff will be inflated for 5-10 minutes and then deflated for 5 minutes. There will be 3 cycles of this. The cuff will be inflated to 200mmHg. The investigators will first start with 5 minutes of cuff inflation to either the arm or leg. The investigators will determine if this is safe in at least 6 patients. The investigators will then increase the duration of cuff inflation to 7.5 minutes for another 6 patients. If no adverse events are noted the investigators will the proceed to study 10 minutes of inflation in another 6 patients. If no side effects are noted the investigators will then determine that this is well tolerated. The study will be monitored by a Data Safety Monitoring Board who will make decisions about escalating the duration of cuff inflation. If 2 or more patients develop an adverse event that is related to the procedure the investigators will stop and no longer continue at that level of cuff inflation and the previous level of cuff inflation will be determined to be the safe and tolerated level. The investigators will collect safety data on adverse events such as tolerability, local tissue trauma or deep vein thrombosis.

Interventions

PROCEDUREremote limb preconditioning

3 cycles of up to 10 minutes leg ischemia

Sponsors

University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Exclusion criteria

1. Hunt Hess Scale \> 4 2. Inability to undergo limb preconditioning due to local wound or tissue breakdown, history of peripheral extremity vascular disease or patient discomfort. 3. Inability to obtain informed consent from the patient or a health care proxy. 4. Ankle-brachial index \< 0.7 5. Inability to start limb preconditioning within 4 days of bleeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis for Safety Assessment.90 days
Visual Analog Scale Score as a Measure of Tolerability90 daysThe visual analogue scale is a pain scale from 0-10, with 10 being maximum pain and is frequently used in research studies assessing patient discomfort.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects admitted to a large community based teaching hospital were recruited between November 2008 and July 2010.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sham Preconditioning
Subjects with subarachnoid hemorrhage will undergo escalating times of limb ischemia to determine tolerability and safety. The leg will be made transiently ischemic with application of a blood pressure cuff for up to 3 cycles of 10 minutes.
7
5 Min Ischemia14
7.5 Min Ischemia7
10 Min Ischemia6
Total34

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
7.5 Min IschemiaWithdrawal by Subject0010
Sham PreconditioningWithdrawal by Subject0010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham Preconditioning5 Min Ischemia7.5 Min Ischemia10 Min IschemiaTotal
Age, Continuous49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants9 Participants4 Participants3 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants5 Participants3 Participants3 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 78 / 143 / 74 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 79 / 141 / 71 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis for Safety Assessment.

Time frame: 90 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham PreconditioningNumber of Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis for Safety Assessment.0 participants
5 Min IschemiaNumber of Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis for Safety Assessment.3 participants
7.5 Min IschemiaNumber of Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis for Safety Assessment.0 participants
10 Min IschemiaNumber of Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis for Safety Assessment.0 participants
Primary

Visual Analog Scale Score as a Measure of Tolerability

The visual analogue scale is a pain scale from 0-10, with 10 being maximum pain and is frequently used in research studies assessing patient discomfort.

Time frame: 90 days

Population: We escalated the ischemia times in cohorts of 6. Cohorts of 6 were prespecified at the beginning to the study. All analysis was intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham PreconditioningVisual Analog Scale Score as a Measure of Tolerability0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
5 Min IschemiaVisual Analog Scale Score as a Measure of Tolerability3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
7.5 Min IschemiaVisual Analog Scale Score as a Measure of Tolerability1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
10 Min IschemiaVisual Analog Scale Score as a Measure of Tolerability2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026