Skip to content

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty With Large Femoral Heads for the Treatment of Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty With Large Femoral Heads for the Treatment of Displaced Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01109862
Enrollment
80
Registered
2010-04-23
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2011-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral Neck Fractures

Keywords

Femoral neck fractures, Hip fractures, Elderly, Total hip arthroplasty, Bipolar hemiarthroplasty

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare hemiarthroplasty (HAP) with total hip arthroplasty (THA), performed by trained arthroplasty surgeons with the use of large femoral heads for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in mobile independent elderly patients, to determine the impact of these surgical options on the short term functional outcomes and complication rates, namely dislocation and the need for further surgery. This is a single-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial comparing functional outcome and complication rates of 40 patients treated with all cemented THA to a control group of 40 patients treated with cemented bipolar HAP, in a 2 years followup. The primary endpoint is the Oxford hip score (OHS) at last followup as a measure of functional outcome. Secondary endpoints include the SF-36 score, walking distance and rates of postoperative dislocation, component loosening, need for revision and postoperative mortality.

Interventions

PROCEDURETotal hip arthroplasty

All cemented THA

PROCEDUREHemiarthroplasty

Cemented bipolar HAP

Sponsors

Wolfson Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. Acute femoral neck fracture. * 2\. Age between 70 and 90 years old. * 3\. Independent community ambulator (more than 0.5km, without the aid of another person. The use of a cane is permitted) prior to fracture. * 4\. Abbreviated mental test score \> 6 .

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Pathological fracture (excluding osteoporosis). * 2\. Rheumatoid arthritis. * 3\. Symptomatic arthrosis of the involved hip. * 4\. Neurological disorder that may significantly influence walking ability and/or tendency to dislocate. * 5\. Chronic corticosteroid use. * 6\. Concomitant other fracture. * 7\. Very high surgical risk.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oxford hip score (OHS)last followup - 2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
SF-36 score, walking distance2 years followup
dislocation rate, mortality ratewithin follow up - 2 years

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactDror Lakstein, MD
drorale@gmail.com++972-3-5028383

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026