Skip to content

Absorbable Versus Permanent Mesh Fixation Trial in Laparoscopic Midline Ventral Hernia Repair

Absorbable Versus Permanent Mesh Fixation Trial in Laparoscopic Midline Ventral Hernia Repair (SORBET Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01109771
Acronym
SORBET
Enrollment
105
Registered
2010-04-23
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2024-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventral Hernia

Keywords

Ventral hernia

Brief summary

To compare the use of absorbable tackers versus permanent tack fixation using a polyester large pore mesh in laparoscopic midline ventral hernia repair in a multicenter (Belgian) prospective randomized single-blinded trial. All patients referred for elective midline ventral hernia repair should be assessed for eligibility and entered in a study log, detailing all included patients during the study period.

Interventions

DEVICEpermanent mesh fixation

Permanent mesh fixation will be used.

DEVICEabsorbable mesh fixation

Absorbable mesh fixation will be used.

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* written informed consent from the adult patient (18 years and older, no maximum age) * primary, incisional or recurrent midline ventral hernia requiring elective laparoscopic repair

Exclusion criteria

* no written informed consent * hernia defects larger than 10cm diameter in width * 'hostile' abdomen; open abdomen treatment * contraindication to pneumoperitoneum * emergency surgery (incarcerated hernia) * lateral or parastomal hernia sites

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of patients with a VAS scale more than 401 year after surgeryThe Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is commonly used to measure the intensity of pain or other subjective experiences. It is a simple and effective tool. The VAS consists of a straight line, usually 10 cm long, with endpoints defining extreme limits such as 'No pain' and 'Worst imaginable pain'. Respondents mark a point on the line that represents their perception of their current state. Scoring: Scale Title: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Minimum Value: 0 (indicating no pain or the least possible experience of the measured parameter) Maximum Value: 10 (indicating worst imaginable pain or the most extreme experience of the measured parameter) Higher Scores: Indicate a worse outcome (e.g., more intense pain or greater severity of the measured parameter).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of invasive interventions (local infiltrations, reoperations) postoperatively1 year after surgerynumber of invasive interventions (local infiltrations, reoperations) postoperatively, 1 year after surgery
number of patients taking analgetics using MCGill painscore1 year post-surgeryThe McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) measures the quality and intensity of pain through three components: Pain Rating Index (PRI): Derived from 78 pain descriptors in four categories: Sensory (S), Affective (A), Evaluative (E), Miscellaneous (M). Each descriptor has a numerical value. Scale Title: Pain Rating Index (PRI) Range: 0-78 Higher Scores: Indicate greater intensity of pain. Present Pain Intensity (PPI): A single-item scale rating current pain on a 6-point scale. Scale Title: Present Pain Intensity (PPI) Range: 0 (No Pain) to 5 (Excruciating Pain) Higher Scores: Indicate greater intensity of pain. Number of Words Chosen (NWC): Total pain descriptors selected. Scale Title: Number of Words Chosen (NWC) Range: 0-20 Higher Scores: Indicate more complex or severe pain.
perioperative morbidity rate1 year after surgeryperioperative morbidity rate, 1 year after surgery
quality of life by using EQ5D score1 year post-surgeryThe EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status, providing a descriptive profile and a single index value. Descriptive System: Comprises five dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, Anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three severity levels: No problems, Some problems, Extreme problems. Responses form a five-digit number describing the health state (e.g., 11223). EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS): Records self-rated health on a vertical scale from 0 (Worst health) to 100 (Best health), quantifying the patient's overall health perception. EQ-5D Index Value: Derived from the descriptive system. Scale Title: EQ-5D Index Value Range: Typically -0.594 to 1 Higher Scores: Indicate better health outcomes.
recurrence rate1 year post-surgeryrecurrence rate, 1 year post-surgery

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026